Seahawks SUCK !!!!

[antiquity]

Actually this game was a major breakout for Seattle wide receivers. If Seattle can continue that trend they will be tough. I think Baldwin going into this game was ranked 65 in wide receivers... I have no idea where Kearse was ranked but it can't be very good. A very balanced attack with a very good defense will be hard to beat the rest of the season.

 

[HUGGY]

I just really hope Green Bay stumbles this weekend. Rodgers passes have been getting progressively less accurate over the last 6 games. The Hawks seriously need Arron to have a bad day.

 

[HUGGY]

Taken from Seahawks dot com:

"The two sides of Russell Wilson are about to become one at CenturyLink Field on Sunday afternoon.
Prior to kickoff of the Seahawks’ oh-so-important game against the NFC West-rival San Francisco 49ers, the team’s third-year quarterback will be presented with the trophy for being voted the team’s Man of the Year, which is presented annually to a player that represents stellar performance on the field and in the community.
Once the game begins, Wilson has the opportunity to go where no quarterback has gone during the NFL’s Super Bowl era that began in 1966. He is currently tied with Hall of Fame QB Dan Marino and Matt Ryan of the Atlanta Falcons for the most victories in their first three seasons. With a win over the 49ers, Wilson would have 34 and be alone atop that list."

Wilson becoming the winningest QB in his first three seasons since 1966 is a big deal.

I can't tell you all how lucky we in the Seattle area are to have russell Wilson our QB,

 

[Neil N. Blowme]

Seahawks suck really good these days.

 

[antiquity]

I just really hope Green Bay stumbles this weekend. Rodgers passes have been getting progressively less accurate over the last 6 games. The Hawks seriously need Arron to have a bad day.

You got your wish and the Packs lost means the Seahawks, if they can win out, will be the #1 seed in the NFC.

 

[HUGGY]

I just really hope Green Bay stumbles this weekend. Rodgers passes have been getting progressively less accurate over the last 6 games. The Hawks seriously need Arron to have a bad day.

You got your wish and the Packs lost means the Seahawks, if they can win out, will be the #1 seed in the NFC.

La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la

 

[HUGGY]

Carroll seems a bit over-confident going into the last reg season game.

Nigga PPPUUUUUUULLEEEEEZZZ!!!!!

Ya just beat a 4th string QB......

 

[LA RAM FAN]

okay clear this up for me Huggy cause I'm confused why the seahawks, after they beat the LAMBS next weekend,will secure homefield advantage.I kept hearing the announcers say that with a victory next week against the Lambs,that they get the number one seed,how is that?

I mean the dallas cowboys when they trounce on the hopeless redskins next week,they will end the season with the exact same record as the seahawks at 12-4.so how is it that the seahawks end up with the number one seed when they will finish up with the same record? that makes no sense.I dont get it since the cowboys beat them earlier in the year.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Carroll seems a bit over-confident going into the last reg season game.

Nigga PPPUUUUUUULLEEEEEZZZ!!!!!

Ya just beat a 4th string QB......

third but whos counting..

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Unlike the announcers from last night,I'm STILL not all that impressed with the seahawks. they were talking all last night about how their offense has gotten things together now.

Oh please,get real,give me a break.this is the first blowout they have had against a team since they beat the Giants who have a washed up quarterback that has been playing for them.how does blowing out a team down to a third stringer count as the offense now playing well?please.

thats what i said would happen. a third string quarterback,you are going to have lots of three and outs so the defense is eventually going to get tired like it did.

see I am still not impressed with the seahawks unlike they are because while their defense has finally gotten their act together in the second half,the offense has done jack squat against a team with a top notch quarterback.

Let just take a look at their last 9 games they have had where they won 8 of them and who the opponents were and who they quarterbacks are they faced.
1.The chokeland faiders. they BARELY beat them. at home no less.big deal.who hasnt beat that team?.good thing they scored touchdowns in that game because their defense almost gave it away in the end against a ROOKIE QB no less .an embarrassing win for them.
2.The Giants.a team in shambles with a washed up has been quarterback,big deal.
3.they lost this game so we wont discuss it..
4.cards at home.an unimpressive 19-13 win against a backup QB.
5.san fran on the road.another unimpressive 19-13 win against a Qb that has meltdowns.big wow.
6.The Eagles.a 24-14 win,a win against another washed up has been quarterback,big deal.
7.san fran again.a measely 17 points and coming again against a QB that may not even be there next year.
8.cards again.their first blowout since the Giants game comes againsta third stringer because the defense was on the filed all day because of so many three and outs by the offense having to work with a third stringer.

Next week they will be facing another crappy team with ANOTHER washed up quarterback so they again will win against another unimpressive quarterback. so scoring a bunch of points against them will not be impressive either.

I am not sold they will win the superbowl this year because you have to assume they will be playing the cowboys for the NFC title.

The cowboys have not gone into their usual meltdown at the end of the year like everybody was expecting them to and Romo caused them problems last time.they have proved they can beat them at the clink so it wont be easy.

and if they make it past the cowboys,then you know they will have to face the patriots in the superbowl and unlike last year,this game i dont see easy for them.The patriots are much better this year on defense and with a healthy gronkowski,he makes a big difference for them on offense.

If he stays healthy come superbowl time,they could struggle to win this game.the partriots match up well with them physically with a shut down corner in revis and a healthy wolford on defense as well not to mention that Tom Brady doesnt panic and get scared in big games no matter how bad the situation looks.

when they have to face Romo and Brady,if their offense doesnt perform the same way they did yesterday against the cardinals,its going to be very difficult for them to win the superbowl. agreed Huggy?

 

[Montrovant]

okay clear this up for me Huggy cause I'm confused why the seahawks, after they beat the LAMBS next weekend,will secure homefield advantage.I kept hearing the announcers say that with a victory next week against the Lambs,that they get the number one seed,how is that?

I mean the dallas cowboys when they trounce on the hopeless redskins next week,they will end the season with the exact same record as the seahawks at 12-4.so how is it that the seahawks end up with the number one seed when they will finish up with the same record? that makes no sense.I dont get it since the cowboys beat them earlier in the year.

It's because there is a tie of more than 2 teams. Currently Seattle, Dallas, Detroit and Green Bay are all 11-4. Because of that, and because all the teams do not have head to head matchups to go by, it goes to conference record.

If Seattle wins next week, they are assured of at least being tied for the best record. The only way for Dallas's win over Seattle to take precedence is if the GB/Detroit game ends in a tie. In that case, Dallas and Seattle could end up alone at 12-4 and it would go by the head to head meeting. Otherwise either GB or Detroit will be 12-4 and the best Dallas can do is be the worst conference record in a 3 way tie at 12-4.

I had to look at that myself.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

okay clear this up for me Huggy cause I'm confused why the seahawks, after they beat the LAMBS next weekend,will secure homefield advantage.I kept hearing the announcers say that with a victory next week against the Lambs,that they get the number one seed,how is that?

I mean the dallas cowboys when they trounce on the hopeless redskins next week,they will end the season with the exact same record as the seahawks at 12-4.so how is it that the seahawks end up with the number one seed when they will finish up with the same record? that makes no sense.I dont get it since the cowboys beat them earlier in the year.

It's because there is a tie of more than 2 teams. Currently Seattle, Dallas, Detroit and Green Bay are all 11-4. Because of that, and because all the teams do not have head to head matchups to go by, it goes to conference record.

If Seattle wins next week, they are assured of at least being tied for the best record. The only way for Dallas's win over Seattle to take precedence is if the GB/Detroit game ends in a tie. In that case, Dallas and Seattle could end up alone at 12-4 and it would go by the head to head meeting. Otherwise either GB or Detroit will be 12-4 and the best Dallas can do is be the worst conference record in a 3 way tie at 12-4.

I had to look at that myself.

okay thanks,i was wondering WHY the announcers kept saying something about green bay and detroit tying each other. i just took a look at the cowboys season this past year and i see all 4 of their losses were to NFC teams where the seahawks 4 losses,2 of them were to AFC teams so now i get it.lol

The seahawks defense is finally playing well and wilson had his worst game ever back then against them playing with no confidance back then but they'll make their adjustments this time.they barely lost that game and made many stupid mistakes that can easily be corrected so I dont see them having a problem with the cowboys at home.

they will have their hands full i believe when they face the pats and have to deal with tom brady though I really believe.He is a big game quarterback and they are better this year than last year.

the thing the hawks will have in their favor though is that it will be played in the desert in arizona which will be a home game for them being on the west coast and all.lol whenever they play the cards on the road,that game is almost a home game for them with half the crowd being seahawks fans as it was last night.

 

[Billo_Really]

Are we going to have another Denver vs Seahawk Super Bowl?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Are we going to have another Denver vs Seahawk Super Bowl?

Nope.its going to be seattle and new england,count on it. I find it funny that some people think the donkeys with a quarterback who panics in big games will actually go into boston and beat the patriots even though in every single game brady and manning have faced each other,the road team always lost.I have a feeling the nation will get what they wanted to see in last years superbowl as well.Brady unlike manning,does not panic in big games no matter how bad things look and they are much better this year than they were last year with the health of gronk,wolfork and the addition of revis thats why i am not so confidant of them winning the superbowl this year like i was last year.unless the pats get some other injurys to other key players in the upcoming weeks,i see the hawks struggling to win this superbowl this year.

 

[Billo_Really]

Nope.its going to be seattle and new england,count on it. I find it funny that some people think the donkeys with a quarterback who panics in big games will actually go into boston and beat the patriots even though in every single game brady and manning have faced each other,the road team always lost.I have a feeling the nation will get what they wanted to see in last years superbowl as well.Brady unlike manning,does not panic in big games no matter how bad things look and they are much better this year than they were last year with the health of gronk,wolfork and the addition of revis thats why i am not so confidant of them winning the superbowl this year like i was last year.unless the pats get some other injurys to other key players in the upcoming weeks,i see the hawks struggling to win this superbowl this year.

Brady's as old as Kobe!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Nope.its going to be seattle and new england,count on it. I find it funny that some people think the donkeys with a quarterback who panics in big games will actually go into boston and beat the patriots even though in every single game brady and manning have faced each other,the road team always lost.I have a feeling the nation will get what they wanted to see in last years superbowl as well.Brady unlike manning,does not panic in big games no matter how bad things look and they are much better this year than they were last year with the health of gronk,wolfork and the addition of revis thats why i am not so confidant of them winning the superbowl this year like i was last year.unless the pats get some other injurys to other key players in the upcoming weeks,i see the hawks struggling to win this superbowl this year.

Brady's as old as Kobe!

true but manning is one year older and each time they have faced each other in the playoffs,the road team has lost everytime.Brady has a much better team supporting him this year than last year or what manning had last year in the superbowl so brady doesnt have to do it all by himself which is pretty much what manning was stuck with last year missing so many key starters in that game.

thats why i could not believe there were so many fools here who actually thought mr chokester manning and the donkeys would actually win that game last year,did not take a genuis to see that the hawks had a major advantage with everybody healthy where the donkeys had key injurys.thats why the seahawks/broncos game was closer this year when they played because this past year,manning had all his players healthy this time around.

some people around here seem to think one person can win the entire game for you ignoring the fact its a TEAM game.

 

[HUGGY]

The Seattle offense didn't play the third string QB of the Cards. They played one of the best defenses in the NFL. Peterson believes he is the best corner in the NFL. He had his hands on Lynch right on the sideline halfway on the 80 plus TD run and Lynch flicked him off like a mosquito. Contrarily Sherman wraped up the Cards top RB several times with textbook tackles twice for losses. The LOB slapped around Fitzgerald and the Cards RBs like a little red headed stepchilds. Cardinals ran for 29 yards. The refs gave AZ more yards on phoney interference calls than they earned with completions. They called 11 penalties on the Hawks to only 2 on AZ. AZ gained less than 200 yards and was awarded around 100 against Seattle plus over 100 on the PI calls.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Seattle offense didn't play the third string QB of the Cards. They played one of the best defenses in the NFL. Peterson believes he is the best corner in the NFL. He had his hands on Lynch right on the sideline halfway on the 80 plus TD run and Lynch flicked him off like a mosquito. Contrarily Sherman wraped up the Cards top RB several times with textbook tackles twice for losses. The LOB slapped around Fitzgerald and the Cards RBs like a little red headed stepchilds. Cardinals ran for 29 yards. The refs gave AZ more yards on phoney interference calls than they earned with completions. They called 11 penalties on the Hawks to only 2 on AZ. AZ gained less than 200 yards and was awarded around 100 against Seattle plus over 100 on the PI calls.

Dude thats because the cards defense was on the field all night long because of so many three and outs.the greatest defense in the world is going to get tired when it has to stay on the field all day long. Look back at my post on my prediction of the game on your cards/seahawks thread.

You'll see that i said it would be close in the first half because of the cards defense.But then in the second halfd because of so many three and outs having a third string quarterback,the defense would be on the field all day long and get tired and thats when the hawks would pull away and blow them out. was it close in the first half? yes.

Look what happend in the FIRST game when they had a reliable quarterback dude as their backup,.much closer game.hardly impressive.

 

[HUGGY]

Some people kicked the Hawks to the curb 10 games ago when they were struggling with the majority of their star players injured and Harvin purposefully becoming a cancer in the locker room because he is just wired that way. He is one of Carroll's few failures. He was expensive cash wise and expensive in failing to become a team player.

Pete Carroll is a wise man seeing his error and without fanfare just correcting the situation. Much of the coaching and GM job is a crap shoot. I give Pete high marks for seeing the problem and acting decisively to fix the situation without disturbing the core strength of the team. It took a few games to right the ship but right the ship is exactly what he did.

 

[Montrovant]

The Seattle offense didn't play the third string QB of the Cards. They played one of the best defenses in the NFL. Peterson believes he is the best corner in the NFL. He had his hands on Lynch right on the sideline halfway on the 80 plus TD run and Lynch flicked him off like a mosquito. Contrarily Sherman wraped up the Cards top RB several times with textbook tackles twice for losses. The LOB slapped around Fitzgerald and the Cards RBs like a little red headed stepchilds. Cardinals ran for 29 yards. The refs gave AZ more yards on phoney interference calls than they earned with completions. They called 11 penalties on the Hawks to only 2 on AZ. AZ gained less than 200 yards and was awarded around 100 against Seattle plus over 100 on the PI calls.

Yeah, Deion Sanders was never a good tackler, in fact he often seemed to intentionally avoid contact, but many have considered him not only the best corner of his time, but possibly the best ever.

It's really a question of what you think makes a corner great. If it's just coverage, maybe Peterson is better than Sherman. If physicality and toughness are part of the equation, Sherman wins.