Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

[OohPooPahDoo]

Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Any business secular or religious is subject to the law.

The law is not going to allow the Church of GISMYS sacrifice virginal Vigilantes to whatever God the church believes in.

 

[Peach]

Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

Yes, of course, if public, all Federal, State, and local laws. A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

 

[Kosh]

Any business secular or religious is subject to the law.

The law is not going to allow the Church of GISMYS sacrifice virginal Vigilantes to whatever God the church believes in.

More proof that the far left is more dangerous than any terrorist organization out there.

 

[Kosh]

Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

Yes, of course, if public, all Federal, State, and local laws. A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

More proof of the far left that lives with in...

Your own far left ACLU disagrees with you!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Why wouldn't they have to abide by the law?

 

[Mac1958]

.

Businesses, churches, people who cross our borders illegally, people who provide sanctuary for those who cross our borders illegally.

Yep.

Check.

.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Since all business no matter who owns it are subject to the law of the land this is a stupid poll. Private organizations are exempt due to religious convictions as dictated by the 1st Amendment. But only to very narrow specific things.

The 1st amendment does not allow a religion to break criminal law.

 

[eagle1462010]

Stupid poll. All people are subject to the law..........Unless they work for the Gov't, in which case they get to choose which laws to obey and which ones not to.

Kinda like our current administration.

 

[Peach]

Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

Yes, of course, if public, all Federal, State, and local laws. A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

More proof of the far left that lives with in...

Your own far left ACLU disagrees with you!

Put the liquor away, you are not comprehending what is written.

 

[Peach]

Since all business no matter who owns it are subject to the law of the land this is a stupid poll. Private organizations are exempt due to religious convictions as dictated by the 1st Amendment. But only to very narrow specific things.

The 1st amendment does not allow a religion to break criminal law.

That sums it up well.

 

[Kosh]

Yes, of course, if public, all Federal, State, and local laws. A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

More proof of the far left that lives with in...

Your own far left ACLU disagrees with you!

Put the liquor away, you are not comprehending what is written.

Yep the far left can not handle when their comments are trumped by the far left ACLU.

Amazing how that works!

 

[Peach]

Again, for the slow readers:

A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

 

[Kosh]

Since all business no matter who owns it are subject to the law of the land this is a stupid poll. Private organizations are exempt due to religious convictions as dictated by the 1st Amendment. But only to very narrow specific things.

The 1st amendment does not allow a religion to break criminal law.

So why does the ACLU use a lot of civil laws against these private organizations?

And we see the far left throw around the word "rights" when they do not understand what it means?

So is discrimination "criminal" law?

 

[The Rabbi]

Again, for the slow readers:

A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

Churches are businesses.

There is no reasonable distinction between a profit and a non profit corporation in the law regarding exemptions for religious liberty. Why should The Little Sisters have an exemption to Obmaacare on religious grounds but not Hobby Lobby? There is no reason. Both of them are entitled to the same exemption.

 

[Peach]

Again, for the slow readers:

A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

Churches are businesses.

There is no reasonable distinction between a profit and a non profit corporation in the law regarding exemptions for religious liberty. Why should The Little Sisters have an exemption to Obmaacare on religious grounds but not Hobby Lobby? There is no reason. Both of them are entitled to the same exemption.

"Sue & See". Ok, seriously, there are litmus tests for religious organizations, elements must exist to be granted the exemptions. The Free Exercise Clause is the subject to litigation frequently.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Any business secular or religious is subject to the law.

The law is not going to allow the Church of GISMYS sacrifice virginal Vigilantes to whatever God the church believes in.

More proof that the far left is more dangerous than any terrorist organization out there.

So you programmed far right drones do not want the government to prohibit your human sacrifices?

You moron.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Again, for the slow readers:

A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

Churches are businesses.

There is no reasonable distinction between a profit and a non profit corporation in the law regarding exemptions for religious liberty. Why should The Little Sisters have an exemption to Obmaacare on religious grounds but not Hobby Lobby? There is no reason. Both of them are entitled to the same exemption.

Because the sisters are about religion, Hobby Lobby is about business.

Businesses have no religious liberty.

 

[The Rabbi]

Again, for the slow readers:

A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

Churches are businesses.

There is no reasonable distinction between a profit and a non profit corporation in the law regarding exemptions for religious liberty. Why should The Little Sisters have an exemption to Obmaacare on religious grounds but not Hobby Lobby? There is no reason. Both of them are entitled to the same exemption.

"Sue & See". Ok, seriously, there are litmus tests for religious organizations, elements must exist to be granted the exemptions. The Free Exercise Clause is the subject to litigation frequently.

There is no legitimate distinction between profit and non profit corporations.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Should businesses owned by members of a religion be accountable to the law?

Yes, of course, if public, all Federal, State, and local laws. A private organization isn't defined as a business though.

"Private organizations" don't engage in business?

That's news to me.