toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Thread starter
- #21
You are clueless on how the founders created our electoral college.It's not how the founders intended....the Winner takes all Electors in each state.... by doing this in 48 of the states with only 2 states left that issue electors proportionate to their population vote, it disenfranchises the citizen's who did not vote for the other candidate.... You claim ZERO citizen's voted for the loser, and take their votes and add their votes to the winner, to give the winner ALL OF THE ELECTORS..... electors are issued to each state for each congressional district they have....each congressman's district is for every 700,000 citizens, so one elector for every 700k in citizens...I am sick of hearing that Hillary won the "popular vote" when that doesn't even count for anything! What counts is the popular vote AT THE STATE LEVEL, after that, it becomes 50 STATE elections. You don't win a country,
YOU WIN STATES.
You'd think democrats and Hillary would KNOW that considering that she was both First Lady, New York Senator and Secretary of STATE.
So I went back and wanted to look at the data a bit different way.
I'm also sick of hearing how pathetic the red states are. So I wanted to know, just what WAS each candidate really up against in 2016 and what did they really win?
In 2016, Hillary won TWENTY states, Trump won THIRTY. To win a state, you have to go up against all voters in a given state; the more people, the more likely voters so, the harder it is to win. And by winning a state, you also win and carry the voice of that state and the people that go in it. So what exactly did the 2016 candidates win?
I looked up the latest tallies of state population, and in the 20 states that Hillary won, her states total population (THE BLUE STATES) was: 2016 BLUE STATE POPULATION = 140,743,676.
And the thirty states that Trump won? 2016 RED STATE POPULATION = 163,435,276.
Yes. Trump's states have 22,691,600 more people in them. A not so small fact I've never seen mentioned before. What is the significance of this?
Trump won 30 states with nearly 23 million more people in them compared to Hillary's 20 states. Not only does that mean you had to carry sway with more people in more states (and by implication, means Trump represented a far greater diversity of the nation!), it means that there are many millions of people who either didn't vote last time or voted against Trump in states he won before who could decide to come out and vote this time or switch their vote to Trump after the recent fiasco of years of Democrats making false claims and accusations all proven wrong and spending tens of millions of dollars of hard earned taxpayer money on silly Russia investigations and a baseless, desperate, petulant, childish impeachment that was nothing more than an abuse of House power resulting in a near Constitutional crisis.
Democrats have stirred up an angry hornets nest, meantime, with the likes of who they have to represent them this time, Democrats may find many of themselves demoralized bowing to the futility.
The 50 US States Ranked By Population
In case anyone wants to check my math.
Trump has 30 states and a potential of up to TWENTY MILLION additional voters this time around, his supporters are pissed, and that is if he doesn't even win any additional states!
Democrats CAN'T feel good about that.
Plus 2 electors, representing each state's 2 Senators.....
The manipulation of these states issuing their electors by giving them ALL to the winner, and not proportionately by how the citizens voted in their state, is wrong, and should not be done that way....it's what messes up the electors vote of each state....And the overall national election.
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. Always same ol' story with you. You don't like the EC and want mob rule and one national vote so that three states decide every election. Just admit it.
You wanna bet?