Republicans Need to Learn Their Real History on Race.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

The Republicans won the perphial southern states where non-racists from the northern states.

The deep southern states were solidly won by the democrats

You are also ignorant of the fact that racism fell dramatically all across the south while the republicans won.

You are also ignorant to the fact that the democrat party became the party of Acid, Asylym, and Anti-war protesting. Positions that drove democrats out of the party across the entire nation.

You want to hear all the details, all the facts.

The Democratic party embrassing The Black Panthers and other domestic terrorist organizations also drove democrats to the republicans

But yes, lets discuss the details.
The deep south is now mostly Republicans. (See bold) When did the democrats leave?
 
Why would fiscal conservatives have stayed in your racist party? Fiscal conservatism isn't racist, it's about self
reliance. The racists stayed where they were happy, with you
We are talking about Republicans and Democrats... not fiscal conservative or neo liberals or pseudo Democrats...but if you think either party is fiscally conservative I feel bad for you.
 
The deep south is now mostly Republicans. (See bold) When did the democrats leave?

Talk about ignorance and just plain old being a lousy fucking asshole that is about as stupid as they come. I gave you your answers, nicely, while enduring your insults.

But hell, facts with a source is not good enough for you, you need more. Nowhere did I say that Biden was spending $20 trillion on energy, did I. But you being about as stupid as they come, and losing whatever point you are trying to make, you think you can nit pick and make a point that you are right. Well, you are falling flat on your face dummy.

I like that last part of your post. "Any questions? Well resr search it yourself."
Why did you not research it? Most likely because, being a moron you dont know how? Of course that is not the reason. The reason being is you are a hypocrite. You think you are the elite, the smart, that you have already proved something merely by asking a question.

Dumb ass.


actually, it comes from the united nations, the socialist government of your dreams
They United Nations estimates the total to be $76 trillion
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_current/2011wess.pdf

The CERES states $36 Trillion above what is estimated now.

Investing in the Clean Trillion: Closing The Clean Energy Investment Gap Executive Summary — Ceres

So, there it is, a sum well over $20 trillion is said to be needed invested in Green Clean energy. The United Nations puts that sum at $76 trillion! But who pays the bills at the United Nations? That would be the USA. Politicians are dictating they need $76 trillion. But as we all know, the politicians will spend that and take more.
They always do.

The CERES link is broke so here is another link to the same report.


I'm not discussing nor do I care about the Democrats.




Both parties have done that.

Ken Griffin is a businessman. Trump is not. Trump is a grifter and conman.

34 indictments don't indicate no evidence.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

The Republicans won the perphial southern states where non-racists from the northern states moved

The deep southern states were solidly won by the democrats

You are also ignorant of the fact that racism fell dramatically all across the south while the republicans won.

You are also ignorant to the fact that the democrat party became the party of Acid, Asylym, and Anti-war protesting. Positions that drove democrats out of the party across the entire nation.

You want to hear all the details, all the facts.

The Democratic party embrassing The Black Panthers and other domestic terrorist organizations also drove democrats to the republicans

But yes, lets discuss the details.
 
In the 1857 case Dred Scott v. Sandford, the court ruled that slaves aren’t citizens, they’re property. The seven justices who voted in favor of slavery were all Democrats. The two justices who dissented were Republicans.
Only John McLean was a Republican but he was appointed to the SCOTUS in 1829, more than 20 years before the Republican party was formed.
 
However, most American Negroes are descended from the Bantu. These adopted agriculture about four thousand years ago, ...
Please allow me to correct or amend in this issue, since IMO it is important for a fervent racist like IM2, to understand his heritage and those of his self-declared brothers and sisters.

Bantu - is not a uniform ethnicity - but refers to a language group.

Bantu related dialects are only spoken in Southern Africa. E.g. Southern Angola, Namibia, SA, Botswana, Southern Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Southern Zambia. Those along the East-African coast upwards from Mozambique belong to the Nubian/Sudan language group, also termed Nilo-Saharan language family. Those Africans ranging along the coast from Senegal down to Northern Angola and into Zaire/Congo belong to the Kwa language group.

The predominant tribal groups in Southern Africa are the Ovambo, Shona, and Kaffir (they are also the same ethnic group) - Black intruders from the 16th century onward are the predominant tribes of the Zulu, Swazi and Ndebele (Matabele) - originally deriving from the Nubian/Sudan language group of the Masai (some 1000-2000 years ago and started moving in from today's Kenya/Tanzania- no one really knows for certain). The only fact recorded is that Europeans and Zulu's moved into Kaffir territory (tribal homeland) around the same time, thus colliding and warring with each other. Whilst the Zulu's declared themselves as the Masters of all Kaffir's).

Whilst the tribal groups of the Kwa language group practiced agriculture (actual crop-farming) The Kaffir group are predominately, if not solely pastoral - and it was the European settlers that introduced "crop farming" into this region, including tobacco and cotton. Plucking mushrooms and wild fruits can't be really considered as engaging towards agriculture.

The vast majority of IM2 people are from the Kwa language group (knowledgeable in agriculture) - and therefore being recognized useful as slaves by their own kind, Arabs and Europeans. This does not exclude some Slave-hunters bringing in - capturing Bantu speakers - but extremely rare.

The Kwa language group can actually be considered as the intellectual, tribal elite, amongst the Sub-Saharan Africans. This is clearly shown in regards to the USA - since it is evident that Black Americans (aside from being intermixed with Whites) posses a higher degree of intelligence and social behavior - as compared to those of the Kaffir group. Therefore It would be absolutely wrong, to refer towards IM2 or non-Bantu speakers as Kaffir.

Due to the very primitive culture and sociological evolution of the Kaffir group - they were defined/recognized by Zulus, and Europeans as being rather dumb. Therefore the term, Kaffir European wording/Cafir Arab and Hispanic wording, were introduced into the Germanic, and Hispanic language group from the 17th century onward as a synonym for stupidity, or inability to comprehend basic issues, whilst the Arab version of Cafir refers only to being a non-Muslim Black.

This is the reason why Communist/Dictatorial, Genocidal, Murderous and Racist Zimbabwe and SA - implemented the law that forbids to use the term Kaffir. (if one uses it - one goes to jail).
E.g. Zulus, Swazi and Ndebele (Zulu group) also referred to other Bantu's as Kaffir during the European settlement period and during SA Apartheid period.

Almost every killing and murder in today's Zimbabwe and SA is in regards to the Zulu, Swasi, Ndebele group, and the Bantu Kaffir's, going at each other's throats. Independent of 20-30,000 Europeans (some figures go as high as 60,000), having been murdered since 1990. E.g. a Zulu in vast majority does not rob and murder another Zulu. It's this African tribal thingy.

And if one mentions and clarifies all this - IM2 people will inherently exellerate from a fervent racist, full out towards a mentally depraved racist. Citing totally irrelevant issues from 200 years ago, to make himself and lefty&libs feel better.
 
Last edited:
Only John McLean was a Republican but he was appointed to the SCOTUS in 1829, more than 20 years before the Republican party was formed.
And once the Republican party was formed, John McLean became a Republican.

Benjamin Curtis who also dissented was a Conservative, in the Whig Party.

The other seven Supreme Court Justices were all Democrats.
 
So you are saying that Republicans and Democrats physically switched places?
You have no idea what you are talking about.
The Republicans won the peripheral southern states where non-racists from the northern states.
The deep southern states were solidly won by the democrats
You are also ignorant of the fact that racism fell dramatically all across the south while the republicans won.
You are also ignorant to the fact that the democrat party became the party of Acid, Asylum, and Anti-war protesting. Positions that drove democrats out of the party across the entire nation.
You want to hear all the details, all the facts.
The Democratic party embracing The Black Panthers and other domestic terrorist organizations also drove democrats to the republicans
But yes, lets discuss the details.
 
You have no idea what you are talking about.
The Republicans won the peripheral southern states where non-racists from the northern states.
The deep southern states were solidly won by the democrats
You are also ignorant of the fact that racism fell dramatically all across the south while the republicans won.
You are also ignorant to the fact that the democrat party became the party of Acid, Asylum, and Anti-war protesting. Positions that drove democrats out of the party across the entire nation.
You want to hear all the details, all the facts.
The Democratic party embracing The Black Panthers and other domestic terrorist organizations also drove democrats to the republicans
But yes, lets discuss the details.
You are repeating yourself. Almost like you are reading from a script.

You are either not listening to my point or you don't understand.

Do you see the above I highlighted in bold?

Good. Now how can the Republicans have won the south without displacing the civil war Democrats?

Their are only two possible explanations.

1. The parties switched places politically.

2. The parties switched places geographically.

How else can you explain this map?

Screenshot_20230303-074455~2.png


So which was it?
 
You are repeating yourself. Almost like you are reading from a script.

You are either not listening to my point or you don't understand.

Do you see the above I highlighted in bold?

Good. Now how can the Republicans have won the south without displacing the civil war Democrats?

Their are only two possible explanations.

1. The parties switched places politically.

2. The parties switched places geographically.

How else can you explain this map?

View attachment 790922

So which was it?

Can you explain why the racists in the South voted for the Civil Rights hero Barry Goldwater, while the rest of the country voted for the racist and likely klan member Lyndon Johnson?

It had to do with painting Goldwater as a dangerous individual who would get us into war with Russia……another lie from the racist LBJ campaign….,

Do you understand that Barry Goldwater was a life long Civil Rights hero?

Do you understand that LBJ was a life long racist who voted against every single Civil Rights act, and even the anti-lynching laws…….until the very end when he realized the democrats had to vote for the 1964 act or lose national elections forever?

You don’t know what you are talking about…..but please, continue to be a useful idiot for the racist democrat party….
 
Can you explain why the racists in the South voted for the Civil Rights hero Barry Goldwater, while the rest of the country voted for the racist and likely klan member Lyndon Johnson?

It had to do with painting Goldwater as a dangerous individual who would get us into war with Russia……another lie from the racist LBJ campaign….,

Do you understand that Barry Goldwater was a life long Civil Rights hero?

Do you understand that LBJ was a life long racist who voted against every single Civil Rights act, and even the anti-lynching laws…….until the very end when he realized the democrats had to vote for the 1964 act or lose national elections forever?

You don’t know what you are talking about…..but please, continue to be a useful idiot for the racist democrat party….
Lyndon Johnson was never a member of the Ku Klux Klan. Barry Goldwater lost to Johnson in a landslide and the Democrats won two to one majorities on both houses of Congress because Goldwater wanted to repeal the reforms of the New Deal, and he wanted to provoke a war with the Soviet Union.
 
Lyndon Johnson was never a member of the Ku Klux Klan. Barry Goldwater lost to Johnson in a landslide and the Democrats won two to one majorities on both houses of Congress because Goldwater wanted to repeal the reforms of the New Deal, and he wanted to provoke a war with the Soviet Union.

And....bullshit
 
And once the Republican party was formed, John McLean became a Republican.

Benjamin Curtis who also dissented was a Conservative, in the Whig Party.

The other seven Supreme Court Justices were all Democrats.
So you're admitting none of the Justices in the Dred Scott decision were Republicans?
Thanks for clearing up yet another MAGA lie.
 
So you're admitting none of the Justices in the Dred Scott decision were Republicans?
Thanks for clearing up yet another MAGA lie.
The Dred Scott decision denied African Americans their freedom.

I am fine with everyone knowing that the Democratic Party Justices denied freedom to African Americans and no republicans or conservatives denied African Americans freedom.
 
You are repeating yourself. Almost like you are reading from a script.

You are either not listening to my point or you don't understand.

Do you see the above I highlighted in bold?

Good. Now how can the Republicans have won the south without displacing the civil war Democrats?

Their are only two possible explanations.

1. The parties switched places politically.

2. The parties switched places geographically.

How else can you explain this map?

View attachment 790922

So which was it?
It was neither, your question is a false premise.

The Democratic Party owns racism and hate. It is your history, it is your base today.
 
The Dred Scott decision denied African Americans their freedom.

I am fine with everyone knowing that the Democratic Party Justices denied freedom to African Americans and no republicans or conservatives denied African Americans freedom.
They were all "conservatives"
JUST LIKE YOU
 
They were all "conservatives"
JUST LIKE YOU
The Dred Scott decision, first you state it was no Republicans, now you claim it was all conservatives.

You are partially right,

it was all conservatives that stated it was wrong to deny African American's their freedom.

The Democratic Party majority voted together, denying freedom to African American's that lived in free states, asserting that they were property.
 

Forum List

Back
Top