Second year above 1.5c is looking possible

[ReinyDays]

View attachment 1117015

"Climate related deaths" ...

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

 

[Old Rocks]

No, these are not non sequiturs. The last interglacial period was 2C warmer than toiday with 26 ft higher seas than today with 120 ppm less CO2 than today. And the last time the planet had 400 ppm of CO2, THE PLANET COOLED. These facts scare you.

Bullshit. Here are the facts;

"The last time global carbon dioxide levels were consistently at or above 400 parts per million (ppm) was around four million years ago during the Pliocene Era. During this period, the world was about 3°C warmer than it is today, with sea levels higher than today as well. The Pliocene climate was characterized by significant changes in the distribution of land and sea ice, leading to warmer temperatures and higher sea levels."

What Earth's Climate Was Like Last Time CO2 Was Over 400ppm (Like Now)

“What was the climate and sea level like at times in Earth’s history when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was at 400ppm?” The last time global carbon dioxide levels were consistently at or above 400 parts per million (ppm) was around four million years ago during a geological period known as...

nationalinterest.org

 

[Old Rocks]

All this has been refuted ... or is just complete bullshit ... coral reef bleaching is a "climate tipping point"? ... do you know how silly that sounds? ... harsher on the coral reef ecosystem is sun screen ... reefs without a tourist load are doing fine ...

Do you have any evidence of these mythological "tipping points"? ... normally we model these thermodynamic systems as "equilibrium" ... except that's not scary sounding ... "tipping points" is just more New Speak ...

More dumb fuckery from a willfully ignorant source. The Milankovitch Cycles contain good examples of tipping points. When you look at the graph of the Cycles, you see gradual descent into ice ages, and very rapid melting going into the interglacieal.

3.3: Milankovitch Cycles and the Climate of the Quaternary

The most recent period of Earth's geologic history—spanning the last 2.6 million years—is known as the Quaternary period. This is an important period for us because it encompasses the …

eng.libretexts.org

 

[ding]

Bullshit. Here are the facts;

"The last time global carbon dioxide levels were consistently at or above 400 parts per million (ppm) was around four million years ago during the Pliocene Era. During this period, the world was about 3°C warmer than it is today, with sea levels higher than today as well. The Pliocene climate was characterized by significant changes in the distribution of land and sea ice, leading to warmer temperatures and higher sea levels."

What Earth's Climate Was Like Last Time CO2 Was Over 400ppm (Like Now)

“What was the climate and sea level like at times in Earth’s history when carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was at 400ppm?” The last time global carbon dioxide levels were consistently at or above 400 parts per million (ppm) was around four million years ago during a geological period known as...

nationalinterest.org

And then it cooled with over 400 ppm. Just like it cooled with over 600 ppm. Just like it cooled with over 1000 ppm. The planet has been cooling for 50 million years. All with higher concentrations of CO2 than today. Where was the climate sensitivity back then?

 

[ding]

More dumb fuckery from a willfully ignorant source. The Milankovitch Cycles contain good examples of tipping points. When you look at the graph of the Cycles, you see gradual descent into ice ages, and very rapid melting going into the interglacieal.

View attachment 1117078

3.3: Milankovitch Cycles and the Climate of the Quaternary

The most recent period of Earth's geologic history—spanning the last 2.6 million years—is known as the Quaternary period. This is an important period for us because it encompasses the …

eng.libretexts.org

Can you show me where orbital forcing is captured in the IPCC's energy budget?

 

[ding]

Huh... I guess he can't.

 

[Old Rocks]

Can you show me where orbital forcing is captured in the IPCC's energy budget?

View attachment 1117256

Damn but you are an expert in dumbfuckery. Orbitual forcing is not in that graph because it is a graph of GHG forcing. And orbitual forcing occurs on a much longer time scale. However, it is orbitual forcing that creates the variations in the GHG levels when we are talking about natural forcing. What is happening now is not natural forcing but extremely rapid forcing due to our putting huge amounts of GHG's into the atmosphere. Even in the very rapid switch from glacial to interglacial, it took about 14,000 years to go from 180 ppm of CO2 to 280 ppm of CO2. In less than 200 years we have gone from 280 ppm of CO2 to about 420 ppm of CO2. And from about 600 or 700 ppb of CH4 to over 1900 ppb of CH4. And then there are the industrial GHG's, many hundreds or even thousands of times as effect of GHG's as CO2. But keep your head up your ass, I am sure that makes you more comfortable.

 

[Old Rocks]

And then it cooled with over 400 ppm. Just like it cooled with over 600 ppm. Just like it cooled with over 1000 ppm. The planet has been cooling for 50 million years. All with higher concentrations of CO2 than today. Where was the climate sensitivity back then?

View attachment 1117089

Talk about getting everything totally backward. Yes, it has been cooling since the CO2 level was at 400 ppm. And the level of CO2 has also been dropping. In fact, dropping to about 180 ppm in mid glacial, and only rising to about 300 ppm in warmer interglacials. And in those warmer interglacials, the sea level was much higher than it is today, 20 feet or more higher. That is exactly why we are seeing a rapid increase in sea level now.

 

[ding]

Damn but you are an expert in dumbfuckery. Orbitual forcing is not in that graph because it is a graph of GHG forcing. And orbitual forcing occurs on a much longer time scale. However, it is orbitual forcing that creates the variations in the GHG levels when we are talking about natural forcing. What is happening now is not natural forcing but extremely rapid forcing due to our putting huge amounts of GHG's into the atmosphere. Even in the very rapid switch from glacial to interglacial, it took about 14,000 years to go from 180 ppm of CO2 to 280 ppm of CO2. In less than 200 years we have gone from 280 ppm of CO2 to about 420 ppm of CO2. And from about 600 or 700 ppb of CH4 to over 1900 ppb of CH4. And then there are the industrial GHG's, many hundreds or even thousands of times as effect of GHG's as CO2. But keep your head up your ass, I am sure that makes you more comfortable.

Neither is the sun and it's on there, dumb ass. Busted!!!

 

[ding]

Talk about getting everything totally backward. Yes, it has been cooling since the CO2 level was at 400 ppm. And the level of CO2 has also been dropping. In fact, dropping to about 180 ppm in mid glacial, and only rising to about 300 ppm in warmer interglacials. And in those warmer interglacials, the sea level was much higher than it is today, 20 feet or more higher. That is exactly why we are seeing a rapid increase in sea level now.

It's been cooling since CO2 was over 1000 ppm, dummy.
'

 

[abu afak]

It's been cooling since CO2 was over 1000 ppm, dummy.
'
View attachment 1117730

This daily repeatedly/Cross-Posted graph, like all of yours, sheds no light on whether the last 150 years of warming was caused by GHGs.

The absurd scale and reasons are completely different.

Thx your your stupid reply/bump opportunity.
`

 

[ding]

This daily repeatedly/Cross-Posted graph, like all of yours, sheds no light on whether the last 150 years of warming was caused by GHGs.

The absurd scale and reasons are completely different.

Thx your your stupid reply/bump opportunity.
`

You mean the empirical climate evidence from the geologic record which shows the planet cooled for millions of years with significantly more CO2 than today?

What this data shows is that CO2 did not drive the climate of the planet so it is 100% relevant to today. It shows the climate is not sensitive to CO2.