Republican lawmaker calls for Kyle Rittenhouse, who is on trial for murder, to be elected to Congress

You claim your hero is a victim, not the aggressor, despite all evidence to the contrary.
I haven't said any such thing. You are still a disgusting liar.
You claimed Rittenhouse was shooting into a crowd, not defending himself from the attack of your pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it at an underage kid who defended himself from your pedo hero felon.
Great, let's see your evidence the pedofile was armed and fired it at Rittenhouse...
It's not my evidence, Stupid. It is the facts of the case. Not my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand.
I'll accept that as you made that shit up, Spunky. He wasn't armed.

Are you really so fucking stupid you think the charges filed by the state lay out all the facts for the defense? Please tell us you aren't that fucking stupid.

The defense has released video showing shots were fired at Rittenhouse before he defended himself.

Two sides to every story, Simpleton.
LOLOL

Slobbers the forum retard who punted on first down when challenged to produce evidence supporting his bullshit.

:lmao:
As I stated before, it isn't my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand. You choose to listen to half the story, which is what keeps you ignorant.
It is your job to prove what you claim. You claimed a, "pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it...,"

Your utter inability to prove that ridiculously absurd comment reveals you simply made it up.
:itsok:
LOLOL

Emoticons in lieu of proving your claims are not bullshit? That speaks for ya.

:abgg2q.jpg:
You sure do get bent when someone speaks ill of your pedo hero.
No, I challenge people to prove their claims when I know they're lying. And when they're lying, as I suspect, they can't prove their claims. Just as you couldn't.
 



A white supremacist lawmaker calling for a teen murderer to be elected to Congress, such is the soul of the GOP and its far right, fascist element.
No worries. Just another rightard who's unaware the Constitution doesn't allow for teenagers to be elected to Congress.
Mentally ill people arent supposed to be elected to Congress, but you fucking retarded slaves sure do keep putting them there, Adam Shitface, Penguin Nadler, Nan From SanFransicko, Hank(Guam is sinking) Johnson, the list goes on and on...
 
You claim your hero is a victim, not the aggressor, despite all evidence to the contrary.
I haven't said any such thing. You are still a disgusting liar.
You claimed Rittenhouse was shooting into a crowd, not defending himself from the attack of your pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it at an underage kid who defended himself from your pedo hero felon.
Great, let's see your evidence the pedofile was armed and fired it at Rittenhouse...
It's not my evidence, Stupid. It is the facts of the case. Not my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand.
I'll accept that as you made that shit up, Spunky. He wasn't armed.

Are you really so fucking stupid you think the charges filed by the state lay out all the facts for the defense? Please tell us you aren't that fucking stupid.

The defense has released video showing shots were fired at Rittenhouse before he defended himself.

Two sides to every story, Simpleton.
LOLOL

Slobbers the forum retard who punted on first down when challenged to produce evidence supporting his bullshit.

:lmao:
As I stated before, it isn't my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand. You choose to listen to half the story, which is what keeps you ignorant.
It is your job to prove what you claim. You claimed a, "pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it...,"

Your utter inability to prove that ridiculously absurd comment reveals you simply made it up.
:itsok:
LOLOL

Emoticons in lieu of proving your claims are not bullshit? That speaks for ya.

:abgg2q.jpg:
You sure do get bent when someone speaks ill of your pedo hero.
No, I challenge people to prove their claims when I know they're lying. And when they're lying, as I suspect, they can't prove their claims. Just as you couldn't.
Notice how she makes claims but doesnt post anything that can prove her claim? Irony much? Slave....
 
Yeah...dumb ass....because the crowd didn't see the initial shooting....where the violent felon tried to blow up the gas station, then attacked the hispanic teenager when that teenager put out the fire....the reporter on the scene saw the encounter and stated that the violent felon attacked the hispanic teenager.....you doofus.
True. The guy went after Rittenhouse first by grabbing his gun that Rittenhouse was illegally carrying and aiming at people (according to eyewitness testimony).

But Rosenbaum did not have a gun as was previously stated.


No, the 3rd violent felon that attacked the hispanic teenager had the illegal gun....he was the one shot in the arm.......
Oh? What was illegal about him being armed?

The third attacker is a convicted felon...it is illegal for felons to buy, own or carry guns.......
 
No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.
He was with an adult, therefore it was not illegal for him to possess the rifle.

But of course scumbag sick pieces of subhuman scum like you defend the convicted child molester who got shot while attacking a child.

You're a perverted sleezeball.
There is no such law in Wisconsin that makes it legal for a 17 year old to be in possession of a firearm just because they're with an adult. And in case you haven't heard, the guy who purchased that firearm for Rittenhouse has also been charged with felony counts of illegally selling a dangerous weapon to someone under 18.
He didnt sell it, but you go ahead and keep using the prog masters talking point you worthless slave...
 
Yeah...dumb ass....because the crowd didn't see the initial shooting....where the violent felon tried to blow up the gas station, then attacked the hispanic teenager when that teenager put out the fire....the reporter on the scene saw the encounter and stated that the violent felon attacked the hispanic teenager.....you doofus.
True. The guy went after Rittenhouse first by grabbing his gun that Rittenhouse was illegally carrying and aiming at people (according to eyewitness testimony).

But Rosenbaum did not have a gun as was previously stated.


No, the 3rd violent felon that attacked the hispanic teenager had the illegal gun....he was the one shot in the arm.......
Oh? What was illegal about him being armed?

The third attacker is a convicted felon...it is illegal for felons to buy, own or carry guns.......
Unless they are BLM/ATIFA, which are the brown shirts of the new Socialist Democratic Unworkers(because progs are lazy fucks) Party....
 
You claim your hero is a victim, not the aggressor, despite all evidence to the contrary.
I haven't said any such thing. You are still a disgusting liar.
You claimed Rittenhouse was shooting into a crowd, not defending himself from the attack of your pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it at an underage kid who defended himself from your pedo hero felon.
Great, let's see your evidence the pedofile was armed and fired it at Rittenhouse...
It's not my evidence, Stupid. It is the facts of the case. Not my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand.
I'll accept that as you made that shit up, Spunky. He wasn't armed.

Are you really so fucking stupid you think the charges filed by the state lay out all the facts for the defense? Please tell us you aren't that fucking stupid.

The defense has released video showing shots were fired at Rittenhouse before he defended himself.

Two sides to every story, Simpleton.
LOLOL

Slobbers the forum retard who punted on first down when challenged to produce evidence supporting his bullshit.

:lmao:
As I stated before, it isn't my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand. You choose to listen to half the story, which is what keeps you ignorant.
It is your job to prove what you claim. You claimed a, "pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it...,"

Your utter inability to prove that ridiculously absurd comment reveals you simply made it up.
:itsok:
LOLOL

Emoticons in lieu of proving your claims are not bullshit? That speaks for ya.

:abgg2q.jpg:
You sure do get bent when someone speaks ill of your pedo hero.
No, I challenge people to prove their claims when I know they're lying. And when they're lying, as I suspect, they can't prove their claims. Just as you couldn't.
Thanks for proving my point. :itsok:
 
Rittenhouse owned his gun illegally and was not legally allowed to possess that gun that night.
That describes thousands of black kids in the hood

I agree that rittenhouse was reckless and illegal to bring a gun to a riot when he was underage

but to say that means he had no right to defend himself from liberal perverts who intended to do him harm is just nonsense
 



A white supremacist lawmaker calling for a teen murderer to be elected to Congress, such is the soul of the GOP and its far right, fascist element.
No worries. Just another rightard who's unaware the Constitution doesn't allow for teenagers to be elected to Congress.
Mentally ill people arent supposed to be elected to Congress, but you fucking retarded slaves sure do keep putting them there, Adam Shitface, Penguin Nadler, Nan From SanFransicko, Hank(Guam is sinking) Johnson, the list goes on and on...
coffeepaper.gif
 
Yeah...dumb ass....because the crowd didn't see the initial shooting....where the violent felon tried to blow up the gas station, then attacked the hispanic teenager when that teenager put out the fire....the reporter on the scene saw the encounter and stated that the violent felon attacked the hispanic teenager.....you doofus.
True. The guy went after Rittenhouse first by grabbing his gun that Rittenhouse was illegally carrying and aiming at people (according to eyewitness testimony).

But Rosenbaum did not have a gun as was previously stated.


No, the 3rd violent felon that attacked the hispanic teenager had the illegal gun....he was the one shot in the arm.......
Oh? What was illegal about him being armed?

The third attacker is a convicted felon...it is illegal for felons to buy, own or carry guns.......
Oh? Show the felony you think he committed ...
 
Yeah...dumb ass....because the crowd didn't see the initial shooting....where the violent felon tried to blow up the gas station, then attacked the hispanic teenager when that teenager put out the fire....the reporter on the scene saw the encounter and stated that the violent felon attacked the hispanic teenager.....you doofus.
True. The guy went after Rittenhouse first by grabbing his gun that Rittenhouse was illegally carrying and aiming at people (according to eyewitness testimony).

But Rosenbaum did not have a gun as was previously stated.


No, the 3rd violent felon that attacked the hispanic teenager had the illegal gun....he was the one shot in the arm.......
Oh? What was illegal about him being armed?

The third attacker is a convicted felon...it is illegal for felons to buy, own or carry guns.......
Oh? Show the felony you think he committed ...
He was convicted, you raving lunatic. :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg:
 
We should be putting the mayor and city council in jail for allowing riots to take place in their city
 
Rittenhouse owned his gun illegally and was not legally allowed to possess that gun that night.
That describes thousands of black kids in the hood

I agree that rittenhouse was reckless and illegal to bring a gun to a riot when he was underage

but to say that means he had no right to defend himself from liberal perverts who intended to do him harm is just nonsense

But you may give up your right to self defense if you are in the process of committing a crime. That's just a fact.
 



A white supremacist lawmaker calling for a teen murderer to be elected to Congress, such is the soul of the GOP and its far right, fascist element.
Murder? That isnt what they will find in court, it will be self defense....

Do you think child rapists should be part of BLM/ANTIFA?


The way i see it, Kyle was doing the job that the Prog Mayor and Governor told the police not to do. Three cheers for Kyle...
Court Records: Deceased Kenosha Rioter Rosenbaum Was a Child Rapist - The New American
You don't get to shoot people on the street. Even if they are bad people. That's not how it works here. He's a murderer.
 
We should be putting the mayor and city council in jail for allowing riots to take place in their city
We should put Trump in jail for allowing coronavirus to take place in the country.

See how stupid that sounds when it's turned around?
 
No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.
Carrying the illegally purchased weapon across state lines is a federal crime as well.
 
But you may give up your right to self defense if you are in the process of committing a crime. That's just a fact.
You are incorrect

what you are saying is that it was open season on kyle rigtenhouse

which is nonsense
 
No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.
He was with an adult, therefore it was not illegal for him to possess the rifle.

But of course scumbag sick pieces of subhuman scum like you defend the convicted child molester who got shot while attacking a child.

You're a perverted sleezeball.
There is no such law in Wisconsin that makes it legal for a 17 year old to be in possession of a firearm just because they're with an adult. And in case you haven't heard, the guy who purchased that firearm for Rittenhouse has also been charged with felony counts of illegally selling a dangerous weapon to someone under 18.
He didnt sell it, but you go ahead and keep using the prog masters talking point you worthless slave...
LOL

You know you're certifiably insane, don'tcha. Yes, he bought it for Rittenhouse who bought it from him because Rittenhouse was too young to buy one legally as it's illegal to sell such guns to people under 18 in Wisconsin.


Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.
 
No, there is a difference in the law as to whether it is legal for an 18 year old to carry a gun in public....then there are Constitutional issues as well....
There's no constitutional issue and the law is clear about a 17 year old not being able to carry a gun in public.
 
We should put Trump in jail for allowing coronavirus to take place in the country.
Trump did everything in the presidents authority to deal with yhd virus

dem mayors made no effort to end the riots
 

Forum List

Back
Top