What has happened to the great rivalries in the NFC West?
SF is now Santa Clara.. The 9ers have evaporated as a useful team to hate on. Now they are like these cripples that we have to feel sorry for.
The Rams don't even like the city they represent..nuff said.
The Cardinals don't even HAVE a city. How lame is that?
food for thought for everyone that reads this. When the Cards moved to Arizona,within four years they moved to the NFC west which makes perfect sense obviously. The Rams have not been playing on the west coast for 20 years now yet they are still in the NFC west?
In talking to Ram fans out there in california they always held out hope they would be back just like the oakland raiders came back to their city because they always thought even way back then, the lease agreement sounded very fishy and not concrete unlike with the cardinals in arizona.
the fact the Rams NEVER did the logical thing and move to the NFC central after all this time like they should have years ago makes you pause and go hmmm.
I think the owners saw the same thing. that the Rams could get out of their lease agreement with the city they have and planned to have them back all this time.Only thing that makes any sense at all whatsoever why they never moved them to the NFC central like they did with the cardinals to the NFC west in 2002.
speaking of rivalrys,Good thing the Rams will be back in LA next year because then an old classic rivalry from the days of old will be back.Its been dead the last 20 years.with them back in LA though,it gets renewed.it will be like the packers and bears/chiefs and raiders.No matter how terrible those teams are playing that year,the games always mean somethign between both the players but more importantly,the fans.
Sad performance Monday night
indeed,this team needs to start planning for NEXT year.they are clearly not the same team from the last two superbowls.their offensive line never played pathetic with teams like the bears who dont have a defense and against the Lions who dont play well outdoors.