Should election deniers be allowed to post on social media?

What’s contradictory about a free media and left leaning?

They are free to lean left if they do choose.
Bias is both intentional and unintentional but both has the same effect.

For example, social media banned stories of the Hunter Biden conspiracy before the election. Afterward, about 20% polled said they would not have voted for Biden had they known.

Meanwhile, every conspiracy theory about Trump is posted 24/7.
 
So lefties agree that Truth Social should be able to censor any left wing ideological posts.

Thats kind of interesting.
 
I wondered what an "election denier" is.
Belief in a massive multi-state voter fraud conspiracy that gave the 2020 election to Joe Biden. The Big Lie pushed by the Neo-GOP leader, Herr Trumpenstein, who was apparently humiliated beyond belief by his defeat.
 
Bias is both intentional and unintentional but both has the same effect.

For example, social media banned stories of the Hunter Biden conspiracy before the election. Afterward, about 20% polled said they would not have voted for Biden had they known.

Meanwhile, every conspiracy theory about Trump is posted 24/7.
The Hunter Biden laptop story came from the highly biased NY Post and was intentionally misleading.

Really you’re complaining that the left wing bias counteracted the right wing bias.
 
The Hunter Biden laptop story came from the highly biased NY Post and was intentionally misleading.

Really you’re complaining that the left wing bias counteracted the right wing bias.

It is Hunter’s laptop. How was the story “intentionally misleading”.

Quote the lies from the article.
 
You mean like the CEO of Meta….a guy named Mark Zuckerberg? You heard of that guy?
So? He did what? Not publish bullshit disinformation at the FBI's request (because their investigation might have still been going on?)

Again, I'm not interested in alt-right media speculation or conspiracy theories.
 
It is Hunter’s laptop. How was the story “intentionally misleading”.

Quote the lies from the article.
It was misleading because it cherry picked some emails to paint as some kind of illegal activity when there was nothing illegal about it.

The NY Post is extremely biased towards Republicans. If the thread is complaining that media bias is bad, then they should also have opposed the bias Hunter Biden story.
 
The Hunter Biden laptop story came from the highly biased NY Post and was intentionally misleading.

Really you’re complaining that the left wing bias counteracted the right wing bias.
Obviously, reading comprehension is not your friend nor is the pursuit of a nonpartisan truth.

Therefore, there is nothing I can do for you.
 
If one can be banned for saying 2020 was rigged, why not also 2016, 2004, 2000….

Why is it only 1 election that people cannot say was rigged?
 
Obviously, reading comprehension is not your friend nor is the pursuit of a nonpartisan truth.

Therefore, there is nothing I can do for you.
Looks like you’re running away because you have nothing.
 
It was misleading because it cherry picked some emails to paint as some kind of illegal activity when there was nothing illegal about it.

The NY Post is extremely biased towards Republicans. If the thread is complaining that media bias is bad, then they should also have opposed the bias Hunter Biden story.

No illegal activity from Hunter Biden is displayed on the laptop?

What about business dealings?
 

Forum List

Back
Top