SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
Irrelevant to his claim of self-defense.
Even if true, it is irrelevant to his claim of self-defense.
Even if true, it is irrelevant to his claim of self-defense.
So nothing preceding the actual shooting is relevant in your mind. Ok.
Explain why we don’t allow an armed robber to claim self defense for shooting the clerk? The robbery is irrelevant. The possession of the weapon is irrelevant. The only relevant facts are the clerk tried to attack the robber. Self defense. Turn him loose right?