SCOTUS will save America from Trump's attack on democracy

[BlindBoo]

9 - 0 Against Texas.

LOL

 

[eagle7-31]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

Another brain dead left wing loon heard from.

 

[ReinyDays]

The main difference between a democracy and a republic is the extent to which the people control the process of making laws under each form of government.

I see you have the same problem many have in understanding the crucial difference, the reason for the chart I posted, should have helped you, but alas. You fell back on the SECONDARY definitions, which means contradictions exist.

No where have I supported Texas, as I made clear in a thread, that I am just posting the information on the board from the SCOTUS website, not going to be a sidewalk lawyer or judge.

Obviously, you missed the entire point of my original comment ... allowing votes to be thrown out solely because they voted for the wrong person is NOT a democracy, that would be a kleptocracy ... instead, SCOTUS will not hear the Texas case, allow the votes to be tallied, thus preserving democracy ...

not going to be a sidewalk lawyer or judge.

I certainly will be ... so get off the damn sidewalk ... you're in my way ... [giggle] ...

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

Another brain dead left wing loon heard from.

Really??

Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to overturn election - CNNPolitics

 

[progressive hunter]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

I know right,,, its not like they cant go read it for themselves,,,

 

[toobfreak]

Six Conservative Judges with three that were appointed by Trump and yet they disagreed with those suing including Trump...

In other words, all the systeria and claims by the Left that these people were in Trump's pocket once again proved false. And no, they did not "disagree" with Trump, they refused to even hear the case. The details of the suit were never even contested. Try to get it right at least ONCE in a while.

Sorry but reality is Biden won

Joe won nothing. He will be appointed the next president. The nation has been torn in two and now we are left with going from a man with endless energy who was fighting for us who gave us the best economy ever to an old fool with zero energy fighting for foreign interests who will bring us nothing but an imploded economy, body bags, darkness, evictions, foreclosures and welfare checks for millions.

And he won't even serve a full term. The hapless bum will never hold up, and then we'll be left with far worse, a person who got not even ONE VOTE for herself in the primaries.

From an illegitimate president to an unelected socialist.

The only one winning today is every other nation that hates America.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

I know right,,, its not like they cant go read it for themselves,,,

Read what for themselves? You have never once tried to have a civil and rational discussion based on facts in which you presented a conclusion based on a premis that actually supports your position. You do nothing but spew hot air, insults and adhominims. You clearly do not know how to debate or discuss a topic.

 

[progressive hunter]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

I know right,,, its not like they cant go read it for themselves,,,

Read what for themselves? You have never once tried to have a civil and rational discussion based on facts in which you presented a conclusion based on a premis that actually supports your position. You do nothing but spew hot air, insults and adhominims. You clearly do not know how to debate or discuss a topic.

thanks for your ignorant opinion,,,

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Six Conservative Judges with three that were appointed by Trump and yet they disagreed with those suing including Trump...

In other words, all the systeria and claims by the Left that these people were in Trump's pocket once again proved false. And no, they did not "disagree" with Trump, they refused to even hear the case. The details of the suit were never even contested. Try to get it right at least ONCE in a while.

Sorry but reality is Biden won

Joe won nothing. He will be appointed the next president. The nation has been torn in two and now we are left with going from a man with endless energy who was fighting for us who gave us the best economy ever to an old fool with zero energy fighting for foreign interests who will bring us nothing but an imploded economy, body bags, darkness, evictions, foreclosures and welfare checks for millions.

And he won't even serve a full term. The hapless bum will never hold up, and then we'll be left with far worse, a person who got not even ONE VOTE for herself in the primaries.

From an illegitimate president to an unelected socialist.

The only one winning today is every other nation that hates America.

Hate to tell you but the USSC refused to hear the case because it was as bogus as your response...

Biden won the election and each State did the recounts and not once did it change the reality Trump lost...

So now you will be proclaiming those like Kemp were in on the supposed cheating so they could put Biden in and how ridiculous does that sound?

 

[pyetro]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

Good friggin' Lord...how many more of these hate-driven, mis-information, propaganda posts do we have to endure from the 'scream-at-the-sky' snowflake crowd?!

One after the other, all claiming the same thing, that President Trump is 'ATTACKING OUR DEMOCRACY' ... despite the FACT that the same legal, Constitutional process established to legally challenge the results of elections used by Al Gore unsuccessfully in 2000 is the SAME EXACT ONE being used by President Trump!

Snowflakes, do us all a favor, STFU!

Stop trying to REWRITE History!

STOP spreading mis-information and propaganda!

Just run out to the streets and scream at the damn sky again until the legal challenges are over and the election is certified.



And BTW, the suit put forward by the State of Texas and 18 other States in challenging the election fraud and Un-Constitutional acts perpetrated in the middle of the election by PA is PERFECTLY LEGALAND CONSTITUTIONAL, too.

It's not a form of 'PUNISHMENT' against butt-hurt, TDS-suffering, hate-driven snowflakes whp have supported and cheered on the unethical, immoral, criminal, and Un-Constitutional efforts by the Democrats who have tried to oust the most successful President in DECADES, in some cases EVER, due to their desperate desire to seize power and due to their irrational hatred.

Lol. Dumbass. Your post didn't age well.

 

[toobfreak]

Take it to the bank

Take what to the bank, that a democrat writing with interest in seeing another democrat in the WH writes against the action to fix the election? Were we supposed to be suprised?

The author puts his own foot in his mouth:

"Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies. No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it. The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump"

And there you have it in black and white. By their own admission, how can you say a case was bogus and full of lies or an attack upon democracy trying to destroy it and an attempted coup when YOU REFUSED TO EVEN READ THE CASE AND WEIGH THE MERITS OF THE EVIDENCE?

You can't. What we have here is a corrupt government moving to protect itself from being exposed and sweeping the facts under the table. If Trump's case was baseless without merit, then the evidence should have been heard and PROVEN WRONG in court, but they knew they couldn't do that.

Welcome to the new Banana Republic of North America, soon to have its new installed puppet, el presidente Kamela Harris a la Biden.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

In other words, all the systeria and claims by the Left that these people were in Trump's pocket once again proved false. And no, they did not "disagree" with Trump, they refused to even hear the case. The details of the suit were never even contested. Try to get it right at least ONCE in a while.

Yes there was fear thet his appointees would do his bidding. Thankfully we were wrong and it appears that our stem of checks and ballances is strong and working. The Justices did in fact disagree with Texas and Trump because there was no case to hear. Soverin states make and enforce their own election laws. I thought that you rightwingers were big supporters of the 10th Amendment. Well, here you have it. You can't have it both ways . Texas lacked standing. SCOTUS lacked jurisdiction .End of story. Deal with it.

 

[toobfreak]

Hate to tell you but the USSC refused to hear the case because it was as bogus

If I tell you I have a $50 bill in my pocket and you tell me I'm a liar but refuse to look in my pocket or let me take it out and show you, then who's kidding who?

YOU CAN'T SAY A CASE IS "BOGUS" (without merit) when you refuse to even let the evidence out into the light of day and test it to see if it holds up or whether you can prove it wrong.

You're not mad, just stupid.

All these states didn't go to the Supreme Court for nothing.

 

[BULLDOG]

In other words, all the systeria and claims by the Left that these people were in Trump's pocket once again proved false. And no, they did not "disagree" with Trump, they refused to even hear the case. The details of the suit were never even contested. Try to get it right at least ONCE in a while.

Yes there was fear they his appointees would do his bidding. Thankfully we were wrong and it appears that our stem of checks and ballances is strong and working. The Justices did in fact disagree with Texas and Trump because there was no case to hear. Spverin states make and enforce their own election laws. I thought that you rightwingers were big supporters of the 10th Amendment. Well, here you have it. You can't have it both ways . Texas lacked standing. SCOTUS lacked jurisdiction .End of story. Deal with it.

Don't relax about our newly named SC justices. Just because they didn't cave to Trump this time doesn't mean they don't still believe all the crap they were chosen for in the first place. All three still oppose a woman's right to make decision about her own body, and are perfectly happy with crazy gun nuts owning congress

 

[BULLDOG]

Hate to tell you but the USSC refused to hear the case because it was as bogus

If I tell you I have a $50 bill in my pocket and you tell me I'm a liar but refuse to look in my pocket or let me take it out and show you, then who's kidding who?

YOU CAN'T SAY A CASE IS "BOGUS" (without merit) when you refuse to even let the evidence out into the light of day and test it to see if it holds up or whether you can prove it wrong.

You're not mad, just stupid.

All these states didn't go to the Supreme Court for nothing.

If you say you have a hippopotamus in your pocket, it's perfectly reasonable to tell you to fuck off. What Texas did was the same as claiming they had a hippopotamus.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Joe won nothing. He will be appointed the next president. The nation has been torn in two and now we are left with going from a man with endless energy who was fighting for us who gave us the best economy ever to an old fool with zero energy fighting for foreign interests who will bring us nothing but an imploded economy, body bags, darkness, evictions, foreclosures and welfare checks for millions.

And he won't even serve a full term. The hapless bum will never hold up, and then we'll be left with far worse, a person who got not even ONE VOTE for herself in the primaries.

From an illegitimate president to an unelected socialist.

President Elect Biden won the presidency of the United States of America. Deal with it. Yes the nation has been torn, first by 4 years of a rufian bafoon who knows no civility or empathy and acts like he is king of America with no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. Nothing but arrogance and hubris. He respects no one and cares about no one but himself. . And then making a mockery of an election and the democratic process by acting like a spoiled and captious 5 year old who was denied a second desert.

The America first president has hardly put America first, before the election, and most notable after the election. Since his defeat he has vertually abandoned his presidential duties while obsessing about a immagined stolen election.

As far as the economy goes, we were doing well before the pandemic, not because of Trump but despite him. Despite his trad wars, his tax givaways to the rich and blowing up the debbt. And Biden will not be " fighting for foreign interests" He will be fighting to restore America as a world leader and a trusted ally to our friends and as a country will will stanjd up to te despots that Trump embraced.

"imploded economy, body bags, darkness, evictions, foreclosures and welfare checks for millions. " ? Get a fucking grip. Such histeronics!! He will serve at least one term and Harris will be the next president. Deal with it. It is time.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

In other words, all the systeria and claims by the Left that these people were in Trump's pocket once again proved false. And no, they did not "disagree" with Trump, they refused to even hear the case. The details of the suit were never even contested. Try to get it right at least ONCE in a while.

Yes there was fear they his appointees would do his bidding. Thankfully we were wrong and it appears that our stem of checks and ballances is strong and working. The Justices did in fact disagree with Texas and Trump because there was no case to hear. Spverin states make and enforce their own election laws. I thought that you rightwingers were big supporters of the 10th Amendment. Well, here you have it. You can't have it both ways . Texas lacked standing. SCOTUS lacked jurisdiction .End of story. Deal with it.

Don't relax about our newly named SC justices. Just because they didn't cave to Trump this time doesn't mean they don't still believe all the crap they were chosen for in the first place. All three still oppose a woman's right to make decision about her own body, and are perfectly happy with crazy gun nuts owning congress

Yup, You're right . Not that relaxed. Just releaved for now

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

I know right,,, its not like they cant go read it for themselves,,,

Read what for themselves? You have never once tried to have a civil and rational discussion based on facts in which you presented a conclusion based on a premis that actually supports your position. You do nothing but spew hot air, insults and adhominims. You clearly do not know how to debate or discuss a topic.

thanks for your ignorant opinion,,,

Thank you for confirming the accuracy of my assessment of your shallow and anti intelectual approach to the topic that is devoid of any anylitical quality

 

[konradv]

Take it to the bank

Many of the decisions against Trump were written with a judicial version of sarcasm and ridicule, by judges who seem offended by bogus allegations based on a pandemic of lies.​

​

I would add a warning to Trump, his attorneys and his supporters in Congress: many of Trump’s words and deeds in this case and other matters have resulted in so much anger, so much hatred, so much rage based on so many lies that it is very possible some dastardly deed may be committed against one of many public officials including elected officials, election administrators and medical authorities battling the COVID-19 plague.​

​

If any of these individuals receiving threats of violence are physically attacked, the president would be widely seen as inciting violence, making him morally guilty in many eyes, and potentially legally liable.​

​

No president, from any party, from the founding of our nation until today, has ever tried to attack and destroy American democracy the way Trump has. No president, no Democrat, no Republican, no liberal, no conservative, no moderate, no leader in the history of our Republic has ever done what Trump has done, and continues to do today. ​

​

Recently the United States Supreme Court refused to hear a case against the Pennsylvania vote in the 2020 presidential campaign. Soon the United States Supreme Court will reject the Texas case, most likely by refusing to consider it, or by issuing a ruling rejecting it, almost certainly by a unanimous vote of justices.​

​

The Supreme Court will end the attempted legal coup d’etat by Donald Trump, once and for all, consigning it to the dust binds of American history to be scorned by historians of democracy for a thousand years.​

SCOTUS will save America from Trump’s attacks on democracy

What Trump is attempting today is, in fact, an effective coup d’etat against the democracy of the United States.

thehill.com

we're not a democracy dumbass,,,

Instead of call people names like a special ed. school yard bully that you most likely are, you might want to try to engage in adult level discourse and explain that we are a republic, and what that means, but that we can also be described as a representitive -vs a direct democracy.

I've tried that many times and it didnt work,,,

Bovine excrement!

I know right,,, its not like they cant go read it for themselves,,,

Read what for themselves? You have never once tried to have a civil and rational discussion based on facts in which you presented a conclusion based on a premis that actually supports your position. You do nothing but spew hot air, insults and adhominims. You clearly do not know how to debate or discuss a topic.

thanks for your ignorant opinion,,,

Think you just made his point.