"Trump's mob" ? He hire them. I have no doubt that thereTrump's mob was attacking police not antifa.
were some hires ------but not on the payroll of Trump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Trump's mob" ? He hire them. I have no doubt that thereTrump's mob was attacking police not antifa.
A fraudulent vote based on Trump's lies. There is still NO evidence.
Yet not a single secretary of state or governor said the vote was fraudulent.
No other US president had refused a peaceful transition ... Trump TOLD them to stop the EC certification.
Trump told them to peacefully protest and put pressure on the Congress, to stop the certification.
The riot was a surprise, to just about everyone.
There has been no evidence presented to suggest widespread voter fraud. Therefore, my faith in the system is secure. I don't need to prove anything. The system worked as it should.The only thing you have is faith in the system, and a lot of us don't have that anymore.
You have no smoking gun to prove your point either, just faith.
Are you really this dense. You made the claim that the insurrectionists went to DC to overturn a "fraudulent" election. Who determines that there was significant fraud committed? Perhaps it would have been better to state they went to DC to overturn an election that they "believed" was fraudulent. And in America, that ain't the way it works. Vigilante justice, while often times appearing, has never been supported by the US Constitution. It is the tool of the despot as was eloquently demonstrated by Trump's use of it on 1/06.
You keep carrying the torch for this woman and making the same stale argument about no firearms.
Again, who needs guns when you have the sheer numbers and you have your enemy overwhelmed?
All she needs to do is make it up through that window into the lobby and she unlocks the doors for
the angry mob who are then in the Speaker's lobby one door away from the floor of the House and
hostages ready for the mob's taking.
It's too bad this woman bought the Big Lie. It got her killed.
No amount of hand wringing will change that.
Fighting back? By rioting at the Capital? Talk about mental gymnastics, what part of that violent outbreak do you find justified? Legal? I mean are the courts there for shits and giggles?No, you are endorsing fighting back against what people consider a compromised election. No insurrection is assumed, except by vapid morons like you.
It's amazing the mental (I use that term loosely) gymnastics TDS idiots like you do to justify your supposed viewpoints.
This is a lie.
The only people with firearms? BS.Tell us again how you feared for your life but survived the protest after the only people with firearms, namely the Capitol police, murdered a unarmed female protestor.
I'm sure you were terrified!
View attachment 517923
You people kept making the same old stale arguments all last year that the burning, looting, and murdering, happening in those cities were just somewhat peaceful protests.
News for you they were insurrections.
Are you saying that our congresspersons fear the people?
Then perhaps they should be listening more closely to the real heartbeat of the country and not the crazed morons, like you, who think that the wrongs of the ancient past are somehow relevant today in their futile search for systemic racism and social justice as they tear everything down in fits of childish anger and revenge.
*****SMILE*****
Prove it.The only people with firearms? BS.
Hearsay.There were certainly insurrectionists hiding their guns, it's called CC.
More hearsay. I've seen no statement from an official force that states she had a weapon.Nobody knew if Babbitt, a Military Veteran, who certainly has training with guns, had a weapon or not.
You can prove this or is it just more hearsay?Babbitt could see the lawmakers on the other side of the window.
You've checked the backgrounds of all the people that broke those windows or is this just more hearsay?Trump supporters busted out a window leading directly to the lawmakers, who were in the hallway.
I don't believe you.The two sentences above ^^^^^^^ are in FACT, true. It's not debatable.
There was a sign stating it was a restricted area? I didn't notice one in the photograph.Babbitt attempted to enter the restricted area, where the lawmakers were. Another FACT.
Perhaps she just wanted a tour of the Capitol.I'll ask you......."What was her intention, her motivation, her desired outcome, etc., after she gets through the window?"
LOL. Sure. Protests in cities hundreds and thousands of miles away were insurrections..determined to overthrow the government..jeez I almost can't make it through saying it with a straight face. And as I recall, there were multiple arrests after those protests.
Do you need a chiropractor? Because twisting yourself into a pretzel to excuse what went down on January 6th must be killing your back.
You do see the tide turning in the last election? The suburban college educated women? The people of color, a lot of whom finally got the chance to vote?..all lining up to show the last guy the door? Thank your lucky stars it didn't filter down ballot or you'd be really screwed. Those people and the yung uns coming up to vote? That's the swan song being sung for the "heartbeat of the country"....which I have no idea of what that means, other than just another attempt at division pimping.
Rewriting history is the job of you Marxist assholes.
Prove it.
Hearsay.
More hearsay. I've seen no statement from an official force that states she had a weapon.
You can prove this or is it just more hearsay?
You've checked the backgrounds of all the people that broke those windows or is this just more hearsay?
I don't believe you.
There was a sign stating it was a restricted area? I didn't notice one in the photograph.
Perhaps she just wanted a tour of the Capitol.
View attachment 517985
*****SMILE*****
You can prove this or is it just more hearsay?Winco said:
Babbitt could see the lawmakers on the other side of the window.
A. It's not their call as to whether it was fraudulent or not. That's election boards and Courts...and they had ruled.Their INTENT was to stop the certification of a fraudulent vote count.
View attachment 517988
Why don't you go have a brunch around the Capitol bistros for a few weeks and let us know how your sowing the wind for more than a year has worked out for you.
*****SMILE*****
You can prove this or is it just more hearsay?
A Day of Rage.
Have you watched it.
It clearly shows the lawmakers on the other side of the window. 27:22
Babbitt is looking through the window. 27:19
A warning is Clearly Shouted, There's a gun, he has a gun. 28:28
Babbitt disregards the warning and Breaches the window 28:32
None of this is hearsay, it's all there on the video.
Hasn't worked out one way or the other. By now, you've wrapped yourself in such clever responses, I don't even know what you're trying to say anymore.
What happened on January 6th was an insurrection. Period. Today's testimony sealed it. Too bad she got shot. But as a military veteran, she should have known better.