Second year above 1.5c is looking possible



We're fucked if we don't get away from fossil fuels. Trump if he can't do solar and wind should probably make fusion a reality and fast!!! It may well save our ass and would probably be enough to power carbon removal better then solar or wind...Be it pumping it into the ground or converting it from co2 to c and o2. Takes alot of energy.

Everything is fine. Relax.
 
The great warming after the ice age directly benefited humans making us an agricultural species instead of a hunter gather species. Basically carved the entire landscape we take for granted today.
If it wasn't for that global warming, my house would be buried under a mile of ice.
Liberals seem to think we can lock the climate into some static state benefiting humans who stupidly built mega cities in flood zones.

Leftists are the original single stage thinkers.
 


We're fucked if we don't get away from fossil fuels. Trump if he can't do solar and wind should probably make fusion a reality and fast!!! It may well save our ass and would probably be enough to power carbon removal better then solar or wind...Be it pumping it into the ground or converting it from co2 to c and o2. Takes alot of energy.


Yawnnn..... Zzzz....

Don't you ever realize you are being misled with misleading climate cult crap?

If the UHI was fully realized in the temperature data the warming rate would be at least 50 to 75% LOWER, that is due to badly sited temperature stations collecting in anomalous areas such is big cities, here is a video presentation that explains it well.

The Graph that lied

 
The Graph that lied



Is the Ocean getting more "urbanized" too?

1747365489043.webp



`
 
Is the Ocean getting more "urbanized" too?

View attachment 1111838


`

LOL your chart is garbage since there are no reliable ocean temperature data before 1985, you didn't bother watching the video that covers it and it listed as Anomalies and confidence levels are pure lies that science illiterates like YOU would never understand how you are being so easily snookered as this is FRAUD!

The UK Hadley group have a serious problem explaining why they get daily temperature data from 103 non existent temperature recording stations.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha......
 
LOL your chart is garbage since there are no reliable ocean temperature data before 1985, you didn't bother watching the video that covers it and it listed as Anomalies and confidence levels are pure lies that science illiterates like YOU would never understand how you are being so easily snookered as this is FRAUD!

The UK Hadley group have a serious problem explaining why they get daily temperature data from 103 non existent temperature recording stations.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha......
Nothing is "Reliable" to a Mel Gibson Style ConspiracYst.
Go to bed you FREAK!

It's remarkably similar to air Temp, which of course figures whether you are logical or a Sick Freak like you. Of course, if they were divergent that would help you, but they aren't.

YOU LOSE until you can produce Data other than from the usual reliable sources even before the "Libs" started the '20,000 scientst Conspiracy.'

Get the F*** outa here FREAK!

`
 
Last edited:
there are no reliable ocean temperature data before 1985
<ahem>


ocean temperature.webp
 
Who here believes climate scientists were expecting cooler temperature in 2025? ... folks at New Scientist are lying to you ... we're still producing carbon dioxide, so temperatures are going to continue to rise ... what kind of stupid moron would say anything else ...

Currently we're 1ºC over the 20th Century average ... where as climate changed? ... no answer means climate isn't changing ...

Everything is fine. Relax.
 
<ahem>


View attachment 1111887

I should have specified non proxy data.
 
Nothing is "Reliable" to a Mel Gibson Style ConspiracYst.
Go to bed you FREAK!

It's remarkably similar to air Temp, which of course figures whether you are logical or a Sick Freak like you. Of course, if they were divergent that would help you, but they aren't.

YOU LOSE until you can produce Data other than from the usual reliable sources even before the "Libs" started the '20,000 scientst Conspiracy.'

Get the F*** outa here FREAK!

`
So you have no rebuttal, thank you for clearing that up.
 
15th post
I should have specified non proxy data.
I wasn't nitpicking you. I believe it's important that people understand that even when both hemispheres were cooling, which was driven by the northern hemisphere, the sun was shining just the same as when the oceans were warming after the glacial period ended.
 
So you have no rebuttal, thank you for clearing that up.

No, No.
YOU Had No rebuttal to My Mainstream Data, so YOU called it untrustworthy.
A necessary cop out for Cognitive Dissonance ConspiracYsts.
.
 
Last edited:
No, No.
YOU Had No rebuttal to My Mainstream Data, so YOU called it untrustworthy.
A necessary cop out for Cognitive Dissonance ConspiracYsts.
.
You mean the mainstream data that proves the planet warms during interglacial periods?
 
Back
Top Bottom