Sarah Palins's Call To 'Take Back The 20' Districts Was A Success (Her Scorecard 19)

[AllieBaba]

Sarah wanted to take back 20 districts--districts WON by Sarah Palin and her running mate from Arizona, but that had DEMOCRAT REPRESENTATIVES in the House who voted for Hussein's DeathCare plan. People listened to her because they saw the strong patriotism and convictions she has toward this country. They saw that she was right and that the only way to get this country back on track was to vote the democrats out. This is their response to her calling to 'Take Back The 20' with her endorsements.

Take Back the 20

How did Sarah do?

1. Florida 24: Sarah's Candidate Sandy Adams won.

2. Florida 2: Sarah's Candidate Steve Southerland won.

3. South Carolina 5: Sarah's Candidate Mick Mulvaney won.

4. Virginia 5: Sarah's Candidate Robert Hurt won.

5. West Virginia 1: Sarah's Candidate David McKinley won.

6. West Virginia 3: Sarah's Candidate Spike Maynard lost.

7. Pennsylvania 3: Sarah's Candidate Mike Kelly won.

8. Pennsylvania 10: Sarah's Candidate Tom Marino won.

9. Ohio 6: Sarah's Candidate Bill Johnson won.

10.Ohio 16: Sarah's Candidate Jim Renacci won.

11. Indiana 8: Sarah's Candidate Larry Buchson won.

12. Indiana 9: Sarah's Candidate Todd Young won.

13. Tennessee 6: Sarah's Candidate Diane Black won.

14. Arkansas 2: Sarah's Candidate Tim Griffin won.

15. North Dakota (at large): Sarah's Candidate Rick Berg won.

16. Colorado 3: Sarah's Candidate Scott Tipton won.

17. Colorado 4: Sarah's Candidate Cory Gardner won.

18. Arizona 1: Sarah's Candidate Paul Gosar won.

19. Arizona 5: Sarah's Candidate David Schweikert won.

20. Arizona 8: Sarah's Candidate Jesse Kelly NO CALL YET MADE! Looks like he will win though


At worst, Sarah Pac is 19 won, lost 1.

95% success rate. Excellent. This shows the power and influence she has.

Sarah hardly has a strategic mind. She sees a parade and jumps out in front of it, then takes all the credit.

Pfft....yeah, that's it, lol.

 

[AllieBaba]

Folks the Democrats took significant losses last night. The Republicans made significant gains in both the House and Senate.

I give Sarah Palin at least some of the credit for that.

I think you guys on the left simply don't have it in you to understand WHY the Democrats took significant losses last night. You have to have a devil to accuse and you're starting to look really silly accusing George Bush. So Palin is the new whipping boy? She will be blamed now for everything from hangnails to thermonuclear war? Or is she simply the diversion so that you don't have to discuss why the vote went as it did yesterday?

And we're off and running. It isn't a very pleasant place to be when you're on the opposite end of the playing field--trying to defend your candidate(s) even after they've won. Of course Palin will be criticized, blamed, laughed at, even more than she ever was. It's par for the course, as they say. It won't be long before Republicans who want to win in 2012 jump in and start criticizing her as being more destructive than helpful.

What totally bewilders me are people like you--smart, educated, articulate--who think Sarah Palin is some kind of genius who's going to save America, when, in fact, she is anything BUT smart, educated, and articulate. And please don't try to tell us that she represents the mainstream who want "real people" in office, because if that were the case, then Angel and O'Donnell would have won. While "mainstream" Americans might like the message, when it comes down to the ballot box, they're smart enough to know that's all it is: Talk, with no real plan of action.

Lol again. Yeah, she's a BIG DUMMY!

You guys are pathetic.

 

[del]

Sarah wanted to take back 20 districts--districts WON by Sarah Palin and her running mate from Arizona, but that had DEMOCRAT REPRESENTATIVES in the House who voted for Hussein's DeathCare plan. People listened to her because they saw the strong patriotism and convictions she has toward this country. They saw that she was right and that the only way to get this country back on track was to vote the democrats out. This is their response to her calling to 'Take Back The 20' with her endorsements.

Take Back the 20

How did Sarah do?

1. Florida 24: Sarah's Candidate Sandy Adams won.

2. Florida 2: Sarah's Candidate Steve Southerland won.

3. South Carolina 5: Sarah's Candidate Mick Mulvaney won.

4. Virginia 5: Sarah's Candidate Robert Hurt won.

5. West Virginia 1: Sarah's Candidate David McKinley won.

6. West Virginia 3: Sarah's Candidate Spike Maynard lost.

7. Pennsylvania 3: Sarah's Candidate Mike Kelly won.

8. Pennsylvania 10: Sarah's Candidate Tom Marino won.

9. Ohio 6: Sarah's Candidate Bill Johnson won.

10.Ohio 16: Sarah's Candidate Jim Renacci won.

11. Indiana 8: Sarah's Candidate Larry Buchson won.

12. Indiana 9: Sarah's Candidate Todd Young won.

13. Tennessee 6: Sarah's Candidate Diane Black won.

14. Arkansas 2: Sarah's Candidate Tim Griffin won.

15. North Dakota (at large): Sarah's Candidate Rick Berg won.

16. Colorado 3: Sarah's Candidate Scott Tipton won.

17. Colorado 4: Sarah's Candidate Cory Gardner won.

18. Arizona 1: Sarah's Candidate Paul Gosar won.

19. Arizona 5: Sarah's Candidate David Schweikert won.

20. Arizona 8: Sarah's Candidate Jesse Kelly NO CALL YET MADE! Looks like he will win though


At worst, Sarah Pac is 19 won, lost 1.

95% success rate. Excellent. This shows the power and influence she has.

Sarah hardly has a strategic mind. She sees a parade and jumps out in front of it, then takes all the credit.

Pfft....yeah, that's it, lol.

sarah makes you look good.

 

[AllieBaba]

I look good anyway.

You should look at your posts with an objective eye.

 

[Foxfyre]

I look good anyway.

You should look at your posts with an objective eye.

They're not going to be objective about Palin. I don't know whether she will be presidential material, but I do know she is smart, a fast learner, and an effective speaker, and I do know that her endorsement certainly has not hurt the candidates who enjoyed success yesterday.

It still is amusing, if it wasn't so frustrating due to the hatefulness and unfairness of it, that she is such a threatening figure to those on the Left. They won't give her any credit for anything positive. They are still demonizing and trying to marginalize her with as many ugly observations and comments as possible. It is a fascinating thing to watch. Palin must have something going for her to generate this much attention and pure unsupportable hatred.

 

[MaggieMae]

I look good anyway.

You should look at your posts with an objective eye.

They're not going to be objective about Palin. I don't know whether she will be presidential material, but I do know she is smart, a fast learner, and an effective speaker, and I do know that her endorsement certainly has not hurt the candidates who enjoyed success yesterday.

It still is amusing, if it wasn't so frustrating due to the hatefulness and unfairness of it, that she is such a threatening figure to those on the Left. They won't give her any credit for anything positive. They are still demonizing and trying to marginalize her with as many ugly observations and comments as possible. It is a fascinating thing to watch. Palin must have something going for her to generate this much attention and pure unsupportable hatred.

Really, FF, what has she EVER said in any one of her thousands of speeches that has even the hint of how she expects all she talks about will be accomplished? She's "smart"??? Puleeze...Anyone can do a speech, especially if its the same one over and over again. Palin never even bothers to change the sequence of hers!

 

[Sarah G]

sarah palin is, IMO, a very lucky woman who is maximizing the opportunities that have flowed from mccain's attempt to pander to voters by nominating her as vp. while she has done a great job sucking up money and leading the left side of the bell curve wing of the republican party, she is no more qualified to be president than obama is. go ahead and nominate her. see what happens.

I don't believe I mentioned the Presidency did I? Having a bit of a meltdown there my friend?

not even close little buddy.

keep swinging

I can see why they like her, she's personable and in real life, I'd have her as a friend but to say she's qualified to be president is psychotic. It's as if they don't even care what happens to the country as long as the suit fits.

 

[Foxfyre]

I don't believe I mentioned the Presidency did I? Having a bit of a meltdown there my friend?

not even close little buddy.

keep swinging

I can see why they like her, she's personable and in real life, I'd have her as a friend but to say she's qualified to be president is psychotic. It's as if they don't even care what happens to the country as long as the suit fits.

Where in the OP or in this discussion is there anything about qualifications to be President except that brought up by you on the Left? We aren't discussing the presidency. We're discussing her effectiveness re the campaign just concluded. The evidence suggests she was quite effective.

Can we focus on that?

 

[jillian]

I look good anyway.

You should look at your posts with an objective eye.

They're not going to be objective about Palin. I don't know whether she will be presidential material, but I do know she is smart, a fast learner, and an effective speaker, and I do know that her endorsement certainly has not hurt the candidates who enjoyed success yesterday.

really? i don't see any indication she's either smart or a learner at all. nor is she effective as a speaker. i'd guess for any but those who already agree with her, she sounds pretty vapid.

as for her endorsement not hurting? you might want to ask bill miller how that worked out for him in the general election.

After Tuesday's midterm vote, Sen. Lisa Murkowski appears to be heading to victory in her write-in bid to best tea party challenger Joe Miller and Democrat Scott McAdams. As the Anchorage Daily News reports, with 432 of 438 precincts reporting, 41 percent of the votes cast so far have been write-ins. By contrast, Miller has tallied 34 percent of the ballots counted thus far, and McAdams has raked in 24 percent. But it could take weeks to tabulate the write-ins.

Alaska Election Results: Lisa Murkowski Seems to Have Lead Over Joe Miller

and palin isn't so popular in her own state. that speaks volumes.

 

[jillian]

I can see why they like her, she's personable and in real life, I'd have her as a friend but to say she's qualified to be president is psychotic. It's as if they don't even care what happens to the country as long as the suit fits.

see, she reminds me of the mean girl who broke the arm of the cheerleader who was going up against her in the try-outs. lol..

but truly, they don't care.

 

[Foxfyre]

I look good anyway.

You should look at your posts with an objective eye.

They're not going to be objective about Palin. I don't know whether she will be presidential material, but I do know she is smart, a fast learner, and an effective speaker, and I do know that her endorsement certainly has not hurt the candidates who enjoyed success yesterday.

really? i don't see any indication she's either smart or a learner at all. nor is she effective as a speaker. i'd guess for any but those who already agree with her, she sounds pretty vapid.

as for her endorsement not hurting? you might want to ask bill miller how that worked out for him in the general election.

After Tuesday's midterm vote, Sen. Lisa Murkowski appears to be heading to victory in her write-in bid to best tea party challenger Joe Miller and Democrat Scott McAdams. As the Anchorage Daily News reports, with 432 of 438 precincts reporting, 41 percent of the votes cast so far have been write-ins. By contrast, Miller has tallied 34 percent of the ballots counted thus far, and McAdams has raked in 24 percent. But it could take weeks to tabulate the write-ins.

Alaska Election Results: Lisa Murkowski Seems to Have Lead Over Joe Miller

and palin isn't so popular in her own state. that speaks volumes.

Speaks volumes to you perhaps. Obama's old Senate seat in Illinois, a Democratic seat for like forever, went to a Republican. Both he and Michelle actively campaigned in Illinois to keep that seat. Two others he campaigned for in person also lost. Does that speak volumes about him? Make him a stupido slow learner? Make him disqualified to be President? Hmmmmmm?

If you want to play that game, there is plenty of ammo to go around.

It's unbelievable. The GOP enjoyed a pretty good day yesterday due, in part, to efforts by people like Sarah Palin. So what is the Democrats' response? Is it to see if they can govern better? Maybe seen things differently through the people's eyes? Nooooo. The result is to step up and renew ugly attacks on Sarah Palin. Amazing.

 

[The Infidel]

Folks the Democrats took significant losses last night. The Republicans made significant gains in both the House and Senate.

I give Sarah Palin at least some of the credit for that.

I think you guys on the left simply don't have it in you to understand WHY the Democrats took significant losses last night. You have to have a devil to accuse and you're starting to look really silly accusing George Bush. So Palin is the new whipping boy? She will be blamed now for everything from hangnails to thermonuclear war? Or is she simply the diversion so that you don't have to discuss why the vote went as it did yesterday?

sarah palin is, IMO, a very lucky woman who is maximizing the opportunities that have flowed from mccain's attempt to pander to voters by nominating her as vp. while she has done a great job sucking up money and leading the left side of the bell curve wing of the republican party, she is no more qualified to be president than obama is. go ahead and nominate her. see what happens.

I don't believe I mentioned the Presidency did I? Having a bit of a meltdown there my friend?

 

[jillian]

Speaks volumes to you perhaps. Obama's old Senate seat in Illinois, a Democratic seat for like forever, went to a Republican. Both he and Michelle actively campaigned in Illinois to keep that seat. Two others he campaigned for in person also lost. Does that speak volumes about him? Make him a stupido slow learner? Make him disqualified to be President? Hmmmmmm?

If you want to play that game, there is plenty of ammo to go around.

It's unbelievable. The GOP enjoyed a pretty good day yesterday due, in part, to efforts by people like Sarah Palin. So what is the Democrats' response? Is it to see if they can govern better? Maybe seen things differently through the people's eyes? Nooooo. The result is to step up and renew ugly attacks on Sarah Palin. Amazing.

you're deflecting hon. try to stay on topic. is this a 'game' to you? seriously. i dunno.. to me, it's about the future i want my son to have. i take that kind of seriously. and friviolous loons like ignorant palin who talk about the 'pro america parts of the country' are undeserving of serious consideration.

and what 'people' hon? the ones who agree with you?

 

[Revere]

Poverty and debt is the future you want your son to have?

 

[Foxfyre]

Speaks volumes to you perhaps. Obama's old Senate seat in Illinois, a Democratic seat for like forever, went to a Republican. Both he and Michelle actively campaigned in Illinois to keep that seat. Two others he campaigned for in person also lost. Does that speak volumes about him? Make him a stupido slow learner? Make him disqualified to be President? Hmmmmmm?

If you want to play that game, there is plenty of ammo to go around.

It's unbelievable. The GOP enjoyed a pretty good day yesterday due, in part, to efforts by people like Sarah Palin. So what is the Democrats' response? Is it to see if they can govern better? Maybe seen things differently through the people's eyes? Nooooo. The result is to step up and renew ugly attacks on Sarah Palin. Amazing.

you're deflecting hon. try to stay on topic. is this a 'game' to you? seriously. i dunno.. to me, it's about the future i want my son to have. i take that kind of seriously. and friviolous loons like ignorant palin who talk about the 'pro america parts of the country' are undeserving of serious consideration.

and what 'people' hon? the ones who agree with you?

No I'm not deflecting. You guys that are still attacking Sarah and trying to demonize her re the Presidency are the ones who seem to be deflecting. The rest of us haven't even mentioned that but we are affirming that she was effective or at least not detrimental to those candidates she supported.

Please don't think you are exclusive in caring about your kids or grandkids or anybody's kids. Don't think that you are somehow more noble or on point re the future than those of us who disagree with you on how a better future will be accomplished.

And please forgive me if I think attacking Sarah Palin now comes out of far more mean spiritedness, sour grapes, and perhaps desperation than from anything of substance. She has every reason to feel good about the campaign just ended and her contributions to it. She did well. In my opinion, it would be extending a bit of charity to allow her at least a day to enjoy the moment before resuming ripping her to shreds.

And the 'people' are those who went to the polls to vote what I believe was their conscience yesterday too.

 

[Sarah G]

I can see why they like her, she's personable and in real life, I'd have her as a friend but to say she's qualified to be president is psychotic. It's as if they don't even care what happens to the country as long as the suit fits.

see, she reminds me of the mean girl who broke the arm of the cheerleader who was going up against her in the try-outs. lol..

but truly, they don't care.

She's aggressive alright.

 

[NYcarbineer]

As CBS News Correspondent Jeff Glor reports, Palin backed 43 candidates for the House. Thirty of them won, with races involving nine others still undecided. Her record in Senate races was closer.

Let me get this straight. You're crediting Sarah Palin with getting 20 swing districts to swing the other way in a midterm,

when this is what historically swing districts do anyhow?

Who's writing your material?

lol

 

[USArmyRetired]

Folks the Democrats took significant losses last night. The Republicans made significant gains in both the House and Senate.

I give Sarah Palin at least some of the credit for that.

I think you guys on the left simply don't have it in you to understand WHY the Democrats took significant losses last night. You have to have a devil to accuse and you're starting to look really silly accusing George Bush. So Palin is the new whipping boy? She will be blamed now for everything from hangnails to thermonuclear war? Or is she simply the diversion so that you don't have to discuss why the vote went as it did yesterday?

And we're off and running. It isn't a very pleasant place to be when you're on the opposite end of the playing field--trying to defend your candidate(s) even after they've won. Of course Palin will be criticized, blamed, laughed at, even more than she ever was. It's par for the course, as they say. It won't be long before Republicans who want to win in 2012 jump in and start criticizing her as being more destructive than helpful.

What totally bewilders me are people like you--smart, educated, articulate--who think Sarah Palin is some kind of genius who's going to save America, when, in fact, she is anything BUT smart, educated, and articulate. And please don't try to tell us that she represents the mainstream who want "real people" in office, because if that were the case, then Angel and O'Donnell would have won. While "mainstream" Americans might like the message, when it comes down to the ballot box, they're smart enough to know that's all it is: Talk, with no real plan of action.

If you think Sarah Palin is not smart or articulate, then how did she debate and beat a incumbent Governor (Frank Mulkowski) of her own party and a seasoned former democratic governor for the governorship of Alaska when she was just 42yrs old?

 

[JakeStarkey]

What a bunch of silly gooberish posts from people I like! In small districts, the TP had great effect, yet in Colorado, Washington, Nevada, Alaska, and Delaware, more reflective of general elections, the effect failed miserably. Very simply, you are making foolish assumptions. The Dems are there, they are powerful, they have the presidency, and they have the senate. Walk boldly and also observantly.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Pretty good record. She is a Force. Democrats do their best to deny this but it is the truth. I would like to see her heading up the RNC. She would be much more effective than Steele. The Republicans need to hurry up and find a power position for her. She will help.