No Mamooth really doesn't understand that the COURT is not the Constitutional body to CHANGE election PROCEDURES just less than 60 days before an election.. The LEGISLATURE IS... And they REFUSED the governor's request..
You peculiar version of how the law works is still totally wrong, no matter how upset you get about it. When laws are in conflict, the courts rule what the law is.
Ask him what in the Constitution there gives the COURTS the right to change an END DATE on an election?
The Free and Equal elections clause of the Pennsylvania State Constitution.
You can ask me those things yourself, you know.
They refused to consider the SECURITY of the election by allowing votes to COME IN after the election date set by the Legislature..
Your conclusion seems to be in no way related to your premise. Why would validly postmarked ballots coming in after the election date be less secure than those coming in before?
Especially since in the process , there is NO TRACKING of when those votes were postmarked, mailed or recieved and no WAY to review that once the envelopes are gone..
There's no tracking of postmarks before, either, so your claim makes no sense.
It's also irrational, being that Biden's win margin in Pennsylvania is at 45k and growing, and that there were about 5k later ballots, which were all segregated, and still remain so. So even if you throw out every late-but-validly-postmarked ballot, it changes nothing.
Last edited: