NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 24,415
- 4,802
- 245
Like what?You have nothing, not a single statement of substance or argument that I haven’t left in smoldering ashes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Like what?You have nothing, not a single statement of substance or argument that I haven’t left in smoldering ashes.
NFBW: You are a liar. I support a woman’s private right to choose to terminate her own pregnancy because there is no constitutional right to life to a potential viable human being that has not developed to the point of being viable. You are on. END2209190855You support aggressive violence against innocent human beings
You are a liar, including in this statement.NFBW: You are a liar.
You support aggressive violence against innocent human beings because you hate them and either want them dead or at least don’t give two shits about their lives or their rights, which is just as bad, and it is why you are pro-abort filth.I support a woman’s private right to choose
Again, your hatemongering is based entirely on the arbitrary factor of having adequate surfactant or not. This is no better or different than hating some random innocents for their skin color or anything else.viable
A 15 week fetal human being is absolutely scientifically, biologically, commonsensically,human beings who you view as subhuman and lacking their own life - you claim they are part of their mother’s life, at complete odds with scientific reality here on planet Eart
You are either a liar or a biology dunce.Again, your hatemongering is based entirely on the arbitrary factor of having adequate surfactant or not.
In no sense whatsoever, you delusional retard.A 15 week fetal human being is absolutely... a part of its mother.
You are insane to make this claim. The helpless and innocent organism can take no actions whatsoever and has no responsibility for the pregnancy. They can't harm or kill anyone or anything.as it develops that organism can increasingly harm and even kill her
I know that a living human being is alive and a human being.You claim a one celled zygote is a human being. That is at least 20 some trillion human cells short of being viable you effing biological dimwit. END2209190919
You are still attempting to deceive readers after you were given medically updated information. It’s the same as if I were to continue to state that your second child was almost aborted and learning you had a vasectomy and I would continue to state that your second child almost was aborted. I apologized for misunderstanding your words and admitted that I was misinformed. I did not mean to spread a falsehood and instantly stopped after learning. Unlike you, you choose to carry-on with your lying about 24 weeks liability. Google it if you won’t read my sources, it’s no longer 24 weeks non-reader.No one has taken down this point
NFBW: it is universal and indisputable fact that the life that begins at fertilization is not viable until about 24 weeks after fertilization based upon survivability outside the womb.The fundamental basis for Roe v Wade being viability, @Carsonomy and ding do not defeat my arguments by declaring viability irrelevant. That is absurd, And you are not the referee in this discussion .
Monk-Eye had the best response to that. It’s an approximation. it’s certainly never going down to 15 weeks when brain development is far from complete.lying about 24 weeks liability.
A 24 weeks time line is a median approximation
I know what you regard as a one cell living human being cannot become a fully developed human without becoming part of an already viable human being and in that process can harm or kill her. That is my point that you consistently avoid with generic responses such;I know that a living human being is alive and a human being.
You claim not to know this basic scientific fact, and you just might be brain damaged or retarded enough to think that you are correct, but your delusional belief is at odds with scientific reality.
And again you double down on your surfactant fetish. Just go get some artificial surfactant and jerk yourself off with it - spare everyone else, freak
Personally, I tend to avoid using the word “never”. Do you realize the kind of time frame that references? As in, 1,000 years from now would be included, and beyond. We have no idea what type of scientific advancements will be created within 10 years from now, certainly hard to make any claim to knowing beyond that point unless one is a top expert in a given field. Even then…. I read once that even a specialized expert in a certain field will never know more than 1% of all knowledge in that given field if he or she were to study day and night his or her whole life.Monk-Eye had the best response to that. It’s an approximation. it’s certainly never going down to 15 weeks when brain development is far from complete.
What reality and science know to be, you insufferable twit.I know what you regard as a one cell living human being
Wrong, you delusional, deceitful freak.and in that process can harm or kill her.
Objectively false, and stupid.because that human being is a part of the mother
There is no credible scientist who says that an alive zygot at the one cell stage of development has the same right to life as a 30 trillion cell human being. And that is what you is a scientific fact. It is not . You are a stupid hunan being. LINDSAY Graham says majes him believe right to life starts a 15 weeks.What reality and science know to be,
No. If a fetus is not part of the woman who carries it how can it kill her. You cannot answer that so you don’t.Objectively false, and stupid.
Does the phrase “to save the life of the mother” mean anything to you, idiot.Wrong, you delusional, deceitful freak.
*TNG double facepalm*There is no credible scientist who says that an alive zygot at the one cell stage of development has the same right to life as a 30 trillion cell human being.
In those EXCEEDINGLY RARE cases, you sit here and lie that those are the fault and responsibility of a helpless, innocent, sleeping minor? That a being who cannot take any action at all is “hurting” or “killing” someone else?Does the phrase “to save the life of the mother” mean anything to you, idiot.
And I agree with that science. I don’t agree that a pregnant woman is murdering a new individual human being prior to about 24 weeks of pregnancy when that fetus is not developed to a point where it can survive without being a part of her anatomy.And science does inform us that the living Homo sapiens is alive and is an organism of the species Homo sapiens (“human beings”) and that life begins at fertilization and that zygote is the first stage of life after fertilization. There is no credible or plausible alternative to any of those facts. Everything I just said is pure textbook. Introductory and basic fact, unassailable and universal.
How can in any case can a fetus not be a part of a mother’s life if it can kill her.In those EXCEEDINGLY RARE cases, you sit here and lie that those are the fault and responsibility of a helpless, innocent, sleeping minor?
Whaleshit.And I agree with that science.
They are committing homicide, period.I don’t agree that a pregnant woman is murdering a new individual human being
We are never “part of our mother’s anatomy,” drooling retard.where it can survive without being a part of her anatomy.