multivita-man
Platinum Member
- Aug 10, 2022
- 5,291
- 2,676
- 938
Only in your eyes, shitdick. And I don’t care what a scumbag like you thinks of me.
Yeah, keep talkin' Colonel Cumface, lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only in your eyes, shitdick. And I don’t care what a scumbag like you thinks of me.
You still are a shitdick and you suck-off other shitdicks, mutant-boi.
Hurry back with more of the nothing you bring.
You are a complete jerkoff.
View attachment 768684
Lame post. Even by your “standards.”
Well known fact: you are a loser.
Putin’s army crossed an internationally recognized border expecting a much weaker western democracy with an elected government to fall within a week to a fascist white Christian dictator’s madness of an empire lost. But it didn’t go the way of Poland in 1939.If you aren’t able to consider both sides of a sharp divide,
Putin’s army crossed an internationally recognized border expecting a much weaker western democracy with an elected government to fall within a week to a fascist white Christian dictator’s madness of an empire lost. But it didn’t go the way of Poland in 1939.
And you sit on the fence BackAgain whining about what it cost to stop another madman from crossing borders to kill maim and terrorize people living in territories he wants.
^ drama bitch, please.But, you vote for politicians who want to invade and occupy women’s bodies if they get pregnant in ways you don’t like.
Dope: Try to focus. The Constitution doesn’t tell any person what rights they don’t have. It tells government what it may do and what it may not do.BackAgain #2,434 “Yes. It {Constitution} does mention born. But it doesn’t say that the preborn are, on such a flimsy basis, denied the right to life.”
NFBW: It {Constitution} does not say that a woman does not have a right to terminate a pre-born life before it has developed its own brain and capable of survival outside the womb.
END2303240151
The “other view” is allow the mass murderer terrorist have his way if it takes a nuckke it two out of your pocket.No. I was on one side of the debate but have an open mind and took some time to consider the other view.
False. Yours is a dishonest effort to reframe the opposing point of view.The “other view” is allow the mass murderer terrorist have his way if it takes a nickel or two out of our self-absorbed pockets
And if the madman Putin uses some “tactical” nukes to take out Ukrainian military materiel — who really cares if our assistance to Ukraine triggers WWIII?Let’s give UKRAINE whatever those courageous people want to stop this mass murdering genocidal maniac from taking one inch of their hand and get Crimea back.
What?if China and continues to support or look away way from mass murder let’s sanction them to even if it busts us some sacrifices too.
Putin’s got BackAgain runnin’ skeered of his nukes . if Putin gets enough MAGA anti-democracy types who prefer autocratic regimes over free elections to fear his nukes and we cut Ukraine off - not worth it - then Putin has a shot at being the Hitler that wins.who really cares if our assistance to Ukraine triggers WWIII?
Not what I said. So of course, Fool ^ has to lie. What a surprise.Putin’s got BackAgain runnin’ skeered of his nukes .
Off topic, so now you are trying to kill the thread finally ? Of course you are.. ROTFLMBO..Putin’s army crossed an internationally recognized border expecting a much weaker western democracy with an elected government to fall within a week to a fascist white Christian dictator’s madness of an empire lost. But it didn’t go the way of Poland in 1939.
And you sit on the fence BackAgain whining about what it cost to stop another madman from crossing borders to kill maim and terrorize people living in territories he wants.
But, you vote for politicians who want to invade and occupy women’s bodies if they get pregnant in ways you don’t like.
NFBW: Who do you believe beagle9 is most accurately telling the truth in the following exchange? There are two big picture interpretations (let’s call them teams) of the Constitution: Stann is generally on my team. MikeOx is on yours, I proudly write for team Biden. You write for team Trump and the BIG LIE.ROTFLMBO..
You love to conflate as a tactic, but you are fooling no one. Your entire post was an effort in ridiculousness to try and connect dot's that don't connect. Try harder, because you are extremely transparent in your weak strategies and tactics.NFBW: Who do you believe beagle9 is most accurately telling the truth in the following exchange? There are two big picture interpretations (let’s call them teams) of the Constitution: Stann is generally on my team. MikeOx is on yours, I proudly write for team Biden. You write for team Trump and the BIG LIE.
Stann230109-#698 • Stann • You are a fool if you believe only liberal women are having abortions. Independent, Conservative and right-wing women of all types, even so-called religious ones also have abortions. Overall 61% of Americans believe abortion should be legal, of that number 80% are Democrats and Democrat-leaning individuals, 38% are republicans and republican-leaning individuals. I live in Nebraska. It is a red state that still allows abortions. 1,228,308 people are registered as republicans, only 360,449 as Democrats. 68% of all abortions in the state were by republican women. The ratio is less for the republicans but they still have them.
MikeOx230109-#711 to: -13 • Mikeoxenormous • You are the fool to think intelligent women would go out and abort their child. Only stupid moronic braindead liberal women who are whores for Marxist men go out and spread their legs for any Harry or Dick. Then as typical of their lack of brain matter, they wonder how the fuck they got pregnant. Yes they are that stupid, which comes to the point, why your mother didnt succeed in aborting you.
NFBW: Jesus says seek the Truth and you shall be free.
Team Trump in the following Russia exchange way back in 2019 was represented by MikeOx . look what he said back then:
MikeOx190609-#179 • Mikeoxenormous • “NATO was developed to stop the Warsaw Pact, since the fall of the USSR, NATO is kinda obsolete along with the UN. The US should pull out of both, bring the troops home, defend our own borders and stop the invasion of biological warfare brought upon US by the Socialists/FASCISTS/Communists/Marxists/Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.”
SSE190709-#180 to: -1 • SobieskiSavedEurope • @Sobiesk • “No... Russia is just as aggressive now. •••• In Ukraine & Syria & other places. •••• Even Russia is supporting the Taliban”
MikeOx190609-#181 to: -1 • @MikeOx • “So what? It isnt up to the US to be the world police anymore. Everyone hates US and President Trump, right? So now we just leave Europe to deal with the Muslim Facists, and Putin. We just keep our finger on the button, if any of those assholes get an idea of world conquest.”
NFBW: actually, I’d like to see this thread last forever. Documenting input on all matters regarding the constitution and the defense of it from team Trump and from team Biden and anybody in between. Thank you beagle9 for your involvement and revelation of your thoughts about Jesus and religion as a relates to the constitution on topics like abortion and the war in Ukraine and the big election lie.
END2303251051
NFBW: It was a straightforward and fairly simple question. My study is more focused on why members of team Trump do not answer legitimate questions, and you certainly are one great example here of not answering a legitimate question. Why don’t you want to answer this question and keep this thread meaningful and ongoing?You love to conflate as a tactic, but you are fooling no one. Your entire post was an effort in ridiculousness to try and connect dot's that don't connect. Try harder, because you are extremely transparent in your weak strategies and tactics
You ask stupid questions that you hope to get answers for, otherwise that might tickle your leftist ear's, and when no one falls for your bull shite, then you will even try to use that for your leftist agenda projected in this thread.NFBW: It was a straightforward and fairly simple question. My study is more focused on why members of team Trump do not answer legitimate questions, and you certainly are one great example here of not answering a legitimate question. Why don’t you want to answer this question and keep this thread meaningful and ongoing?
Who do you believe beagle9 is most accurately telling the truth or at least closer to the truth in Post 7917 Stann or Mikeoxenormous ????
END23031109