I gave you an excellent example but look at the diversity of early Christianity. It would take a full page just to list the various churches we now consider heretical. Would one man give rise to so many different theologies?
Zone1 Separation of Church and State?
- Thread starter Meriweather
- Start date
Whether you or anyone else realizes it, he's been doing the exact same thing in your lives. You just don't notice it. But you and everyone else are being pruned.
Just give me one example for starters. Because I think that's probably even a dumber argument than massive conspiracy.
I appreciate your concern but it is my reason you'll have to change, my heart is fine and, if there is a God, I'm not afraid of his judgement. I follow most of the commandments and, if he wants me to believe in him or worship him, he'll have to tell me that himself.
It's not his judgment you have to be afraid of, it's yours.
And you haven't a clue what worship is in actuality.
He has a very wicked sense of humor, I guess the jokes on me then.
It is. Once you realize what you could have been. Bottom line, you are without excuse.
HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 11,539
- 8,807
- 2,138
In fact, many states had state sponsored religions that recieved money from the states after the Constitution was ratified.
NOBODY ever challenged any of them.
The people of the states wisely wrote them out of their constitutions but the last one didn't stop until the mid 1830's.
This supports the point you are making.
Not exactly. The first part is correct but SCOTUS has misapplied the 14th amendment to the bill of rights and now binds the states to the restrictions that were originally applied only to the federal government.
The 14th Amendment's due process clause, which states that no state can deprive a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the liberties guaranteed by the First Amendment. This doctrine, called incorporation, makes states subject to the First Amendment, including its Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing or sponsoring religion. The Supreme Court explicitly applied the Establishment Clause to the states in the 1947 case Everson v. Board of Education.
The 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights | Tenth Amendment Center
Did Congress or the ratifying States intend to incorporate, in whole or in part, the Bill of Rights
tenthamendmentcenter.com
Like I said, I'm not afraid of being judged.
That I believe but I'm not convinced you do either.
My worship is subliminal. You'd never be able to tell I was doing it. It's how to exist perfectly.
As for your judgement, you will be stripped of your pride and you will judge yourself. You may believe it will be easy but it's not.
HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 11,539
- 8,807
- 2,138
Not exactly. The first part is correct but SCOTUS has misapplied the 14th amendment to the bill of rights and now binds the states to the restrictions that were originally applied only to the federal government.
The 14th Amendment's due process clause, which states that no state can deprive a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the liberties guaranteed by the First Amendment. This doctrine, called incorporation, makes states subject to the First Amendment, including its Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing or sponsoring religion. The Supreme Court explicitly applied the Establishment Clause to the states in the 1947 case Everson v. Board of Education.
The 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights | Tenth Amendment Center
Did Congress or the ratifying States intend to incorporate, in whole or in part, the Bill of Rights
Totally agreed.
The process/doctrine is call "Selective Incorporation".
It fell out of the communists blacks robes from the FDR court.
We need to challenge that with THIS court and see if we can't get away from freedom of religion = freedom from religion.
That is not what that means.
HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 11,539
- 8,807
- 2,138
Not sure what this supposed to prove.
The problem with that is that it would also apply to the 2nd Amendment as well. In other words, the 2nd Amendment was originally written to prevent the federal government from infringing on the right to bear arms. Incorporation restricts the states from doing so. So double edged sword so to speak.
BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 19,199
- 1,575
- 85
no original of the claimed manuscripts exist ... nor any documents used to write the 4th century christian bible as there was not an archive preserved to verify the source for anything included to write their bible.
written in the 4th century during a 100 year time frame is the conspiracy in of itself for any authenticity reflecting the true 1st century events, the refutation of judaism those in the 1st century gave their lives for that is sorely misrepresented in their final version.
Says who? Your satanic cult?
Only that, though I'm far from perfect, my conscience is clear. If I was to meet God, I don't fear His judgement.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
Mexico’s President Says She Denied Trump Offer To Target Cartels With US Troops
- Started by 0311
- Replies: 3
-
Zone1 Everybody Worships....The Choice is....
- Started by PoliticalChic
- Replies: 4
