progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 68,022
- 42,774
- 2,615
could you be more specific??He wants to spend money when it benefits himself but he talks against it when it is benefitting others.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
could you be more specific??He wants to spend money when it benefits himself but he talks against it when it is benefitting others.
![]()
Rand Paul Opposition to Disaster Relief Resurfaces as He Seeks Federal Aid
The GOP senator previously voted against disaster relief for Hurricanes Harvey, Maria and Sandy.www.newsweek.com
Well many are quick to mock the Senator but I think that is unkind. I think its to his credit that he is willing to ditch his principles to buy the votes of his constituents.
He doesnt explain where this money should come from ?
Has Senator Paul ever ditched his fiscal conservatism before ?
A bit like the people in other states that needed help and he objected to. Where is the difference ?the money comes from the money people in his state already gave the fed gov,,, dumbass
I'm all for helping them. I'm discussing Rand being two faced.
could you be more specific??A bit like the people in other states that needed help and he objected to. Where is the difference ?
A bit like the people in other states that needed help and he objected to. Where is the difference ?
could you be more specific??
so you dont have any specifics,,I'm on my phone but awhile back he made a big spectacle against one of the spending bills. He made a big show in putting on a filibuster against it. He then voted for it.
Texas for one.could you be more specific??
what state and what help did they need that he objected too??
how do you disagree with a question??I'm on my phone but awhile back he made a big spectacle against one of the spending bills. He made a big show in putting on a filibuster against it. He then voted for it.
so you dont have any specifics,,
spending bills dont mean people in need from a natural disaster,, most times its from their own irresponsible acts,,
specifics matter,,,Sheesh, spending bills still address the needs of others.
the money comes from the money people in his state already gave the fed gov,,, dumbass
Maybe read the articles you attach?
"He said he would have supported the bill if it reappropriated funds from other areas, rather than add on additional spending, reported WFPL, a Louisville-area news radio station.
"I would have given them 9 billion and I would've taken the 9 billion from somewhere else," he said. "I would have taken it from foreign aid and said you know what, we don't have money for Egypt or Pakistan this year because we have to help the Northeast."
what no link??He said that concerning aid for the people hit by storm in the north east. He did not say that about the aid he is seeking for Kentucky..
what no link??
sounds like the best solution is to get the feds out of state business and let states take care of themselves,,It's in the link posted by the OP.
sounds like the best solution is to get the feds out of state business and let states take care of themselves,,
problem solved,,
can you prove that??There is no way Kentucky could address the destruction they have seen on their own.
The best solution is to not be two faced.
Does Rand Paul not protest about this egregious waste of public funds ?![]()
Kentucky is Second Most Dependent State on Federal Money
Kentucky is ranked the second most federally dependent state in the nation.A recent study by WalletHub looked at two key factors: state government…www.wkyufm.org
[I suspect the dumbass is not pknopp]
Kentucky is ranked the second most federally dependent state in the nation.
A recent study by WalletHub looked at two key factors: state government dependency and resident dependency. Kentucky’s government is ranked fourth in dependency on federal money, but is only ranked 23rd in the share of federal jobs. Analyst Jill Gonzalez said there are some drawbacks to being so dependent on federal money.
“So federally if any crisis were going to happen it would probably affect Kentucky more than other states,” she said.
Gonzalez said federal funding makes up about 40 percent of Kentucky’s revenue, the 4th highest rate in the country. However, she said Kentuckians are getting more money back from the federal government than what they put in.
“For every dollar a Kentuckian gives, they’re actually getting $2.61 back so that’s a really good return on their federal investment,” she said.