Texas Reply To Four States Alleges A Months-Long Plot To injure Texas That Only Took Them Weeks To Uncover(?)! (Leaving Courts Behind!)

[mascale]

Texas replied to the Four Defendant States hours ago. One matter glaring is that the filing originates from outside of normal capabilities and possibilities. The reason that Texas took so long to file is that, (1) a plot took months to put into action, and (2) that Texas only had weeks to detect the wrong-doing.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163492/20201211095715842_TX-v-State-MPI-Reply-2020-12-11.pdf

So as a part of the plot, It is clear that the Electors Clause of the Constitution applies to the President's election, but that the Elections Clause has nothing to do with the vote for the Electors(?). Reasoning: "Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.” Allegation--The choosing of the electors is not bound by the vote for any one or all of them(?)"

So on that basis, all the decisions already affirmed in the state courts or jurisdiction--that nothing wrong happened in the elections--is basis for the Defendant states to have no clue about the outcome of the elections in their states(?)! There was nothing lawful about the outcomes, even though there was no wrong-doing found(?)! Most people count stuff!

Nothing possible is found in the Texas reply. Most people count stuff!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-20: Creates the basis for gouging and screwing the subjugated: And so was put into practice by the Moslem and Christian Princes, via the Jews(?)! They could not do what Jews could do, because they weren't allowed to charge the interest, like the Jews were allowed to do(?)!)

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Uncovering democrat shenanigans isn't hard. Having them held accountable is

 

[mascale]

Illiterate as always poster, Grampa Murked U, fails as always--now at noticing what Texas did. The Defendant vote counts have been litigated, finding no wrong-doing. Texas claims that leaves no basis for counting.

That would be a violation of the laws in each of the states.

Texas has no evidence, and therefore no basis of, or in fact a complaint!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-20: Creates the basis for gouging and screwing the subjugated: And so was put into practice by the Moslem and Christian Princes, via the Jews(?)! They could not do what Jews could do, because they weren't allowed to charge the interest, like the Jews were allowed to do(?)!)

 

[MarathonMike]

Even your thread titles are jumbled confusion. Do you have a job? How do you communicate with people?

 

[mascale]

Anyone notices that Illiterate poster, Marathon Mike, appears unable to believe that Texas even filed the reply to Defendants.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Deut 23: 19-20: Creates the basis for gouging and screwing the subjugated: And so was put into practice by the Moslem and Christian Princes, via the Jews(?)! They could not do what Jews could do, because they weren't allowed to charge the interest, like the Jews were allowed to do(?)!