Schiff accuses Bondi of being political. Says she covered up Homan getting $50k in a bag. Bondi goes in dry on Schiff

[he just circle K]

Bondi goes in dry on Schiff?
Hmmm..........................................................................

 

[Godboy]

We would need to know the details if true. Was he entrapped? Caught in a false flag or influence campaign? Were there circumstances behind it we wouldn't know?

Transparency is important though. Trump would not be happy that's for certain. Homan does seem to be sidelined at the moment so there is almost certainly some smoke there.

The FBI says they found no wrong doing with the transaction. What if Hommen sold the boat that he keeps in his backyard for $50,000 because, he just doesnt use it enough anymore? His personal business is not going to be revealed by the government. Would you want your government to be "transparent" to the entire nation (and the whole world for that matter) about YOUR financial transactions, or do you prefer privacy?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

In this thread: magaturds be mad.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Blondi is a part if the original epstein plea deal. She is in it up to her neck. Trump wouldnt have hired her is she wasnt dirty.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

"$50,000 in a bag."
Is there any LIE this bug-eyed ASSHOLE won't tell?

He kno democrats will swear to the lie.

 

[PeanutGallery]

Even IF the video gets released, they will deny it ever happened or is AI.

See below.


↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓





As of October 2025, there is no publicly released video showing Tom Homan accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents
. However, several news outlets, congressional Democrats, and a nonprofit organization have stated that the incident was recorded.
Key facts about the alleged recording:

• Recording confirmed by sources: Internal FBI summaries and anonymous sources confirm that Homan accepted the money during a meeting in Texas in September 2024, and the exchange was captured by "hidden cameras". The New York Timesinitially reported it was captured on audiotape, though other sources indicate it was video.
• Investigation and closure: The investigation was initiated by the FBI during the Biden administration. After the Trump administration took office, the Justice Department shut down the investigation.
• Release demanded: Democrats on the House and Senate Judiciary Committees have demanded that the Department of Justice release the recordings.
• Lawsuit filed: The nonprofit group Democracy Forward filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice and FBI in October 2025 to compel the release of the recording.
• Denial and dismissal: The White House and Justice Department have denied the allegations and dismissed the investigation as politically motivated. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has stated that Homan never took the $50,000.
• Heated exchange: During an October 2025 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Attorney General Pam Bondi repeatedly refused to answer questions from Democrats about the existence and release of the recording.

Then they should release the video. How do all these news outlets, a nonprofit organization(?), and congressional Democrats know that it exists, but nobody bothered to ask or make a copy? It's pretty convenient if you want to try and make a conspiracy theory. We know it exists, but Patel won't release the video to protect Homan. The problem is that probably all these entities and people have a credibility issue. How many of them told us that Biden was fit to do a 2nd term? So, please explain what makes them credible?

 

[TimFitz]

The FBI says they found no wrong doing with the transaction. What if Hommen sold the boat that he keeps in his backyard for $50,000 because, he just doesnt use it enough anymore? His personal business is not going to be revealed by the government. Would you want your government to be "transparent" to the entire nation (and the whole world for that matter) about YOUR financial transactions, or do you prefer privacy?

Your made up “what ifs” mean nothing, and constitute a pathetic attempt to deny the obvious.

ICE is ready made for graft. An unlimited federal cash commitment, lowered hiring standards, no bid contracts to an industry with a very shady past.

The opportunities are endless. And in this most corrupt Adminisration in US history, only the most stalwart cultists would pretend otherwise.

 

[TimFitz]

Then they should release the video. How do all these news outlets, a nonprofit organization(?), and congressional Democrats know that it exists, but nobody bothered to ask or make a copy? It's pretty convenient if you want to try and make a conspiracy theory. We know it exists, but Patel won't release the video to protect Homan. The problem is that probably all these entities and people have a credibility issue. How many of them told us that Biden was fit to do a 2nd term? So, please explain what makes them credible?

What is the empty BS about “making a copy”?

Bondi didn’t deny either the bribe or that it was caught on tape by an FBI sting.

He tried to dodge responsibility for dropping the matter.

When that didn’t work, she threw it on her subordinates, who executed the cover up.

 

[struth]

Where's the money, our $50,000? Simple question should have a simple answer...

1, 2, 3, easy as can be.

Did we get it back or does Homan still have it and pocketed it for himself?

Take it up with the Xiden admin, they were the one that apparently spent it. Maybe that's why so many of them, needed pardons.

 

[struth]

What is the empty BS about “making a copy”?

Bondi didn’t deny either the bribe or that it was caught on tape by an FBI sting.

He tried to dodge responsibility for dropping the matter.

When that didn’t work, she threw it on her subordinates, who executed the cover up.

why does she have to deny a bribe? What bribe? She wasn't in office when this alledgedly happened. That was the Xiden admin.

 

[Frankenstein]

Schiff is an empty suit.

He didn't even actually win in California!

 

[struth]

Give us an example where Garland was covering up for a crooked person in the Biden Administration taking a bribe, where he would have been questioned on, to compare.

Did he prosecute Joey Xiden? The man took millions, his family took millions, they needed pardons

 

[PeanutGallery]

What is the empty BS about “making a copy”?

Bondi didn’t deny either the bribe or that it was caught on tape by an FBI sting.

He tried to dodge responsibility for dropping the matter.

When that didn’t work, she threw it on her subordinates, who executed the cover up.

The bribe for what? What could Homan offer for $50,000 when he possessed no seat of political authority? Gotta dig deep to try and explain that one. It's not BS, because we've already have had news organizations and democrat politicians tell us about a supposed video showing damaging information in relation to Trump. Remember the "pee tape" Fitz? We're STILL waiting for confirmation that video exists almost a decade later.

 

[Godboy]

Your made up “what ifs” mean nothing, and constitute a pathetic attempt to deny the obvious.

This entire thing is "made up of what-ifs". This stems soley from an unsubstatiated claim on Reddit. You have NO IDEA what he got paid for, but you assume its illegal, despite the FBI clearing him of any wrong doing.

 

[g5000]

.

Bondi is a DEI hire.

She's in the Cabinet so there is at least one person Trump looks smarter than.

.

 

[struth]

.

Bondi is a DEI hire.

She's in the Cabinet so there is at least one person Trump looks smarter than.

.

The cabinet is full of very smart people

 

[g5000]

The bribe for what? What could Homan offer for $50,000 when he possessed no seat of political authority? Gotta dig deep to try and explain that one.

Homan wasn't even the target of the investigation. He set himself up.

Homan was expected to grant favors in a potential second Trump administration.

There. That's wasn't hard to explain at all.

 

[g5000]

The cabinet is full of very smart people

Smart in the ways of grifting, that's all.

.

 

[struth]

Homan wasn't even the target of the investigation. He set himself up.

Homan was expected to grant favors in a potential second Trump administration.

There. That's wasn't hard to explain at all.

Correct the target was Trump and his campaign

 

[struth]

Smart in the ways of grifting, that's all.

.

Grifting is small scale crimes, the way the Trump cabinet is breaking demafacist hearts is huge, and epic