CDZ Second Amendment Rights Must be Complete and Uncondional!

[Jarlaxle]

When you people get over the shock of having to face reality, just let me know.

The intent of this thread is to make it crystal clear that paying the price of dozens of little children murdered in their classrooms is a price that has to be paid for upholding your 2nd. amendment.

Concealed carry on not, the children won't appreciate the difference.

So back to the topic: What possible gun laws can be enacted?

Translation: it's a troll thread.

 

[otto105]

There can be no restrictions on any person's right to buy or sell any guns or any number of guns they choose.
This could present risks to society in America but the risks need to be accepted as necessary for the upholding of the intent of the 2nd. amendment. If any American objects to the sacred rights as stated by the 2nd. amendment then they have the option of purchasing their own weapons with which to defend themselves from harm.

The extreme example: A person released from prison who has murdered with his gun has the right to walk straight across the street from the prison and purchase a gun or guns. The only thing stopping him would be a background check being required to purchase a gun.

On the surface it could seem to be counter-productive to a peaceful society. It might be but there is no legitimate means to stop him unless the 2nd. amendment's unconditional rights are infringed upon.

And so for those who are hesitant to accept the full and complete rights as spelled out by their 2nd. amendment, is there any possible law that could be enacted that could curtail the ex-criminal's rights?

I say there is none! The 2nd. amendment isn't open for compromise for any reason or for any socialist cause.

Opinions?

Your full of shit.

 

[JoeBlow]

Sung to the Dire Straights tune "I Want My MTV".

I Want My WMD!

If the government can outshoot the population, then we have nothing to protect our Constitution with.

 

[danielpalos]

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[otto105]

Sung to the Dire Straights tune "I Want My MTV".

I Want My WMD!

If the government can outshoot the population, then we have nothing to protect our Constitution with.

Really, you going to outshot a nuke with yer little pistol????

 

[peacefan]

There can be no restrictions on any person's right to buy or sell any guns or any number of guns they choose.
This could present risks to society in America but the risks need to be accepted as necessary for the upholding of the intent of the 2nd. amendment. If any American objects to the sacred rights as stated by the 2nd. amendment then they have the option of purchasing their own weapons with which to defend themselves from harm.

The extreme example: A person released from prison who has murdered with his gun has the right to walk straight across the street from the prison and purchase a gun or guns. The only thing stopping him would be a background check being required to purchase a gun.

On the surface it could seem to be counter-productive to a peaceful society. It might be but there is no legitimate means to stop him unless the 2nd. amendment's unconditional rights are infringed upon.

And so for those who are hesitant to accept the full and complete rights as spelled out by their 2nd. amendment, is there any possible law that could be enacted that could curtail the ex-criminal's rights?

I say there is none! The 2nd. amendment isn't open for compromise for any reason or for any socialist cause.

Opinions?

people like you are responsible for all the innocent deaths related to gun crimes in the US.
you are despicable and completely stupid.

to call the 2nd amendment 'sacred' is also a sign of severe mental and spiritual and socialogical instability.

 

[Donald H]

There can be no restrictions on any person's right to buy or sell any guns or any number of guns they choose.
This could present risks to society in America but the risks need to be accepted as necessary for the upholding of the intent of the 2nd. amendment. If any American objects to the sacred rights as stated by the 2nd. amendment then they have the option of purchasing their own weapons with which to defend themselves from harm.

The extreme example: A person released from prison who has murdered with his gun has the right to walk straight across the street from the prison and purchase a gun or guns. The only thing stopping him would be a background check being required to purchase a gun.

On the surface it could seem to be counter-productive to a peaceful society. It might be but there is no legitimate means to stop him unless the 2nd. amendment's unconditional rights are infringed upon.

And so for those who are hesitant to accept the full and complete rights as spelled out by their 2nd. amendment, is there any possible law that could be enacted that could curtail the ex-criminal's rights?

I say there is none! The 2nd. amendment isn't open for compromise for any reason or for any socialist cause.

Opinions?

people like you are responsible for all the innocent deaths related to gun crimes in the US.
you are despicable and completely stupid.

to call the 2nd amendment 'sacred' is also a sign of severe mental and spiritual and socialogical instability.

You missed the sarcasm but never mind.

 

[danielpalos]

Well regulated militia of our State and of the United States have literal recourse to our Second Amendment; only the unorganized militia as Individuals of the People complain about gun control laws enacted by their Civil authority for the social and general welfare of the populace.

 

[JoeBlow]

Sung to the Dire Straights tune "I Want My MTV".

I Want My WMD!

If the government can outshoot the population, then we have nothing to protect our Constitution with.

Really, you going to outshot a nuke with yer little pistol????

That's why we need some WMD ourselves.

 

[peacefan]

There can be no restrictions on any person's right to buy or sell any guns or any number of guns they choose.
This could present risks to society in America but the risks need to be accepted as necessary for the upholding of the intent of the 2nd. amendment. If any American objects to the sacred rights as stated by the 2nd. amendment then they have the option of purchasing their own weapons with which to defend themselves from harm.

The extreme example: A person released from prison who has murdered with his gun has the right to walk straight across the street from the prison and purchase a gun or guns. The only thing stopping him would be a background check being required to purchase a gun.

On the surface it could seem to be counter-productive to a peaceful society. It might be but there is no legitimate means to stop him unless the 2nd. amendment's unconditional rights are infringed upon.

And so for those who are hesitant to accept the full and complete rights as spelled out by their 2nd. amendment, is there any possible law that could be enacted that could curtail the ex-criminal's rights?

I say there is none! The 2nd. amendment isn't open for compromise for any reason or for any socialist cause.

Opinions?

people like you are responsible for all the innocent deaths related to gun crimes in the US.
you are despicable and completely stupid.

to call the 2nd amendment 'sacred' is also a sign of severe mental and spiritual and socialogical instability.

You missed the sarcasm but never mind.

if it's truly sarcasm, then i apologize for my remarks.

 

[otto105]

Sung to the Dire Straights tune "I Want My MTV".

I Want My WMD!

If the government can outshoot the population, then we have nothing to protect our Constitution with.

Really, you going to outshot a nuke with yer little pistol????

That's why we need some WMD ourselves.

Fail

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Really, you going to outshot a nuke with yer little pistol????

The government is going to use nukes on us?

 

[danielpalos]

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States. Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well!

 

[otto105]

Really, you going to outshot a nuke with yer little pistol????

The government is going to use nukes on us?

How did you come to that conclusion?