Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,051
- 25,594
- 2,173
What’s unnatural about it?The fructose in high fructose corn syrup is not natural.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s unnatural about it?The fructose in high fructose corn syrup is not natural.
RFK Jr, like Trump, isn’t really trying to make anything healthier. They’re peddling easy answers to low information people in order to gain attention and money.
Banning HFCS is pointless. The problem isn’t the ingredient, it’s the consumption.
But people don’t want to hear that. They want a scapegoat, something to blame that isn’t themselves.
You’re not fat because you pound 2 L of Mt Dew a day, it’s because there’s HFCS. That’s what they hear. It’s totally wrong.
JD Vance will call him a woke elitist.Maybe he can ban Mt Dew next.
Coca Cola has been using high fructose corn syrup in the USA since I think the 1980s. Mexico doesn't allow it so Coca Cola in Mexico is sweetened with plain cane sugar. Mexican Coca Cola tastes really good.So what do you replace it with?
Do you know the difference between cane sugar and HFCS?Coca Cola has been using high fructose corn syrup in the USA since I think the 1980s. Mexico doesn't allow it so Coca Cola in Mexico is sweetened with plain cane sugar. Mexican Coca Cola tastes really good.
The abnormal concentration of fructose in our food.What’s unnatural about it?
Cane sugar is 50% fructose. Are you going to ban that too?The abnormal concentration of fructose in our food.
Um, I have no authority to ban anything.Cane sugar is 50% fructose. Are you going to ban that too?
Obviously. Are you intentionally avoiding the point?Um, I have no authority to ban anything.
RFK Jr, like Trump, isn’t really trying to make anything healthier. They’re peddling easy answers to low information people in order to gain attention and money.
Banning HFCS is pointless. The problem isn’t the ingredient, it’s the consumption.
But people don’t want to hear that. They want a scapegoat, something to blame that isn’t themselves.
You’re not fat because you pound 2 L of Mt Dew a day, it’s because there’s HFCS. That’s what they hear. It’s totally wrong.
I stand by the points I have already made. Would you like to comment on those?Obviously. Are you intentionally avoiding the point?
I don’t disagree.Of course people can choose to live healthy lifestyles or unhealthy ones. Unfortunately many who begin in their youth obesity may have a metabolic disadvantage set for life. They are victims of a kind.
You’re avoiding my points.I stand by the points I have already made. Would you like to comment on those?
This is the scapegoating.There's never been any question about the deadly poison of high fructose corn syrup in yhe North American diet.
That's what we need to ban - consumers making their own choices. They're doing it wrong!The problem is entirely in the choices made by consumers.
This is the scapegoating.
Sugar is sugar. Replace HFCS with cane sugar and you equal amount of disease.
The problem is entirely in the choices made by consumers.
What’s your point?Children cannot make choices
Right. Their parents must do that for them.Children cannot make choices
Right. Their parents must do that for them.