Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingBy your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per residentWow, have you got anything else you can pull out of your ass???California pays more into the Federal coffers than they receive.Why is California constantly crying for more federal money???
But I have a solution, since the state can't declare bankruptcy...
We can just give it to Mexico and they can have all the Mexican citizens they want... Heck, they can even have all the "migrants" from Central America, since Mexico has offered THEM asylum!!!
Expecting more in return is crying?
How much money does your state receive from the federal government? Check out this list.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states – including Vermont and California – ultimately get more money back than they contribute.
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
I didn’t say welfare, I said Federal Funding which can include public works projects, jobs, subsidies...Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingBy your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per residentWow, have you got anything else you can pull out of your ass???California pays more into the Federal coffers than they receive.
Expecting more in return is crying?
How much money does your state receive from the federal government? Check out this list.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states – including Vermont and California – ultimately get more money back than they contribute.
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
States don't need federal funding, people do. Per capita tell us an entirely different story about who the real moochers are.
View attachment 302468
Do Red States Really Take the Most Welfare? – Dan Bongino
I didn’t say welfare, I said Federal Funding which can include public works projects, jobs, subsidies...Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingBy your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per residentWow, have you got anything else you can pull out of your ass???
How much money does your state receive from the federal government? Check out this list.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states – including Vermont and California – ultimately get more money back than they contribute.
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
States don't need federal funding, people do. Per capita tell us an entirely different story about who the real moochers are.
View attachment 302468
Do Red States Really Take the Most Welfare? – Dan Bongino
Red States receive more than they put in
Rural areas are supported by urban areas
I didn’t say welfare, I said Federal Funding which can include public works projects, jobs, subsidies...Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingBy your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per resident
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
States don't need federal funding, people do. Per capita tell us an entirely different story about who the real moochers are.
View attachment 302468
Do Red States Really Take the Most Welfare? – Dan Bongino
Red States receive more than they put in
Rural areas are supported by urban areas
And yet you haven't provided any evidence of that. As I stated, cities don't support the sticks. It may come from the state or it may come from federal, but not cities.
As it's been pointed out, military is also included in federal funding, and as I have pointed out, blue states pay more because their cost of living is more. That's why when Trump put a limit on mortgage interest rate deductions, nobody from red states complained. It was the blue states who copped a bitch.
I didn’t say welfare, I said Federal Funding which can include public works projects, jobs, subsidies...Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingBy your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per residentWow, have you got anything else you can pull out of your ass???
How much money does your state receive from the federal government? Check out this list.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states – including Vermont and California – ultimately get more money back than they contribute.
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
States don't need federal funding, people do. Per capita tell us an entirely different story about who the real moochers are.
View attachment 302468
Do Red States Really Take the Most Welfare? – Dan Bongino
Red States receive more than they put in
Rural areas are supported by urban areas
I didn’t say welfare, I said Federal Funding which can include public works projects, jobs, subsidies...Which amounts to blue states contributing significantly more than red states do. If the cost of living is so high in blue states, you would think they would receive MORE in federal fundingThe only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
They don’t, that funding goes to Red States
States don't need federal funding, people do. Per capita tell us an entirely different story about who the real moochers are.
View attachment 302468
Do Red States Really Take the Most Welfare? – Dan Bongino
Red States receive more than they put in
Rural areas are supported by urban areas
And yet you haven't provided any evidence of that. As I stated, cities don't support the sticks. It may come from the state or it may come from federal, but not cities.
As it's been pointed out, military is also included in federal funding, and as I have pointed out, blue states pay more because their cost of living is more. That's why when Trump put a limit on mortgage interest rate deductions, nobody from red states complained. It was the blue states who copped a bitch.
Let’s look at a simple example......Electrical Power
If a power company runs a mile of cable in an urban area, thousands of families draw off of it
If a power company runs a mile of cable in a rural area, two or three families may draw power of it
Why would a power company ever run power to rural areas? There is no profit in it.
So, why do they do it? Because urban customers paid a rural electrification fee to subsidize providing power to rural areas. Power companies also received federal funding to provide power in rural areas
And yet you've been 100% inaccurate on everything you've posted about both. So you're telling us you're doing that intentionally? To spread misinformation for the purposes of propaganda? Wow.When it comes to government and US History, I am a stable geniusMuch like your ignorance about government and U.S. history...our prison population has escalated in the past few decades
One of the left's favorite little lies. Detroit (red) filed bankruptcy. California (red) is drowning in hundreds of billions in debt and will soon follow. Wherever left-wing policy is implemented, collapse and poverty soon follow (as does moral bankruptcy).Red States are supported by Blue States
Doing things to help people is not Socialism"Free shit" is what the Democrat/Socialists want us all to think is Socialism.it’s a phrase used by republicans to denigrate the left for wanting tuition free college or socialized healthcare, but they don’t really understand how these concepts are no different than programs already in place.
When a republican’s house is on fire or they need police assistance do they pay the responders personally? Uh no. They keep the “free shit”. You see, something like free tuition or socialized medicine are no different. All of these programs are paid for with tax payer revenue. Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Socialism is all about the takeover of private property by the federal government.
Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
By your link, California is 40 at a whopping $12 per residentWow, have you got anything else you can pull out of your ass???California pays more into the Federal coffers than they receive.Why is California constantly crying for more federal money???If they are bankrupt, why are they forced to support red states?
But I have a solution, since the state can't declare bankruptcy...
We can just give it to Mexico and they can have all the Mexican citizens they want... Heck, they can even have all the "migrants" from Central America, since Mexico has offered THEM asylum!!!
Expecting more in return is crying?
How much money does your state receive from the federal government? Check out this list.
The total amount the federal government collected from each state in the 2017 fiscal year ranged from $5.6 billion from Vermont to $435.6 billion from California. The majority of states – including Vermont and California – ultimately get more money back than they contribute.
My state, NJ pays a whopping $2,600 more per resident than they receive
Most of the top ten in receiving federal funds are red states
The only thing that defines a red state and blue state is how they voted last presidential election. Nothing else.
When I watch HGTV and house sales or renovations, I'm stunned at what homes cost in blue states. For what you buy there for 800K, you can get for less than 300K here. Because the cost of living is so high in blue states, wages have to pay more to be middle class, and of course, that means higher tax contributions to the federal government. It's not that they have anything more than we do, it's just that for what they have, they pay much more for it.
View attachment 302456
Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Democratic Economists Say Bernie Sanders’s Math Doesn’t Add Up
"Four leading Democratic economists sharply criticized Sen. Bernie Sanders for citing “extreme claims” about the economic effects of his campaign proposals, the latest in a stream of critiques from Democrats over details of his platform.
Criticism has also been directed at Mr. Sanders’s plan for a single-payer, government-run health-care plan, with critics saying he underestimates the costs of providing health care to all Americans and overestimates the revenue his plan would generate."
I would add that every single new spending program over the past 20 years has ended up costing way way more than it was "estimated," and a good reason why is the Hunter Biden effect, that the politicians, especially Dems, STEAL.... and STEAL AND STEAL AND STEAL....
Duncan HuntER is a Post 1998 "Republican," meaning he cares about Israel and nothing else...
I don’t think his tax plan is solid, but the idea of a single payer system is still very much realistic. The program can easily be paid for if we make cuts to our defense spending as well as higher tax rate. It wouldn’t need to be as high as Bernie is suggesting.Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Democratic Economists Say Bernie Sanders’s Math Doesn’t Add Up
"Four leading Democratic economists sharply criticized Sen. Bernie Sanders for citing “extreme claims” about the economic effects of his campaign proposals, the latest in a stream of critiques from Democrats over details of his platform.
Criticism has also been directed at Mr. Sanders’s plan for a single-payer, government-run health-care plan, with critics saying he underestimates the costs of providing health care to all Americans and overestimates the revenue his plan would generate."
I would add that every single new spending program over the past 20 years has ended up costing way way more than it was "estimated," and a good reason why is the Hunter Biden effect, that the politicians, especially Dems, STEAL.... and STEAL AND STEAL AND STEAL....
I don’t think his tax plan is solid, but the idea of a single payer system is still very much realistic. The program can easily be paid for if we make cuts to our defense spending as well as higher tax rate. It wouldn’t need to be as high as Bernie is suggesting.Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Democratic Economists Say Bernie Sanders’s Math Doesn’t Add Up
"Four leading Democratic economists sharply criticized Sen. Bernie Sanders for citing “extreme claims” about the economic effects of his campaign proposals, the latest in a stream of critiques from Democrats over details of his platform.
Criticism has also been directed at Mr. Sanders’s plan for a single-payer, government-run health-care plan, with critics saying he underestimates the costs of providing health care to all Americans and overestimates the revenue his plan would generate."
I would add that every single new spending program over the past 20 years has ended up costing way way more than it was "estimated," and a good reason why is the Hunter Biden effect, that the politicians, especially Dems, STEAL.... and STEAL AND STEAL AND STEAL....
No...that charity.Doing things to help people is not Socialism"Free shit" is what the Democrat/Socialists want us all to think is Socialism.it’s a phrase used by republicans to denigrate the left for wanting tuition free college or socialized healthcare, but they don’t really understand how these concepts are no different than programs already in place.
When a republican’s house is on fire or they need police assistance do they pay the responders personally? Uh no. They keep the “free shit”. You see, something like free tuition or socialized medicine are no different. All of these programs are paid for with tax payer revenue. Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Socialism is all about the takeover of private property by the federal government.
No, that is what modern governments doNo...that charity.Doing things to help people is not Socialism"Free shit" is what the Democrat/Socialists want us all to think is Socialism.it’s a phrase used by republicans to denigrate the left for wanting tuition free college or socialized healthcare, but they don’t really understand how these concepts are no different than programs already in place.
When a republican’s house is on fire or they need police assistance do they pay the responders personally? Uh no. They keep the “free shit”. You see, something like free tuition or socialized medicine are no different. All of these programs are paid for with tax payer revenue. Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Socialism is all about the takeover of private property by the federal government.
Socialists aren't into charity.....they're into forcing compliance.
Sad, but trueNo, that is what modern governments doNo...that charity.Doing things to help people is not Socialism"Free shit" is what the Democrat/Socialists want us all to think is Socialism.it’s a phrase used by republicans to denigrate the left for wanting tuition free college or socialized healthcare, but they don’t really understand how these concepts are no different than programs already in place.
When a republican’s house is on fire or they need police assistance do they pay the responders personally? Uh no. They keep the “free shit”. You see, something like free tuition or socialized medicine are no different. All of these programs are paid for with tax payer revenue. Bernie, after all, has tax proposals to pay for his ideas.
Socialism is all about the takeover of private property by the federal government.
Socialists aren't into charity.....they're into forcing compliance.
