But it is a human life, distinct from either of its parents.
And thus, the reason this is the relevant question.
It is alive but it has not had a life. It, a single cell, is not a human being anymore than an acorn is an oak tree.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it is a human life, distinct from either of its parents.
And thus, the reason this is the relevant question.
There you go again - "human being".It is alive but it has not had a life. It, a single cell, is not a human being anymore than an acorn is an oak tree.
Issue is the Lefts demand to murder babies up to the time of birth at 9 months.It is alive but it has not had a life. It, a single cell, is not a human being anymore than an acorn is an oak tree.
The former precedent allowed states to regulate abortion after viability. Most states limit those late term abortions.Issue is the Lefts demand to murder babies up to the time of birth at 9 months.
There you go again - "human being".
The relevant term is human life, which it unarguably is.
And thus, the reason this is the relevant question.
You askedSo does that mean you believe that zygotes are babies then?
DC Democrats bill is up to birth. That’s Federal law should it pass.The former precedent allowed states to regulate abortion after viability. Most states limit those late term abortions.
So you don't think that zygotes are babies then?
I had Spotted Owl omelette this morning.So does that mean you believe that zygotes are babies then?
How did they taste?I had Spotted Owl omelette this morning.
So are you playing word salad for some kind of point? Are you saying that the single cell zygote, as human life, deserves the rights we give to babies who are born after suitable gestation?You asked
"....at what point does the fertilized egg become a human being?"
Your question is irrelevant, as the issue does not revolve around the unborns status as a human being.
It -does- revolve around its status as a human life.
You want to insert "human being" into the discussion because you know it means sometthing different than "Human life".So are you playing word salad for some kind of point?
You want to insert "human being" into the discussion because you know it means sometthing different than "Human life".
The status of the unborn as a "human bring" is irrelevant under Roe, et al, , which instead considers "human life" and a states compelling interest in protecting same.
Thus, the relevant question is: when does the unborn become a human life?
You fucking piece of shit, how the hell are you!? It's been a long time! Hope you're doing well.
Detauils to follow
I'm sorry you don't like th terms the court used in Roe, but there's not much I can do about it.Word games are the bread and butter of modern politics.
Hi Bill - how's it going?You fucking piece of shit, how the hell are you!? It's been a long time! Hope you're doing well.
Like chicken. Rare chicken.How did they taste?
Are you saying that the single cell zygote, as human life, deserves the rights we give to babies who are born?You want to insert "human being" into the discussion because you know it means sometthing different than "Human life".
The status of the unborn as a "human being" is irrelevant under Roe, et al, , which instead considers "human life" and a states compelling interest in protecting same.
Thus, the relevant question is: when does the unborn become a human life?
What happens if I knowingly destroy the eggs of an endangered bird?Are you saying that the single cell zygote, as human life, deserves the rights we give to babies who are born?
There's no such animal as an " unborn child ". And TDR is a term more appropriate for you people cuz you're following that insane man.You people are insane. Birth control occurs before conception. So, there is no baby involved at any stage. This is what TDR looks like, insanity.