- Thread starter
- #21
The Zombies seem to have the same thought pattern everywhere I go. Never seen such Jim Jones type behavior in American politics like this!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Shock Me! Give Me ONE Liberal Who Will Be Honest!
- Thread starter craner
- Start date
The Zombies seem to have the same thought pattern everywhere I go. Never seen such Jim Jones type behavior in American politics like this!
- Thread starter
- #22
Facts? Not from Goodwin or New York Post...
Stop watching MSNBC all the time and you might learn something
- Thread starter
- #24
Facts? Not from Goodwin or New York Post...
Well heres one of your own libbys....Maureen Dowd NY Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/opinion/sunday/dowd-is-rice-cooked.html?ref=opinion&_r=1&
theunbubba
Member
- Feb 28, 2009
- 560
- 55
- 16
Honest? You stupid fucking NaziCons don't know the meaning of the word.
Says the troll from Obama's asshole.
Facts? Not from Goodwin or New York Post...
Well heres one of your own libbys....Maureen Dowd NY Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/opinion/sunday/dowd-is-rice-cooked.html?ref=opinion&_r=1&
Maureen Dowd is known to be somewhat racist in her writings.
- Thread starter
- #27
Obama apologists have so eloquently explained good reasons for dropping the whole thing:
Only wacko right-wingers want an investigation. Well, there you go; if those loony Republicans and their ilk like loudmouthed Rush Limbaugh want something, we must automatically oppose it. You don't even have to know why they want an investigation. Just the fact that they want it is reason enough to oppose it.
It's offensive. President Barack Obama said he "took offense" to suggestions that he or his administration tried to hide the truth about the raid. "Offending," as the high priests of correctness have informed us, is the gravest and darkest of all sins.
Thou shalt not "go after" U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice for maintaining the fiction that the raid was prompted by an insulting YouTube video and not a planned terrorist attack. Sayeth the president: " for them to go after the U.N. ambassador, who had nothing to do with Benghazi and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous." He added: "But when they go after the U.N. ambassador, apparently because they think she's an easy target, then they've got a problem with me." How gallant of the president to defend Rice.
The election is over; we need to move on. Why waste our time fixing responsibility for the deaths of four Americans, the wounding of three others and the violation of the sovereign grounds of an American consulate? They're all fungible.
The attacks on Rice are racist and sexist. So says a group of House women, The Associated Press reported. Pressing for how much Rice knew and when she knew it is thin camouflage of racism and sexism by old white men.
No one in the military could have done anything to stop it. It's more evidence that we should mind our own business, stay out of foreign entanglements and slash military spending.
It's not Watergate. It's a political witch hunt, designed to embarrass and discredit the newly re-elected Obama. It's a lot of Republican claptrap, another one of those conspiracy theories created out of thin air.
Whoops. That's exactly what Republicans were saying when the FBI and newspaper investigators were closing in on President Richard "I am not a crook" Nixon for covering up the Watergate break-in by his operatives. Republican defenders of Nixon described it as merely a third-rate burglary and said investigating it would be a waste of time because nothing illegal or untoward happened. When Democrats begin sounding like Republicans, we know that the Earth's magnetic poles have shifted.
But I digress. Any one of these points is reason enough to shut down any investigation of why the consulate was poorly defended, why Stevens' pleas for a stronger defense were ignored, whether someone issued orders for the quick-response military unit to stand down, whether the command and control structure so essential to national security broke down, if terrorists were prisoners being held in the CIA annex and what was the CIA's role there, and whether the Obama administration was trying to avoid responsibility.
And how about the assertion that the CIA knew from the start that Benghazi was a terrorist attack but that references to al-Qaida involvement were removed from the agency's memo to the administration. No answer needed there, either.
As Obamaphiles remind us, none of these questions are more important than avoiding hurt feelings.
Only wacko right-wingers want an investigation. Well, there you go; if those loony Republicans and their ilk like loudmouthed Rush Limbaugh want something, we must automatically oppose it. You don't even have to know why they want an investigation. Just the fact that they want it is reason enough to oppose it.
It's offensive. President Barack Obama said he "took offense" to suggestions that he or his administration tried to hide the truth about the raid. "Offending," as the high priests of correctness have informed us, is the gravest and darkest of all sins.
Thou shalt not "go after" U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice for maintaining the fiction that the raid was prompted by an insulting YouTube video and not a planned terrorist attack. Sayeth the president: " for them to go after the U.N. ambassador, who had nothing to do with Benghazi and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous." He added: "But when they go after the U.N. ambassador, apparently because they think she's an easy target, then they've got a problem with me." How gallant of the president to defend Rice.
The election is over; we need to move on. Why waste our time fixing responsibility for the deaths of four Americans, the wounding of three others and the violation of the sovereign grounds of an American consulate? They're all fungible.
The attacks on Rice are racist and sexist. So says a group of House women, The Associated Press reported. Pressing for how much Rice knew and when she knew it is thin camouflage of racism and sexism by old white men.
No one in the military could have done anything to stop it. It's more evidence that we should mind our own business, stay out of foreign entanglements and slash military spending.
It's not Watergate. It's a political witch hunt, designed to embarrass and discredit the newly re-elected Obama. It's a lot of Republican claptrap, another one of those conspiracy theories created out of thin air.
Whoops. That's exactly what Republicans were saying when the FBI and newspaper investigators were closing in on President Richard "I am not a crook" Nixon for covering up the Watergate break-in by his operatives. Republican defenders of Nixon described it as merely a third-rate burglary and said investigating it would be a waste of time because nothing illegal or untoward happened. When Democrats begin sounding like Republicans, we know that the Earth's magnetic poles have shifted.
But I digress. Any one of these points is reason enough to shut down any investigation of why the consulate was poorly defended, why Stevens' pleas for a stronger defense were ignored, whether someone issued orders for the quick-response military unit to stand down, whether the command and control structure so essential to national security broke down, if terrorists were prisoners being held in the CIA annex and what was the CIA's role there, and whether the Obama administration was trying to avoid responsibility.
And how about the assertion that the CIA knew from the start that Benghazi was a terrorist attack but that references to al-Qaida involvement were removed from the agency's memo to the administration. No answer needed there, either.
As Obamaphiles remind us, none of these questions are more important than avoiding hurt feelings.
Why are you plagiarizing the Chicago Tribune without giving credit or link?
theunbubba
Member
- Feb 28, 2009
- 560
- 55
- 16
Da zombies are in fine form tonight.
The Zombies seem to have the same thought pattern everywhere I go. Never seen such Jim Jones type behavior in American politics like this!
Come on man, they've been this way since the 1913 era.
I personally had to battle it in high school the 60's and 70's .
- Thread starter
- #31
Why are you plagiarizing the Chicago Tribune without giving credit or link?
So sorry libtard....it wasnt on purpose.
What happened in Benghazi? - chicagotribune.com
Yeah, right...
The final investigative reports will tell us the facts.
jimmyDilorenzo
Member
When someone can't reply with a rational reponse, and espeially when they go in to attack mode, its already game over pal ..they conceded , and they have no other response to offer to defend the pos !!!Figures. No one yet. Typical pathetic answers from the Obamabots. Arent you ashamed to be so f'ing blind to truth because of your allegiance to the POS? How about putting America first idiots?
jimmyDilorenzo
Member
yes, that michael goodwin, who voted for obama 4 years ago ..but had the balls to admit his mistake !!!Michael Goodwin? New York Post? Funny...
So if the " final " report says they failed to give adequate security will you condemn Obama and his POS admin? Or find excuses for it? Will you demand impeachment or heads to roll ?
When you NaziCon retards seriously consider having Bush extradited to The Hague to stand trial for war crimes - then I might consider Benghazi if Obama ignored warnings similar to Bush ignoring pre-9/11 warnings and then falsifying evidence to blame it on Saddam and then starting a 2nd unjustified Bush Iraq war. Actually, I'd like to see both Bush presidents sent to The Hague to stand trial for war crimes.
Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?
yes, that michael goodwin, who voted for obama 4 years ago ..but had the balls to admit his mistake !!!Michael Goodwin? New York Post? Funny...
Do you have proof he voted for Obama in 2008?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 77
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 34
- Views
- 769
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 598
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8158
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-