Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are theories being bantered about that if he is defeated in '12, he will refuse to step down...
It's apparent to me that this usurper wants to subvert the Constitution by any means possible. I can't believe people voted this Constitutionally ineligible negro in office. This is the result of the first presidential candidate who was never vetted.
Looks like he tried to slip another one through. Of course it won't make it through the house. And if it did the Supreme Court would again end up with it.
You have to wonder why all of this controversial BS from this administration. From the lies of transparency to suing AZ. Come to think of that, How can they sue a State under the 11th? Maybe that's why this is stuck in there?
It's apparent to me that this usurper wants to subvert the Constitution by any means possible. I can't believe people voted this Constitutionally ineligible negro in office. This is the result of the first presidential candidate who was never vetted.
Unbelievable. The Constant erosion of Individual and States Rights, the attack on Justice and fair play by these Totalitarian Dirt Bags, and they act like they have Principal on their side. The use it like toilet paper to increase their power and influence. They are the enemy within. Is there anything about you that you are not willing to sell out or corrupt?
Society, The Economy, Morals...you name it...all corrupted for the cause of Statism.Unbelievable. The Constant erosion of Individual and States Rights, the attack on Justice and fair play by these Totalitarian Dirt Bags, and they act like they have Principal on their side. The use it like toilet paper to increase their power and influence. They are the enemy within. Is there anything about you that you are not willing to sell out or corrupt?
Looks like he tried to slip another one through. Of course it won't make it through the house. And if it did the Supreme Court would again end up with it.
You have to wonder why all of this controversial BS from this administration. From the lies of transparency to suing AZ. Come to think of that, How can they sue a State under the 11th? Maybe that's why this is stuck in there?
Do you even know what you are talking about? Do any of you tea party members know this topic well enough to comment?
You have to wonder why all of this controversial BS from this administration. From the lies of transparency to suing AZ.
Come to think of that, How can they sue a State under the 11th? Maybe that's why this is stuck in there?
Alabama Immigration Law HB56 Enjoined by Federal Judge
In a very brief Order issued late today, Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn, Chief Judge of the Northern District of Alabama, enjoined the enforcement of HB56:
The Order comes in the consolidated cases of Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley; Parsley v. Bentley, and United States v. Bentley. We've previously discussed each of these three lawsuits have been brought against the controversial HB 56.
The Hispanic Interest Coalition case began with a 118 page complaint filed early in July raises eight constitutional claims including claims under the Supremacy Clause (arguing that the state law is pre-empted); Fourth Amendment; Equal Protection Clause; Due Process Clause; First Amendment claims including speech, assembly, and petition clauses, the Contracts Clause, and two Sixth Amendment claims.
Parlsey v. Bentley is the clergy complaint centering on the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause.
United States v. Bentley marks the DOJ's entry into the controversy, raising Supremacy Clause arguments as might be expected.
The law was scheduled to go into effect September 1.
Constitutional Law Prof Blog: Supremacy Clause
Unbelievable. The Constant erosion of Individual and States Rights, the attack on Justice and fair play by these Totalitarian Dirt Bags, and they act like they have Principal on their side. The use it like toilet paper to increase their power and influence. They are the enemy within. Is there anything about you that you are not willing to sell out or corrupt?
Are you referring to the 1908 Supreme Court?
Society, The Economy, Morals...you name it...all corrupted for the cause of Statism.Unbelievable. The Constant erosion of Individual and States Rights, the attack on Justice and fair play by these Totalitarian Dirt Bags, and they act like they have Principal on their side. The use it like toilet paper to increase their power and influence. They are the enemy within. Is there anything about you that you are not willing to sell out or corrupt?
And we are living in Soft Tyranny now and have been for decades (Almost 100 years since the FED was created and the 16th and 17th Amendments were crafted).Society, The Economy, Morals...you name it...all corrupted for the cause of Statism.Unbelievable. The Constant erosion of Individual and States Rights, the attack on Justice and fair play by these Totalitarian Dirt Bags, and they act like they have Principal on their side. The use it like toilet paper to increase their power and influence. They are the enemy within. Is there anything about you that you are not willing to sell out or corrupt?
Even Statism is a tool of a greater Evil. You will know it when the soft Tyranny turns hard, you will know that, just like every Totalitarian State by the Mass Graves.
What did you expect from CON$titutional CON$ervatives.Incorrect.This has just been discovered hidden inside Obama's jobs bill he wants to initiate. It is designed to override a states sovereign authority as defined and protected under the 11th amendment. The new bill states....Any state that receives Federal assistance under the direction of bill automatically forfeits its sovereign immunity. This is what the founders writing our Constitution clearly did not want. With this bill, Obama is doing something that he can not due under current Constitutional rules.
It would seem both the OP and the author of the article cited in the OP are unaware of Ex Parte Young:
The Article asks:
The answer is the Supremacy Clause:
While the Supreme Court has recognized that states have a degree of sovereign immunity, the Court continues to uphold the supremacy of federal law. The Court has held that States cannot be sued in federal court even on federal question claims without their consent. But while the 11th Amendment may shield the state from suits in federal court, the amendment cannot bar review of state court judgments in a federal question context. The Supremacy Clause by its nature requires that the Supreme Court be capable of reviewing federal questions, and the 11th Amendment cannot immunize a state from such review.
Source of the cited above and more about the 11th Amendment:
11th Amendment
I guess the tea party crowd didn't finish reading the "Constitution for dummies".
Deflection. Merely putting dollar signs in a title means exactly squat.What did you expect from CON$titutional CON$ervatives.Incorrect.
It would seem both the OP and the author of the article cited in the OP are unaware of Ex Parte Young:
The Article asks:
The answer is the Supremacy Clause:
Source of the cited above and more about the 11th Amendment:
11th Amendment
I guess the tea party crowd didn't finish reading the "Constitution for dummies".
What did you expect from CON$titutional CON$ervatives.Incorrect.
It would seem both the OP and the author of the article cited in the OP are unaware of Ex Parte Young:
The Article asks:
The answer is the Supremacy Clause:
Source of the cited above and more about the 11th Amendment:
11th Amendment
I guess the tea party crowd didn't finish reading the "Constitution for dummies".
You have to wonder why all of this controversial BS from this administration. From the lies of transparency to suing AZ.
Its only controversial to the Administrations political enemies. Otherwise youd need to cite examples of lies of transparency.
Come to think of that, How can they sue a State under the 11th? Maybe that's why this is stuck in there?
Again, the Supremacy Clause. For example:
Alabama Immigration Law HB56 Enjoined by Federal Judge
In a very brief Order issued late today, Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn, Chief Judge of the Northern District of Alabama, enjoined the enforcement of HB56:
The Order comes in the consolidated cases of Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama v. Bentley; Parsley v. Bentley, and United States v. Bentley. We've previously discussed each of these three lawsuits have been brought against the controversial HB 56.
The Hispanic Interest Coalition case began with a 118 page complaint filed early in July raises eight constitutional claims including claims under the Supremacy Clause (arguing that the state law is pre-empted); Fourth Amendment; Equal Protection Clause; Due Process Clause; First Amendment claims including speech, assembly, and petition clauses, the Contracts Clause, and two Sixth Amendment claims.
Parlsey v. Bentley is the clergy complaint centering on the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause.
United States v. Bentley marks the DOJ's entry into the controversy, raising Supremacy Clause arguments as might be expected.
The law was scheduled to go into effect September 1.
Constitutional Law Prof Blog: Supremacy Clause
Hence the OP and OP article are a non-issue.
She never did. Grow up and act mature. Like I told Warrior. Join the Peace Corps and make something useful of your life where you can gain maturity by learning moral Christian values which you seem to lack.It's apparent to me that this usurper wants to subvert the Constitution by any means possible. I can't believe people voted this Constitutionally ineligible negro in office. This is the result of the first presidential candidate who was never vetted.
what do you think about sarah palin banging eligible negroes, adolph?
