Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Right to privacy eh ? ROTFLMBORFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland “So what's the point of bringing my opinion into it?
NFBW: Your opinion is the legal reason that your secondary “politically biased” opinion is erroneous and not Constitutional because it is driven by religious zealotry ( @Beagle ) instead of Constitutional legal precedence and foundation.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland It is none of my business what a person does because personal decisions are just that--personal.
NFBW: You are absolutely correct. A woman’s personal decision is private and personal when it comes to what to do about an unwanted pregnancy. The court ruled it was a private, basically a personal matter prior to viability of the fetus outside the womb, and that ruling lasted for fifty years.
But here you contradict yourself to put party over the abortion rights of women when you claim it is not a private personal matter because abortion is not addressed in the Constitution.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland However I support the Roe ruling because abortion is not constitutionally protected. It's not in the document, it was never discussed by the authors, it was a bad ruling back in the 70's when it was made.
NFBW: I’m hoping you stand by your primary opinion that what a woman does during pregnancy is her own business and none of your business and not the business of any system of government or organized religion.
You cannot hold both because what you call a bad ruling of the 70s was actually decided based on the right to privacy that every law abiding citizen gets, including pregnant women. Right to privacy is mentioned in the Constitution.
So which is it?
END2211121825 Florence
Right to privacy eh ? ROTFLMBO
I do not believe in supernatural beings. The right to privacy is in the 14th Amendment. There is no personhood right in the Constitution.Go cry your right to privacy to Lucifer, and see how much attention you get.... lol
Woke corporation's have got to be the most pathetic corrupt brainwashed pieces of crap this nation has ever in it's short history has had to deal with.
Hopefully boycotts work, because it's the only way to stop the bull crap before it's to late. Time to support platforms that coincide with our value's and morals in life. We're not perfect no one is, but good grief the walls to hell are getting greasier and greasier if we don't stop the madness of supporting anything gone woke. Toleration out of convenience has gotten this COUNTRY where it is today. Won't be good come judgement day.
Oh so you are going with the perceived notion that this country will honor "right to privacy", otherwise even after the left is destroying the concept in order to push their agenda down the throat's of the Americans after they've destroyed the Americans "right to privacy" as it pertains to anything else ??When the Supreme Court first decided Roe v. Wade, the Court used the right to privacy, as derived from the Fourteenth Amendment, and extended the right to encompass an individual’s right to have an abortion: "This right of privacy . . . founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action . . . is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." right to privacy
A declaration for creation in full form to invoke a premise for altruism and superiority for public policy methods is peculiar .So you are into Darwinism... Got it.... No sense in discussing anything with someone that can't figure out why there are still ape's and other primate's in the wild, but humans were somehow supposed to have evolved or transcended from them in an evolutionary transformative way ... ROTFLMBO
www.usmessageboard.com
RFC221113-#58 Ray From Cleveland All BS. Government handouts, which the Communists rely heavily upon got the younger vote.
Flash220717-#21 Flash “Blacks have this filthy ass entitlement mentality that the stupid White Guilt Libtards have brainwashed them with.
Correll210928-#584 Correll “We Cons win this war, and you've seen what our America looks like. You get to live and have your rights and have a nice society to live in. The Leftards win, the will turn this country into a violent, Turd World shithole, and possibly KILL YOU
NFBW: Are we at war in America between Commies who want a free ride and Capitalists who are fed up with doing all the work and giving it to the commies or is it a bit more complex than that?
END2211130254
When the Supreme Court first decided Roe v. Wade, the Court used the right to privacy, as derived from the Fourteenth Amendment, and extended the right to encompass an individual’s right to have an abortion: "This right of privacy . . . founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action . . . is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." right to privacy
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland “So what's the point of bringing my opinion into it?
NFBW: Your opinion is the legal reason that your secondary “politically biased” opinion is erroneous and not Constitutional because it is driven by religious zealotry ( @Beagle ) instead of Constitutional legal precedence and foundation.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland It is none of my business what a person does because personal decisions are just that--personal.
NFBW: You are absolutely correct. A woman’s personal decision is private and personal when it comes to what to do about an unwanted pregnancy. The court ruled it was a private, basically a personal matter prior to viability of the fetus outside the womb, and that ruling lasted for fifty years.
But here you contradict yourself to put party over the abortion rights of women when you claim it is not a private personal matter because abortion is not addressed in the Constitution.
RFC2212-#5,573 Ray From Cleveland However I support the Roe ruling because abortion is not constitutionally protected. It's not in the document, it was never discussed by the authors, it was a bad ruling back in the 70's when it was made.
NFBW: I’m hoping you stand by your primary opinion that what a woman does during pregnancy is her own business and none of your business and not the business of any system of government or organized religion.
You cannot hold both because what you call a bad ruling of the 70s was actually decided based on the right to privacy that every law abiding citizen gets, including pregnant women. Right to privacy is mentioned in the Constitution.
So which is it?
END2211121825 Florence
A wright to privacy is based on us 9th amendment , however to get to us 9th amendment , one must prohibit state interests in us 10th amendment .I do not believe in supernatural beings. The right to privacy is in the 14th Amendment. There is no personhood right in the Constitution.
www.usmessageboard.com
It is actually egregious to see the supreme court decide the states can ban a medical procedure that can prevent pregnant women from harm. ????RFC221113-#5,592 Ray From Cleveland ”As far as I'm concerned government should not be involved with abortion decisions, but that's contingent on how people of a state decide to vote. It should not be constitutionally protected because what that does is force the people of a state to not have a say-so on the matter. People of a state should be able to write their own laws.”
People of a state are able to write their own laws unless the law infringes upon the natural and inferred rights that individuals are given in the Constitution.
It is actually egregious to see the supreme court decide the states can ban a medical procedure that can prevent pregnant women from harm. No state government is allowed according to the constitution to do harm to an individual unless they are breaking a law.
You are right the government should not be involved in deciding that a woman cannot prevent harm to her body by Forcing her to carry a pregnancy to full-term against her will.
END2211131128
NFBW: Can you guarantee that every woman or girl who gets pregnant and is forced by the government and white Trump worshipping Christians to carry an unwanted pregnancy full term, is at zero risk of harm including risk of death?What exactly does a pregnancy pose as a risk to a woman's health ?
