Sandy Hook: Some Thoughts

[PeterPilot]

Or, far easier, a mentally disturbed young man, with suicidal ideation, and a mother who was stupid and bought a gun for her son trying to be his friend, instead of his parent.

Shooting up the school was easy.

So, a simply looney, out doing evil, or a complex, convoluted plan involving dozens of people, who somehow have been able to keep quiet all these years.

The official story has more holes than 10 pounds of Swiss cheese, but for me the icing on the cake was the NDA demanded of the guys who demolished the school. Memories of the letter from USAF General Partin to Senator Trent Lott telling the Senator that Partin (an expert in explosives in his Air Force career) had examined the Murrah building and found evidence of 3 or 4 locations where explosives had been planted, which nullified the official story about the sole source being the rented trunk outside. Partin urged Lott to not demolish the building until an investigation was conducted. Lott covered his eyes and ears and ordered the demolition.

If the Sandy Hook narrative were true and accurate, then all facts and evidence would support it rather than contradict it. If the official story is so solid, why was the demolition crew ordered to never talk? For those of us with common sense and an understanding of how public officials can be corrupt, the obvious answer is that public officials demanding the NDA had something to hide.

Does that make sense to you?