Rittenhouse prosecution may be in DEEP SHIT

[Richard-H]

The defense didn’t know there was higher quality video until after the evidence portion of the trial was over.

The prosecution was showing the high quality video throughout the trial.

The defense must have been pretty stupid not to see the difference.

The only justification for a mistrial is if the judge finds that the defendants lawyers were incompetent.

 

[Nostra]

He was a freelance reporter under contract to MSNBC.

You should at least read up on a subject before posting.

He was sent to follow the bus by his boss at MSNBC, Dumbass.

I‘m up to speed. You are the one trying to claim he isn’t connected to MSNBC.

 

[john doe 101]

Actually it's worse than that. A young man's life hangs in the balance for taking out the garbage.

Funny how you fuckheads consider a Kyle a hero for killing people but a guy walking down the street that was killed for wearing a hoodie is a "thug". You're morally bankrupt.

 

[AZrailwhale]

The transfer of evidence is done thru the State Crime Lab.

There is no evidence whatsoever that the prosecutor did not give the high quality video to the State Crime lab.

All there is a statement that the defense had a lower quality video which they only discovered to be low quality last Friday. Where they got it from or how it was created is unknown.

What is known is that the defense had months to look at this video.

If the defense is being honest, they would have asked for a mistrial based on this low quality video last Friday.

Instead, they waited until the jury was in a long deliberation, then pulled this out of nowhere.

Sounds like the defense created this low quality video in a desperate attempt to get the judge to declare a mistrial.

Then why is the Prosecution trying to claim that the degradation was the result of the evidence being sent from an I Phone. This is at best a screwup by the state which the prosecution is legally responsible for, or deliberate misconduct by the prosecution. One is bad, the second worse.

 

[Aletheia4u]

I really don't care much about this case. It is because I know that it is a false flag stunt done by the Deep state.



The Deep state haven't done nothing illegal yet because they are not that stupid. That is why they have made it legal for them to propagandize the public. And that is why they are sticking with the story that Russian agents have infiltrated this country and have created homegrown domestic terrorist groups to destroy our democracy.

They know that they have to keep that narrative going in order to use parts of the NDAA Patriot Act that allows them to propagandize the public and hold secret court hearings that allows them to have trials without juries and appoint their own judges and D.A.s. That they have made these laws to protect themselves from being prosecuted.

And the only reason why they are broadcasting this case live and keeping other cases behind closed doors without any media's coverage? It is because this is what they want the public to see.

You guys may as well watch reruns of Perry Mason and discuss it on this site, instead of that fake trial.



Universities have mock trials demonstrations for their students to practice in a courtroom setting in front of a real judge. They hire actors like crisis actors to pretend that they are actually in a real courtroom. And some of these actors don't know how to cry like that father at the Sandy Hook shooting.

Mock trial has students thinking quick on their feet - Indiana University Northwest

www.iun.edu

Hillary Clinton "Found" Her Own Voice After Hiring Famous Voice Coach

Hillary Clinton "Found" Her Own Voice After Hiring Famous Voice Coach

www.huffpost.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

There is no evidence whatsoever that the prosecutor did not give the high quality video to the State Crime lab.

You missed the video of the prosecutor's pathetic attempt to explain why he sent the defense attorney a low res version.

 

[AZrailwhale]

The prosecution was showing the high quality video throughout the trial.

The defense must have been pretty stupid not to see the difference.

The only justification for a mistrial is if the judge finds that the defendants lawyers were incompetent.

According to the prosecution, they were showing "enhanced" versions of the video supplied to the defense.