...meanwhile, even in the Black Lives Matter shooting in Dallas, Texas....where 6 police officers were murdered by a supporter of black lives matter, there were armed citizens marching, many with rifles on slings. When the attack happened, they simply found cover and let the police handle the attack...
Well that directly contradicts your assertions about armed citizens being instrumental in stopping active shooter incidents. It also proves my point that you don't need guns to defend yourself, let the police handle it
In the Texas church shooting,
Which one? There have been so many, and in just about every case the gunmen were law abiding citizens armed with legal firearms. The fact that churches in America NEED armed security speaks volumes in favour of gun control.
You make up crap all the time with no knowledge of truth, facts or reality...
Projecting again, I see.
And as to etching bullet casings...
It may not work now, but who knows, as technology gets better, we may have a viable ammunition control system. The Swiss already have rudementary ammunition control, why not America. Solves your 2nd ammendment issues.
Mother Jones is an anti-gun magazine...run by rabidly anti-gun extremists...
...and concealed carry.com is a pro-gun website...run by rabidly pro-gun extremists...
were 33 at which an armed citizen was present. Of those, Armed Citizens were successful at stopping the Active shooter 75.8% of the time (25 incidents) and were successful in reducing the loss of life in an additional 18.2% (6) of incidents. In only 2 of the 33 incidents (6.1%) was the Armed Citizen(s) not helpful in any way in stopping the active shooter or reducing the loss of life.
How many of these "successful" armed citizens were off duty or retired military, security, or law enforcement, who had training in dealing with this type of situations?
Here is what the majority of police chiefs say about armed Americans.....
http://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/NACOP-surveyresults-2016.pdf
And here is a look at the survey....
This made me howl with laughter, 729 Police Chiefs were in the sample, your 94% headline means 692 were in favour...out of over 18,000 Police forces in the USA. 94%
Again...you know nothing..
No......since you are an idiot, you would post something like that.