- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,463
- 32,437
- 2,300
Reform can work yes.
However Cincinnati didn't remove 50% of the police budget and call it "reform".
They made legitimate changes... not just remove half their budget and think that is a good thing
Know the difference their champ.
And BTW - many municipal law enforcement have already adopted many of the ground breaking reforms Cincy did years ago.
Seattle isn't simply going to cut funding and nothing else .
That's exactly what they are voting for.
1. Cut funding
2. ?????
3. Effective low impact policing?
We can see how it has worked elsewhere.
The 2018 crime rate in Cincinnati, OH is 518 (City-Data.com crime index), which is 1.9 times greater than the U.S. average. It was higher than in 96.3% U.S. cities.
And Cincinnati didn't cut the funding for their PD by 50% either. Fewer cops = more crime. Unavoidable.
Cincinnati is not Seattle and Washington state is not Ohio, meaning the laws are different, the governing i different and the circumstances are different. Meaning what works in Cinci or anywhere else might not work in Seattle. The Seattle city council wants to cut PD funding for the rest of this year by 50%. There's no word about what their plans are to maintain law and order, frankly I suspect they don't have any beyond the wistful return to the "summer of love". Good luck with that. I know of no example in history where a big drop in your police force did not result in a significant boost in crime.
Fewer cops does not mean more crime. It means they are freed up to not go on "mental health" call as people actually trained in that can do that.
"Fewer cops does not mean more crime."
Show me one place where a city had fewer cops out there without more crime. You are lying sir.
About those mental health calls, how many of them are some kind of 'domestic disturbances' where somebody has a knife or a gun and is somewhat overly-excited? You wanna send a social worker out for that? I dunno if that is the answer, although I wouldn't doubt there are many other cases that do not require a uniformed cop with a gun. I kinda doubt a major city like Seattle can get by with half of it's police force though.
To me, the big thing with police misconduct is the lack of accountability. You just can't allow a bad cop to stay on your police force, and that occurs way too often in our major city PDs. Which are run by the democrats in almost all cases. Bad cops should be prosecuted or fired if the evidence warrants it, depending on the seriousness of the incident in question. And past history has to be considered. And none of this immunity stuff either, a badge doesn't give you the privilege to beatup or shoot somebody.
OTOH, when confronted by the police you need to STFU and comply with his directions. And you can expect to be shot if you make a move that could reasonably be construed as threatening. The cop has a right to go home to his wife and kids too.
The ironic thing is most of the issues that create the police mentality of being more important than everyone else comes from large cities under democratic control, with their excessive rules and regulations.
So cops can park in front of hydrants and bus stops overnight, but regular people can't.
They can park all over the place by their precincts, but regular people can't
They can keep firearms at home for their protection without spending money and time, but regular people can't.
Police and government employees were meant to be civil SERVANTS, not a new class of knights/nobility with more perks than the rest of us.
So why are you arguing to end that?
I am saying police need to be held more accountable and to a higher standard, but defunding them is pknopp, i.e. retarded
Fyi I am calling you a fucking retard if you are having trouble getting the point