Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Inspired here: Looks Like We Have A Winner: Democratic Senators Line Up To Support Gorsuch Vote
^^ yes but "leaving them alone" isn't what they've come to associate the dem label with, is it? No. What they associate the dem label with is forced gay marriage in their state when they voted it down and girls being forced to shower in public schools with sexually deranged boys. That's not "being left alone"...which is why 2016 was IN FACT a working class value dem mandate on the USSC.
The American Psychological Association are the de facto judges sitting on these cases where the insane is "judged" sane. Since judges don't have a degree in psychology, they rely on....the head organization of psychology in the US. And there's the trouble, the root of the weed right there...
Rust Belt dems want the type of Justices who won't OK libs drugging little deranged boys and forcing girls to shower with them at public schools. Sorry. That's just an immutable reality that will never change in the common-sense man and woman. Red or blue. If the dems persist on their present course of denying the reality of the IMMENSE DAMAGE the LGBT cult has done to their party label, they will become a footnote in history.
Judicial activism is at the root of all these troubles for the dems...It was like a spark that grew by the LGBT cult's strategic placing/alliance of a few key activist who influenced more liberal peers on the bench until a wildfire was raging out of control. Instead of dispensing actual justice, these lower court and USSC justices were dispensing an ideology. (and, it didn't hurt that the APA these judges rely exclusively on was overtaken by the LGBT cult decades ago: Federal Gay-Activist Judges Aren't to Blame: They Rely on "Science".. ) Dems are associated with that ideology and the worse the courts ruled, the worse was the damage to the dem label. 2016 was the harsh and final manifestation of that damage.
So dems would do well to passively allow a complete scrubbing of judicial activists and replacing them with common sense actually impartial judges. That way they can start to distance themselves from what they never should've embraced in the first place. An overhaul of the American Psychological Association would be my next order of business. Defund them until they embrace science again. Money will talk so their bullshit will walk.
The vast majority of people in the 'rust belt' have rarely even encountered a gay.
Gays in the rust belt are as common as the fucking white unicorns in the garden where Obama used to hide his Camels.
People in the 'rust belt' couldn't care less about these fags as long as they don't prance into their local bar.
You leave us alone we leave you alone.
^^ yes but "leaving them alone" isn't what they've come to associate the dem label with, is it? No. What they associate the dem label with is forced gay marriage in their state when they voted it down and girls being forced to shower in public schools with sexually deranged boys. That's not "being left alone"...which is why 2016 was IN FACT a working class value dem mandate on the USSC.
The American Psychological Association are the de facto judges sitting on these cases where the insane is "judged" sane. Since judges don't have a degree in psychology, they rely on....the head organization of psychology in the US. And there's the trouble, the root of the weed right there...
More importantly, the democrats need to be like suitors to the working-class dems who walked out the door on them, slamming it as they went. A slammed door is not an indicator of an easy woo-back. Dems may still want to cling to their old ways of doing things, but they fucked up and now they have to go get roses and be on bended knee.Blocking him in a tic for tac because Obama's pick was stolen, is not a good tactic. Taking back the Senate is the first step in rescuing the country from the so called President and his band of malicious malcontents.
Rust Belt dems want the type of Justices who won't OK libs drugging little deranged boys and forcing girls to shower with them at public schools. Sorry. That's just an immutable reality that will never change in the common-sense man and woman. Red or blue. If the dems persist on their present course of denying the reality of the IMMENSE DAMAGE the LGBT cult has done to their party label, they will become a footnote in history.
Judicial activism is at the root of all these troubles for the dems...It was like a spark that grew by the LGBT cult's strategic placing/alliance of a few key activist who influenced more liberal peers on the bench until a wildfire was raging out of control. Instead of dispensing actual justice, these lower court and USSC justices were dispensing an ideology. (and, it didn't hurt that the APA these judges rely exclusively on was overtaken by the LGBT cult decades ago: Federal Gay-Activist Judges Aren't to Blame: They Rely on "Science".. ) Dems are associated with that ideology and the worse the courts ruled, the worse was the damage to the dem label. 2016 was the harsh and final manifestation of that damage.
So dems would do well to passively allow a complete scrubbing of judicial activists and replacing them with common sense actually impartial judges. That way they can start to distance themselves from what they never should've embraced in the first place. An overhaul of the American Psychological Association would be my next order of business. Defund them until they embrace science again. Money will talk so their bullshit will walk.
Last edited: