"shall not be infringed"

[Billo_Really]

So? M-1 Garands, M-1 Carbines, M-1As, M1903 Springfields, Small Magazine Lee-Enfields, Mauser 98Ks, Moisan Nagants, Lugers, P-38s, Browning HiPowers, Winchester 1897 shotguns, Mossberg shotguns, M-1911A1 pistols, Mauser PPKs and SKS carbines are all actual weapons of war. Do you want them banned as well?

I'm sorry, I'm not a gun guy. No automatic weapons for civilians. Period!

 

[2aguy]

I'm sorry, I'm not a gun guy. No automatic weapons for civilians. Period!

But you are fine with AR-15s....right?

 

[Billo_Really]

But you are fine with AR-15s....right?

Is it an automatic weapon?

 

[Auld Phart]

Is it an automatic weapon?

no

semi auto

 

[AZrailwhale]

I'm sorry, I'm not a gun guy. No automatic weapons for civilians. Period!

Every weapon I listed either were or are in use by militaries. They are REAL WEAPONS OF WAR.

 

[progressive hunter]

Every weapon I listed either were or are in use by militaries. They are REAL WEAPONS OF WAR.

a baseball bat is a weapon of war if thats all you have,,

 

[Flash]

Can any person keep and bear Arms?

Arms are used in War, are they all infringed?

No, not at all!

Thus, either the NRA goes to bat to Congress and have the President sign a bill that the 2nd Amendment takes out "Arms" and adds all weapons that are fringed and infringed.

Of course, the number and development of new weapons have changes, maybe then the Supreme Court can get to work and not have some billionaires pay for their vacations and expensive toys.

And, the 50 states legislatures can use their votes to pass gun controls, and the good people living in the District have the power of the same 50.

You stupid uneducated Moon Bats don't know any more about the Constitution than you know about Economics, Biology, History, Climate Science or Ethics.

 

[Flash]

If somebody is so damn stupid as to not understand what the term "shall not be infringed" means then they are pretty damn stupid.

However, it is not about the Libturds not understanding what it means. It is about them not wanting to understand what it means.

 

[Failzero]

Since the US gov has not been attacked since 1812, then the government needs SAMs even less than we do.

Japs attacked the West Coast & Alaska and Pancho Villa attacked the Southwest ...

 

[2aguy]

Is it an automatic weapon?

No.

 

[Rye Catcher]

You stupid uneducated Moon Bats don't know any more about the Constitution than you know about Economics, Biology, History, Climate Science or Ethics.

The fact that you can't write an expository essay and instead post an absurd comment above; it's tantamount to an Idiot-Gram.

 

[2aguy]

The fact that you can't write an expository essay and instead post an absurd comment above; it's tantamount to an Idiot-Gram.

I have read your posts......you should not be throwing stones........

 

[Captain Caveman]

Never going to happen, most can and do own "arms", that just isn't going to change, with or without "war".

32% is not most -

What Percentage of Americans Own Guns?

Read Gallup's short answer to this common question about gun ownership, including what percentages of major demographic subgroups own guns.

news.gallup.com

 

[2aguy]

32% is not most -

What Percentage of Americans Own Guns?

Read Gallup's short answer to this common question about gun ownership, including what percentages of major demographic subgroups own guns.

news.gallup.com

Yeah....you dont have the latest data...the number could be as high as 60%

 

[Billo_Really]

no

semi auto

No semi's, either.

 

[Billo_Really]

Every weapon I listed either were or are in use by militaries. They are REAL WEAPONS OF WAR.

Okay fine. Civilians shouldn't own them.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Can any person keep and bear Arms?

Arms are used in War, are they all infringed?

No, not at all!

Thus, either the NRA goes to bat to Congress and have the President sign a bill that the 2nd Amendment takes out "Arms" and adds all weapons that are fringed and infringed.

Of course, the number and development of new weapons have changes, maybe then the Supreme Court can get to work and not have some billionaires pay for their vacations and expensive toys.

And, the 50 states legislatures can use their votes to pass gun controls, and the good people living in the District have the power of the same 50.

Just come right out and say what you mean to say instead of speaking in code.

A man has the right to protect himself. He has the right to carry self-protection sufficient to fend off others with equal or more powerful weaponry. YOU don't get to decide what I can use as a tool for self-defense. Period.

 

[Billo_Really]

No.

Then you may keep your weapon.

 

[SaxonJackson]

No semi's, either.

I love all of my Semi-Autos. They're perfectly fine. None of them has ever walked out the door and hurt anyone. But if the gangs in the next town over have them, then I want them as well. If a tyrannical government has them, then I want them as well. But I don't need some empty suit in D.C. or some empty-headed LibTard dictating what I "should" or "should not" have. It's none of their idiotic business.

 

[miketx]

"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution"

Get a copy of the Constitution and learn a little.

Consider too: Article 1, sec. 8, clauses 14, 15 & 16.

Come get my guns commie.