Manonthestreet
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2014
- 37,505
- 27,372
- 2,945
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hor$e$hit, tvaritch...His definition of isolationism is the one always used by statist loving warmongers. If the US isn’t at war, than that’s isolationism. Crazy!
What hasn't worked is Wilsonian do-gooder interventionism....That model made the 20th century the most bloody in human history.It didn't work in the 19th Century... it didn't work in the early 20th... given todays connectivity and lightning fast transoceanic travel... it sure-as-hell won't work in the 21st.
He does in the minds of duped warmongering statist Americans.Doesn’t your article say mitch was mad?
anyhow, not supporting giving more billions, especially when we have our own humanitarian crisis on the southern border, doesn’t mean you are on putin’s side
Look at what the rest of the world and NATO are giving to Ukraine, the US should give in proportion to the other nations, not excessively. It makes me think that there is a "kickback" scheme in there somewhere.Paul... and Paul-ites... are famous for capitalizing on saving taxpayer money at the expense of strategic national interests. Foolhardy myopic isolationist thinking.
As with most things, The Truth probably lies somewhere in the middle... and Paul doesn't have the answer... he never really does...What hasn't worked is Wilsonian do-gooder interventionism....That model made the 20th century the most bloody in human history.
Horse shit Adolf!Hor$e$hit, tvaritch...
The answer is simple. Stop giving our wealth to war profiteers.As with most things, The Truth probably lies somewhere in the middle... and Paul doesn't have the answer... he never really does...
Really pretty simple they just need to include the two together and help Ukraine now. The money is in the bank so to speak (for Ukraine) and Russia has liability for all they have doneHe stopped it?? YOu mean NO 40 Billion to UKRAINE???? AWESOME!!!!
Yet he claims to absolutely love the Founders and revere the constituuuuution. Apparently he’s unaware of what the founders said about war and foreign entanglements.I see that little squeeky guy, Mark Levin, was losing his marbles on the tweeter over the lack of support for the duopoly's war in the Ukraine. He and some other GOPers were going back and forth over it.
Even MTG revealed him for the fraud that he is.
Think he's one of the few left who still supports going into Iraq.
I'm fine - for now - with shoveling extra (above-and-beyond "our fair share") at the Ukrainians...Look at what the rest of the world and NATO are giving to Ukraine, the US should give in proportion to the other nations, not excessively. It makes me think that there is a "kickback" scheme in there somewhere.
![]()
Rand Paul objection delays $40 billion Ukraine aid package
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) hit the brakes Thursday on bipartisan hopes that the Senate could quickly pass nearly $40 billion in Ukraine aid before leaving town for the week. Paul objected to a de…thehill.com
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) hit the brakes Thursday on bipartisan hopes that the Senate could quickly pass nearly $40 billion in Ukraine aid before leaving town for the week. Paul objected to a deal offered by Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) that would have set up votes on Thursday afternoon on the funding and on an amendment from Paul, who wanted to include language in the bill to expand an Afghanistan inspector general role to include oversight of the Ukraine funds.
Thoughts on this GOPer being on Putin's side?
This should cause Mitch to have a miscarriage.![]()
Rand Paul objection delays $40 billion Ukraine aid package
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) hit the brakes Thursday on bipartisan hopes that the Senate could quickly pass nearly $40 billion in Ukraine aid before leaving town for the week. Paul objected to a de…thehill.com
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) hit the brakes Thursday on bipartisan hopes that the Senate could quickly pass nearly $40 billion in Ukraine aid before leaving town for the week. Paul objected to a deal offered by Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) that would have set up votes on Thursday afternoon on the funding and on an amendment from Paul, who wanted to include language in the bill to expand an Afghanistan inspector general role to include oversight of the Ukraine funds.
Thoughts on this GOPer being on Putin's side?
Yet he claims to absolutely love the Founders and revere the constituuuuution. Apparently he’s unaware of what the founders said about war and foreign entanglements.
I seriously doubt that Ukrainian soldiers... holding-on by the skin of their teeth until more materials arrive... would agree...The answer is simple. Stop giving our wealth to war profiteers.
The truth is that you couldn't be more wrong if you were paid to be.As with most things, The Truth probably lies somewhere in the middle... and Paul doesn't have the answer... he never really does...
If you really think that money is going to provide enough arms for them to win, you're even dumber than you're showing us right now.I seriously doubt that Ukrainian soldiers... holding-on by the skin of their teeth until more materials arrive... would agree...
This should cause Mitch to have a miscarriage.