Seahawks SUCK !!!!

[HUGGY]

Count the weeks since Lynch's minor surgery on Thanksgiving day. It is reasonable to assume that Marshawn won't be really needed till the second week of the playoffs. That's about 4 weeks past what is normally needed for complete recovery for the recovery of Lynch's surgery.

When he finally steps back on the field Lynch's hernia should be fully healed and his legs fresh as a daisy.

In all likelihood we will be playing the Panthers. If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks I doubt the Panthers can beat Seattle with a healthy Lynch added to the recent league leading output of Wilson to Baldwin, Kearse, Lockett and Willson.

Then all that will be left is the rubber match with AZ for the third appearance in three seasons in the Super Bowl.

I'm not entirely dismissing the winner of the NFC East but I doubt we will need Lynch to beat Washington. In any case that decision is a month away and if our back was truly against a wall Lynch could probably play tomorrow.

He, Lynch, will certainly be available in 4 weeks. The typical time to rehab Lynch's repairs is 5-6 weeks.

 

[Montrovant]

Count the weeks since Lynch's minor surgery on Thanksgiving day. It is reasonable to assume that Marshawn won't be really needed till the second week of the playoffs. That's about 4 weeks past what is normally needed for complete recovery for the recovery of Lynch's surgery.

When he finally steps back on the field Lynch's hernia should be fully healed and his legs fresh as a daisy.

In all likelihood we will be playing the Panthers. If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks I doubt the Panthers can beat Seattle with a healthy Lynch added to the recent league leading output of Wilson to Baldwin, Kearse, Lockett and Willson.

Then all that will be left is the rubber match with AZ for the third appearance in three seasons in the Super Bowl.

I'm not entirely dismissing the winner of the NFC East but I doubt we will need Lynch to beat Washington. In any case that decision is a month away and if our back was truly against a wall Lynch could probably play tomorrow.

He, Lynch, will certainly be available in 4 weeks. The typical time to rehab Lynch's repairs is 5-6 weeks.

Wilson has been playing very well of late, but historic?

 

[HUGGY]

Count the weeks since Lynch's minor surgery on Thanksgiving day. It is reasonable to assume that Marshawn won't be really needed till the second week of the playoffs. That's about 4 weeks past what is normally needed for complete recovery for the recovery of Lynch's surgery.

When he finally steps back on the field Lynch's hernia should be fully healed and his legs fresh as a daisy.

In all likelihood we will be playing the Panthers. If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks I doubt the Panthers can beat Seattle with a healthy Lynch added to the recent league leading output of Wilson to Baldwin, Kearse, Lockett and Willson.

Then all that will be left is the rubber match with AZ for the third appearance in three seasons in the Super Bowl.

I'm not entirely dismissing the winner of the NFC East but I doubt we will need Lynch to beat Washington. In any case that decision is a month away and if our back was truly against a wall Lynch could probably play tomorrow.

He, Lynch, will certainly be available in 4 weeks. The typical time to rehab Lynch's repairs is 5-6 weeks.

Wilson has been playing very well of late, but historic?

Keeping in mind that it is just professional football, yes, historic.

 

[Montrovant]

Count the weeks since Lynch's minor surgery on Thanksgiving day. It is reasonable to assume that Marshawn won't be really needed till the second week of the playoffs. That's about 4 weeks past what is normally needed for complete recovery for the recovery of Lynch's surgery.

When he finally steps back on the field Lynch's hernia should be fully healed and his legs fresh as a daisy.

In all likelihood we will be playing the Panthers. If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks I doubt the Panthers can beat Seattle with a healthy Lynch added to the recent league leading output of Wilson to Baldwin, Kearse, Lockett and Willson.

Then all that will be left is the rubber match with AZ for the third appearance in three seasons in the Super Bowl.

I'm not entirely dismissing the winner of the NFC East but I doubt we will need Lynch to beat Washington. In any case that decision is a month away and if our back was truly against a wall Lynch could probably play tomorrow.

He, Lynch, will certainly be available in 4 weeks. The typical time to rehab Lynch's repairs is 5-6 weeks.

Wilson has been playing very well of late, but historic?

Keeping in mind that it is just professional football, yes, historic.

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

 

[antiquity]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

 

[Montrovant]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

Tops in the NFL the last 4 weeks isn't historic, though. Is that the best 4 week QBR ever? I'm not saying Wilson isn't playing great recently, I'm questioning the use of the word historic.

 

[antiquity]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

Tops in the NFL the last 4 weeks isn't historic, though. Is that the best 4 week QBR ever? I'm not saying Wilson isn't playing great recently, I'm questioning the use of the word historic.

The question you asked in the post I responded to was....'What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?'

Now if you want to compare Wilson historically, one would have to go back to the beginning of the National Football league, before the merger. But then that would cause many conflicting and descriptive comparisons because the game wasn't played in though days the same. For instance passing yards and winning percentages of those teams. Different styles and strategies of players and coaches. The rules were different. The passing game before the merger was not the dominate factor, it was the the AFC the made the passing game what it in today's game and it was that style of the AFC play that changed the entire NFL.
For instance you can't compare Van Brocklin, Sonny Jergensen or YA Tittle with Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. Their and their coaches approach to the game was completely different. Teams that relied on the pass and teams that relies on the run can not be compared as you would be comparing apples to oranges.
Does Russell Wilson have any thing in common with Tom Brady...I think so but it doesn't show up in the passing stats, it shows up in how they both are team leaders and the way they can lead their respective team on the field. In other words they both are winners.

 

[Montrovant]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

Tops in the NFL the last 4 weeks isn't historic, though. Is that the best 4 week QBR ever? I'm not saying Wilson isn't playing great recently, I'm questioning the use of the word historic.

The question you asked in the post I responded to was....'What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?'

Now if you want to compare Wilson historically, one would have to go back to the beginning of the National Football league, before the merger. But then that would cause many conflicting and descriptive comparisons because the game wasn't played in though days the same. For instance passing yards and winning percentages of those teams. Different styles and strategies of players and coaches. The rules were different. The passing game before the merger was not the dominate factor, it was the the AFC the made the passing game what it in today's game and it was that style of the AFC play that changed the entire NFL.
For instance you can't compare Van Brocklin, Sonny Jergensen or YA Tittle with Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. Their and their coaches approach to the game was completely different. Teams that relied on the pass and teams that relies on the run can not be compared as you would be comparing apples to oranges.
Does Russell Wilson have any thing in common with Tom Brady...I think so but it doesn't show up in the passing stats, it shows up in how they both are team leaders and the way they can lead their respective team on the field. In other words they both are winners.

Maybe you missed the whole conversation between me and Huggy. He said, "If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks". I questioned his use of the word historic. He replied with basically nothing, just repeating that Wilson's play has been historic. The context was in the last 4 weeks, hence my question of what Wilson has done in recent weeks.

If someone says that a QBs play over a 4 week stretch has been historic, I want to know how that QBs play compares to QBs of the past. If it isn't record tying or breaking, good or bad, I don't think historic is an appropriate word to use.

In this particular case, I expect it is just Huggy being Huggy, he likes to exaggerate the greatness of the Seahawks (or occasionally, when things aren't going well, exaggerate the bad play of same).

 

[HUGGY]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

Tops in the NFL the last 4 weeks isn't historic, though. Is that the best 4 week QBR ever? I'm not saying Wilson isn't playing great recently, I'm questioning the use of the word historic.

The question you asked in the post I responded to was....'What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?'

Now if you want to compare Wilson historically, one would have to go back to the beginning of the National Football league, before the merger. But then that would cause many conflicting and descriptive comparisons because the game wasn't played in though days the same. For instance passing yards and winning percentages of those teams. Different styles and strategies of players and coaches. The rules were different. The passing game before the merger was not the dominate factor, it was the the AFC the made the passing game what it in today's game and it was that style of the AFC play that changed the entire NFL.
For instance you can't compare Van Brocklin, Sonny Jergensen or YA Tittle with Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. Their and their coaches approach to the game was completely different. Teams that relied on the pass and teams that relies on the run can not be compared as you would be comparing apples to oranges.
Does Russell Wilson have any thing in common with Tom Brady...I think so but it doesn't show up in the passing stats, it shows up in how they both are team leaders and the way they can lead their respective team on the field. In other words they both are winners.

Maybe you missed the whole conversation between me and Huggy. He said, "If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks". I questioned his use of the word historic. He replied with basically nothing, just repeating that Wilson's play has been historic. The context was in the last 4 weeks, hence my question of what Wilson has done in recent weeks.

If someone says that a QBs play over a 4 week stretch has been historic, I want to know how that QBs play compares to QBs of the past. If it isn't record tying or breaking, good or bad, I don't think historic is an appropriate word to use.

In this particular case, I expect it is just Huggy being Huggy, he likes to exaggerate the greatness of the Seahawks (or occasionally, when things aren't going well, exaggerate the bad play of same).

Last week Wilson tied 3 other QBs with having thrown for at least three TDs and no interceptions in four consecutive games. That stretch of games was historic in that it had only been accomplished by three other QBs/teams.

This week Wilson embarked on a singular writing of history as he further accomplished the above feat as the ONLY QB to throw for at least three TDs in 5 successive games without a turnover. Again this feat was historic. NOW Wilson owns the record. I don't get the controversy in me labeling Wilson's accomplishments last week and this week as historic. The accomplishments I have been discussing are facts.

#1...One game of at least three TDs with no turnovers = somewhere near a thousand QBs/Teams.

#2....Two consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = somewhere in the several hundred QBs/Teams.

#3.....Three consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = probably somewhere a dozen QBs/Teams.

#4....Four consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = Four QBs/Teams including Russell Wilson

#5....Five consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = Only Russell Wilson.

Maybe the previous poster doesn't include the above category as worthy of being historic. I would offer that #'s 1,2 as not that big of a deal. I contend that #'s 3,4 and certainly #5 as being noteworthy and historic.

 

[Montrovant]

In what way? What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?

How about about having the highest QBR in the NFL of 110. Three points higher than anyone else.
For the recent weeks yeah he has surpassed all other NFL quarterbacks....... In the past four games Wilson has 16 TD, no picks and a QBR of 145.9. All tops.

Tops in the NFL the last 4 weeks isn't historic, though. Is that the best 4 week QBR ever? I'm not saying Wilson isn't playing great recently, I'm questioning the use of the word historic.

The question you asked in the post I responded to was....'What has he done that has surpassed other QBs in recent weeks?'

Now if you want to compare Wilson historically, one would have to go back to the beginning of the National Football league, before the merger. But then that would cause many conflicting and descriptive comparisons because the game wasn't played in though days the same. For instance passing yards and winning percentages of those teams. Different styles and strategies of players and coaches. The rules were different. The passing game before the merger was not the dominate factor, it was the the AFC the made the passing game what it in today's game and it was that style of the AFC play that changed the entire NFL.
For instance you can't compare Van Brocklin, Sonny Jergensen or YA Tittle with Peyton Manning or Tom Brady. Their and their coaches approach to the game was completely different. Teams that relied on the pass and teams that relies on the run can not be compared as you would be comparing apples to oranges.
Does Russell Wilson have any thing in common with Tom Brady...I think so but it doesn't show up in the passing stats, it shows up in how they both are team leaders and the way they can lead their respective team on the field. In other words they both are winners.

Maybe you missed the whole conversation between me and Huggy. He said, "If Wilson can continue his historic play of the last 4 weeks". I questioned his use of the word historic. He replied with basically nothing, just repeating that Wilson's play has been historic. The context was in the last 4 weeks, hence my question of what Wilson has done in recent weeks.

If someone says that a QBs play over a 4 week stretch has been historic, I want to know how that QBs play compares to QBs of the past. If it isn't record tying or breaking, good or bad, I don't think historic is an appropriate word to use.

In this particular case, I expect it is just Huggy being Huggy, he likes to exaggerate the greatness of the Seahawks (or occasionally, when things aren't going well, exaggerate the bad play of same).

Last week Wilson tied 3 other QBs with having thrown for at least three TDs and no interceptions in four consecutive games. That stretch of games was historic in that it had only been accomplished by three other QBs/teams.

This week Wilson embarked on a singular writing of history as he further accomplished the above feat as the ONLY QB to throw for at least three TDs in 5 successive games without a turnover. Again this feat was historic. NOW Wilson owns the record. I don't get the controversy in me labeling Wilson's accomplishments last week and this week as historic. The accomplishments I have been discussing are facts.

#1...One game of at least three TDs with no turnovers = somewhere near a thousand QBs/Teams.

#2....Two consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = somewhere in the several hundred QBs/Teams.

#3.....Three consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = probably somewhere a dozen QBs/Teams.

#4....Four consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = Four QBs/Teams including Russell Wilson

#5....Five consecutive games of at least three TDs with no turnovers = Only Russell Wilson.

Maybe the previous poster doesn't include the above category as worthy of being historic. I would offer that #'s 1,2 as not that big of a deal. I contend that #'s 3,4 and certainly #5 as being noteworthy and historic.

Well there you go! You showed why his play can be considered historic. Before this post you didn't say why, just that it was. What, I should just take your word for it?

 

[antiquity]

What? Have you ever known Huggy to be wrong?

 

[antiquity]

Now that the Cleveland game is over...and with Arizona win against the Eagles, Seattle being in the playoffs is set. The only thing left is whether Seattle gets the number 5 spot or the number six spot.
Right now it looks like Seattle will most likely play the Number four team which will be the Winner of the NFC East. Most likely the winner of the Skins/Eagles game. The number three spot is still up for grabs but I think Green Bay has the inside track and they will play Minnesota again in that wild card game. If the Vikings did finish ahead of GB then Seattle would drop to the 6th wild card team because of the Packers win over the Seahawks first game of the season. Green Bay goes to Arizona this coming weekend would could be a very interesting game and finishes the season at home against the Vikings. The Vikings play at home against the Giants and then maybe the big decider against the Pack.
Seattle cannot afford to lose either upcoming games if they want to secure the number five wildcard spot.
The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.
Will the Cardinals rest some of their players...more than likely. Too much still at stake for Seattle if it come down to the winner of the GB/Viking game taking the NFC north title and number three playoff spot leaving Seattle having to play Green Bay in Green Bay again.

 

[HUGGY]

Bad news for the Cardinals. Honey Badger out for remainder of season. He is/was arguably their best player in DB. Not wanting to get ahead of the "one game at a time" thing but this is huge. More important than us losing Jimmy Graham. Now that our RBs have shown they can win by committee, 182 yds rushing on Sunday, more important than Lynch getting back.

Tyrann Mathieu has been the difference in many AZ wins. Without him it is likely Seattle would be at least 10-4 and AZ 9-5 going into the second to last game of the season. AZ beat the Hawks 39-32 week 10... 6 games ago just before our O-Line had matured into a unit Wilson could depend upon. Time to review the game on the Game Pass and see what effect the healthy Honey Badger had on the outcome.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

 

[HUGGY]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

Nigga.....PUUULLEEEEZE!!!!

I just watched last Thursday night's game last night. Keenum is a joke! Both the Rams QB and TBay's Winston played just simply awful. By halftime neither QB had completed 25% of their tosses.

I hope Fischer studies the video of the opener and get's it stuck in his brain that his Rams have a snowball's chance.

I just pray that we go up by 4 scores or more in the first half so we can get Sherman and Thomas and a few others like for instinct a certain Russell Wilson off the field and out of harm's way in periods 3,4.

The Rams have absolutely nothing to gain from trying hard to beat the Hawks on Sunday. Actually they have MORE to gain in draft picks by mailing it in.

Wilson, Baldwin, Kearse and Lockett are laser focused as QB ratings and other records are falling left and right.

If I were you I would go to a movie or something while the game/dissection is happening. There is no need to put yourself through that much trauma.

 

[HUGGY]

What? Have you ever known Huggy to be wrong?

I WAS wrong ONCE! Then I discovered I was actually right. Thankfully I came to my senses!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

Nigga.....PUUULLEEEEZE!!!!

I just watched last Thursday night's game last night. Keenum is a joke! Both the Rams QB and TBay's Winston played just simply awful. By halftime neither QB had completed 25% of their tosses.

I hope Fischer studies the video of the opener and get's it stuck in his brain that his Rams have a snowball's chance.

I just pray that we go up by 4 scores or more in the first half so we can get Sherman and Thomas and a few others like for instinct a certain Russell Wilson off the field and out of harm's way in periods 3,4.

The Rams have absolutely nothing to gain from trying hard to beat the Hawks on Sunday. Actually they have MORE to gain in draft picks by mailing it in.

Wilson, Baldwin, Kearse and Lockett are laser focused as QB ratings and other records are falling left and right.

If I were you I would go to a movie or something while the game/dissection is happening. There is no need to put yourself through that much trauma.

you really should be worried about this game.As antiquity said,they wont be pushovers like the Ravens and Browns were and they always play them close down there just like he said.They never get blown out.The fact it is an NFC west opponent they will play them tough.

sure the hawks will win I have no doubt but this is WHY you should be concerned more than anything.while they will probably win the Rams could very well with their physical defense they have,put a big hurt on some key players as the packers did in the NFC title game.

are you forgetting I WANT the Rams to always lose each week?

I have nothing to lose either way by the outcome of this game,I could care less either way who wins.I of course want the Rams to lose but if they win,makes no difference to me.either way I am a winner this time around for this game the fact I dont like either one of these teams now.

 

[HUGGY]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

Nigga.....PUUULLEEEEZE!!!!

I just watched last Thursday night's game last night. Keenum is a joke! Both the Rams QB and TBay's Winston played just simply awful. By halftime neither QB had completed 25% of their tosses.

I hope Fischer studies the video of the opener and get's it stuck in his brain that his Rams have a snowball's chance.

I just pray that we go up by 4 scores or more in the first half so we can get Sherman and Thomas and a few others like for instinct a certain Russell Wilson off the field and out of harm's way in periods 3,4.

The Rams have absolutely nothing to gain from trying hard to beat the Hawks on Sunday. Actually they have MORE to gain in draft picks by mailing it in.

Wilson, Baldwin, Kearse and Lockett are laser focused as QB ratings and other records are falling left and right.

If I were you I would go to a movie or something while the game/dissection is happening. There is no need to put yourself through that much trauma.

you really should be worried about this game.As antiquity said,they wont be pushovers like the Ravens and Browns were and they always play them close down there just like he said.They never get blown out.The fact it is an NFC west opponent they will play them tough.

sure the hawks will win I have no doubt but this is WHY you should be concerned more than anything.while they will probably win the Rams could very well with their physical defense they have,put a big hurt on some key players as the packers did in the NFC title game.

are you forgetting I WANT the Rams to always lose each week?

I have nothing to lose either way by the outcome of this game,I could care less either way who wins.I of course want the Rams to lose but if they win,makes no difference to me.either way I am a winner this time around for this game the fact I dont like either one of these teams now.

Are you SERIOUS ???? Do you REALLY think Carroll has forgotten how banged up our DBs were in SB 49 ???

We should have spanked Brady's ass like a red headed step child. NO WAY Carroll allows THAT to bite us in the balls again.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

Nigga.....PUUULLEEEEZE!!!!

I just watched last Thursday night's game last night. Keenum is a joke! Both the Rams QB and TBay's Winston played just simply awful. By halftime neither QB had completed 25% of their tosses.

I hope Fischer studies the video of the opener and get's it stuck in his brain that his Rams have a snowball's chance.

I just pray that we go up by 4 scores or more in the first half so we can get Sherman and Thomas and a few others like for instinct a certain Russell Wilson off the field and out of harm's way in periods 3,4.

The Rams have absolutely nothing to gain from trying hard to beat the Hawks on Sunday. Actually they have MORE to gain in draft picks by mailing it in.

Wilson, Baldwin, Kearse and Lockett are laser focused as QB ratings and other records are falling left and right.

If I were you I would go to a movie or something while the game/dissection is happening. There is no need to put yourself through that much trauma.

you really should be worried about this game.As antiquity said,they wont be pushovers like the Ravens and Browns were and they always play them close down there just like he said.They never get blown out.The fact it is an NFC west opponent they will play them tough.

sure the hawks will win I have no doubt but this is WHY you should be concerned more than anything.while they will probably win the Rams could very well with their physical defense they have,put a big hurt on some key players as the packers did in the NFC title game.

are you forgetting I WANT the Rams to always lose each week?

I have nothing to lose either way by the outcome of this game,I could care less either way who wins.I of course want the Rams to lose but if they win,makes no difference to me.either way I am a winner this time around for this game the fact I dont like either one of these teams now.

Are you SERIOUS ???? Do you REALLY think Carroll has forgotten how banged up our DBs were in SB 49 ???

We should have spanked Brady's ass like a red headed step child. NO WAY Carroll allows THAT to bite us in the balls again.

so you saying he is going to bench his starters then? thats the ONLY way they are assured of not getting hurt again.

 

[HUGGY]

The Rams always play the Hawks tough and they won't be a push over like the Ravens or the Browns.

That is so much true.I watched the Rams game last thursday and ever since they got smart and benched Nick Foles for Case Keenum that offense is clicking now so they are not going to be pushovers for the Hawks at all like i was saying they would be a couple weeks ago.

Its lucky for you Huggy this game is in seattle because they have been playing well and looking good since Keenum took over.

The Rams I have a feeling are going to give the Hawks a run for their money same as the Cardinals will. If anything the Cardinals will be an easier game for them since they will rest their starters. The Rams game for the Seahawks could be a lot like the Steelers game where it becomes a shootout.

Case Keenum just may be the next Kurt Warner in the making for the Rams which hopefully is the case for me since the 2016 season they will be the LOS ANGELES Rams for sure this time around.yahoo!!

Nigga.....PUUULLEEEEZE!!!!

I just watched last Thursday night's game last night. Keenum is a joke! Both the Rams QB and TBay's Winston played just simply awful. By halftime neither QB had completed 25% of their tosses.

I hope Fischer studies the video of the opener and get's it stuck in his brain that his Rams have a snowball's chance.

I just pray that we go up by 4 scores or more in the first half so we can get Sherman and Thomas and a few others like for instinct a certain Russell Wilson off the field and out of harm's way in periods 3,4.

The Rams have absolutely nothing to gain from trying hard to beat the Hawks on Sunday. Actually they have MORE to gain in draft picks by mailing it in.

Wilson, Baldwin, Kearse and Lockett are laser focused as QB ratings and other records are falling left and right.

If I were you I would go to a movie or something while the game/dissection is happening. There is no need to put yourself through that much trauma.

you really should be worried about this game.As antiquity said,they wont be pushovers like the Ravens and Browns were and they always play them close down there just like he said.They never get blown out.The fact it is an NFC west opponent they will play them tough.

sure the hawks will win I have no doubt but this is WHY you should be concerned more than anything.while they will probably win the Rams could very well with their physical defense they have,put a big hurt on some key players as the packers did in the NFC title game.

are you forgetting I WANT the Rams to always lose each week?

I have nothing to lose either way by the outcome of this game,I could care less either way who wins.I of course want the Rams to lose but if they win,makes no difference to me.either way I am a winner this time around for this game the fact I dont like either one of these teams now.

Are you SERIOUS ???? Do you REALLY think Carroll has forgotten how banged up our DBs were in SB 49 ???

We should have spanked Brady's ass like a red headed step child. NO WAY Carroll allows THAT to bite us in the balls again.

so you saying he is going to bench his starters then? thats the ONLY way they are assured of not getting hurt again.

What I am saying is that Wilson just needs to keep doing what he has been doing but try to switch it up and instead of talking about "how you finish" look at the end of the 2nd qtr as the end of the game for the players we need to protect. In that light I believe Carroll and Bevell will put in a higher average of deep passes banking on Wilson's recent efficiency especially with Baldwin and Lockett.

What has been the HYF montra has given the team 4 qtrs to win. Lately though Wilson has scored 3-4 TDs in the first half. This has forced the opponents to take huge chances to try to stay in the games. This has led to several ints recently. It was my observation that Keenum was highly inaccurate against the Bucs. If the Buccaneers had good DBs they could have shredded the Rams with ints. If the Rams play like they did last week and with the studying Sherman and Thomas do I see a very likely interception fest.

From what I have seen this season the worst injuries have happened non contact. Rawls' broken foot happened just landing awkwardly. Lynch's stomach injury was a long time coming. He just had a torn groin muscle that kept getting worse. Jimmy Graham's boo boo again was just an awkward slide during a tackle that normally should not have been any problem.

I agree with you that the Hawks SHOULD win the game. The REAL pressure will be to get so far ahead in the first half that the Rams lose their will to compete. We don't want to have some stupid battle in the 4th qtr to save a win.