Questioning the election process is undemocratic

[MaryL]

Dosen't that seem rather antithetical?

 

[MaryL]

So, we get this straight, the 2020 election was a by a clear majority and Biden won fair and square. A majority of Americans WANTED Biden in office?

 

[MaryL]

YouTube and Twitter removes anyone that doesn't follow the enforced narrative. Narratives are great in children's stories or propaganda. Not so much in science or real journalism.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So, we get this straight, the 2020 election was a by a clear majority and Biden won fair and square. A majority of Americans WANTED Biden in office?

No, because the US electoral system doesn't care who people actually want in power.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Democrats had a cow over the Bush/Gore election...remember the hanging chads.

Democrats had 2 cows over the Trump Win in 2016.

And NOW because they 'won', it is undemocrat for conservatives to have serious questions about the veracity of this win. (because they know they cheated) If we allow them to get away with all of this...social media cancellation, cancel culture, double standard of justice, harassing their opposition, imprisoning with out due process and human rights violations, and yes STOLEN ELECTIONS,, then we deserve what we get....and the democrat supporters will get it too.

 

[Oddball]

So, we get this straight, the 2020 election was a by a clear majority and Biden won fair and square. A majority of Americans WANTED Biden in office?

no, and no.

 

[MaryL]

Democrats impeached Trump over unproven allegations, TWICE! Why can't we question the Biden win in 2020 election then? Because democrats say so?

 

[Calypso Jones]

well i think you hit the nail on the head. these dem/marxists want to control your speech, your thoughts, everything.

 

[MarathonMike]

Democrats impeached Trump over unproven allegations, TWICE! Why can't we question the Biden win in 2020 election then? Because democrats say so

I watched the Cyber Ninja's top IT expert prove with 100% certainty that there was major tampering with at least one of the main Dominion System servers. I also watched the Arizona Election Committee let out a collective yawn, and dismiss him with ZERO QUESTIONS about the damning proof he had just presented. At that point, I lost any faith in the truth coming out about the 2020 election fraud that most certainly occurred. That's what we're up against Mary. The system is corrupt.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Dosen't that seem rather antithetical?

If you aren't questioning everything and challenging what needs to be challenged in a democracy you won't have one for long.

 

[22lcidw]

No, because the US electoral system doesn't care who people actually want in power.

The governments of banana republics have no checks and balances. That is why we have tens of millions of illegals here. And we are heading to where they came from.

 

[MaryL]

Well, when Group "A" controls the media then they overwhelmingly forbid questioning their decisions, that isn't a democracy anymore.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Well, when Group "A" controls the media then they overwhelmingly forbid questioning their decisions, that isn't a democracy anymore.

Are you sure it's not the other way around? Maybe it's the media controlling them? They are all certainly operating off of the same set of talking points every day.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The governments of banana republics have no checks and balances. That is why we have tens of millions of illegals here. And we are heading to where they came from.

Well, the US hardly has checks and balances these days.

The Supreme Court, one of the three checks and balances has been Republican since 1970. And yet Democrats have won the popular vote 8 times to the Republicans 5 (and that's 7 to 1 for the 1990s onwards).

That's not a check and balance. That's Republicans controlling it and it only does what the Republicans want, making the US a far more conservative place.

Gerrymandering in the House also leads to a lack of checks and balances. Same for the House, 7 out of the last 8 elections have seen Democrats winning the popular vote, and yet, Republicans won three of those.

The US is a banana republic, the immigrants come because it's a richer banana republic.

 

[Colin norris]

YouTube and Twitter removes anyone that doesn't follow the enforced narrative. Narratives are great in children's stories or propaganda. Not so much in science or real journalism.

Thats a lie. They remove posts which are proven to be wrong and encourage revenge and violence.
Thats why old mogadon got banned.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Dosen't that seem rather antithetical?

In the current political atmosphere? Sure. But magaturds? They seem to shun irony. Pretend it doesn't exist. It's a bit of a problem.

 

[Colin norris]

No, because the US electoral system doesn't care who people actually want in power.

Youre right. They are there to count the votes only.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Well, the US hardly has checks and balances these days.

The Supreme Court, one of the three checks and balances has been Republican since 1970. And yet Democrats have won the popular vote 8 times to the Republicans 5 (and that's 7 to 1 for the 1990s onwards).

That's not a check and balance. That's Republicans controlling it and it only does what the Republicans want, making the US a far more conservative place.

Gerrymandering in the House also leads to a lack of checks and balances. Same for the House, 7 out of the last 8 elections have seen Democrats winning the popular vote, and yet, Republicans won three of those.

The US is a banana republic, the immigrants come because it's a richer banana republic.

If that were true the original meaning and intent of the 2nd Amendment would have been restored by 74 and Roe would have been overturned and the abortion question sent back to the states.

There are probably at least a dozen other decisions that show that cannot be true.

Just because someone is appointed by a Republican President certainly doesn't mean that justice once seated won't become a flaming left wing activist on the bench.

Much greater care needs to be exercised by Republican Presidents in the future with respect to nominees and they should stick only with those with long records of decisions as a constructionist and textualist. If it isn't in there, it isn't in there. No, you don't get to change the wording as a justice of a law you do not like.

 

[Big Bend Texas]

Thats a lie. They remove posts which are proven to be wrong and encourage revenge and violence.
Thats why old mogadon got banned.

Sorry but they are removing valid information including cited studies that go against the Admin/CDC narratives and have been doing so for many months.

 

[cnm]

Dosen't that seem rather antithetical?

Well it's your straw man. You can use as much hay to construct it as you like.