Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Naw, God's word makes the translations that are undertaken by Christians motivated by love of God and a desire to faithfully convey the true meaning of the word inviolate. God's word is in and of itself holy. But when it's deliberately misrepresented in order to change it's meaning, it is no longer God's word, and no longer inviolate.I've brought this question up, but never gotten a satisfactory answer: what happens to someone who doesn't read Jacobean English? Are other translations acceptable in God's eyes for non-English readers? Or is God's word just perfect in 17th century English and everyone else doomed if they weren't enlightened enough (or lucky enough to live post-1604) to read it in the original English? If I can read the original Hebrew and Greek texts, is that okay, or would I be just as guilty of reading false scripture as if I read another translation? What if I take the KJV and make the language user-friendly? Is that heresy or something?
Yes, there are many acceptable translations. The homo one, where they simply removed the bits they don't agree with, isn't one of them.
The King James Version bible is the only acceptable bible to use for Christians and non Christians. The other translations have been altered, many scriptures have been totally removed - others changed so radically you cannot even recognize it as the Word of God.
Baptist Bible Translators Institute - Why the King James Version
A lot of things are left out in other versions.
There are up to 30,000 changes in the various translations of the Bible with the exception of just one. The only one that is unchanged - the only one which does not have any scriptures removed from it - added to it - words changed - is the King James Version Bible. Which is why the enemies of God are working hard to drive it out of print.
Wrong. Here are some of the changes that have been done to the King James Version. Some are minor, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Changes in the King James version
Actually, what you have posted is a lie - the link you have posted is the excuse of so called scholars who took the liberty of removing dozens upon dozens of scriptures from the NIV and other translations. It's all a lie. You are on dangerous ground when you move away from the KJV and embrace these other books.
OK. I'll give you a shot to prove your accusation. Other than your claim, why should I believe it is all a lie? Proof?
Certainly! Here is the evidence. Listen to this video and then you'll know why these new age bible versions are being created to deceive the people. You can trust the King James Version bible as being the pure Word of God.
I've brought this question up, but never gotten a satisfactory answer: what happens to someone who doesn't read Jacobean English? Are other translations acceptable in God's eyes for non-English readers? Or is God's word just perfect in 17th century English and everyone else doomed if they weren't enlightened enough (or lucky enough to live post-1604) to read it in the original English? If I can read the original Hebrew and Greek texts, is that okay, or would I be just as guilty of reading false scripture as if I read another translation? What if I take the KJV and make the language user-friendly? Is that heresy or something?
There are up to 30,000 changes in the various translations of the Bible with the exception of just one. The only one that is unchanged - the only one which does not have any scriptures removed from it - added to it - words changed - is the King James Version Bible. Which is why the enemies of God are working hard to drive it out of print.
Wrong. Here are some of the changes that have been done to the King James Version. Some are minor, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Changes in the King James version
Actually, what you have posted is a lie - the link you have posted is the excuse of so called scholars who took the liberty of removing dozens upon dozens of scriptures from the NIV and other translations. It's all a lie. You are on dangerous ground when you move away from the KJV and embrace these other books.
OK. I'll give you a shot to prove your accusation. Other than your claim, why should I believe it is all a lie? Proof?
Certainly! Here is the evidence. Listen to this video and then you'll know why these new age bible versions are being created to deceive the people. You can trust the King James Version bible as being the pure Word of God.
I'm not going to watch some 2,5 hour video. Answer the specific question. Why should I believe the link I gave you is a lie. Are the scholars that put that link together part of some conspiracy? If so, are all bible scholars part of that conspiracy? How can I tell those who are part of it and those who are not, why?
I've brought this question up, but never gotten a satisfactory answer: what happens to someone who doesn't read Jacobean English? Are other translations acceptable in God's eyes for non-English readers? Or is God's word just perfect in 17th century English and everyone else doomed if they weren't enlightened enough (or lucky enough to live post-1604) to read it in the original English? If I can read the original Hebrew and Greek texts, is that okay, or would I be just as guilty of reading false scripture as if I read another translation? What if I take the KJV and make the language user-friendly? Is that heresy or something?
While there have been translations, the NKJ Bible has far fewer changes than others and not to the point of changing the intent of the verse. It can be trusted and as you progress in your studies, a Greek and Hebrew translation becomes necessary to get to the core of the message.
And no, there are some horrendous Bibles out there. Replacement theology ones and now pc ones with no mention of an exclusive way to Heaven. Christ has been removed completely. So be careful if you wander from the NKJ.
Wrong. Here are some of the changes that have been done to the King James Version. Some are minor, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Changes in the King James version
Actually, what you have posted is a lie - the link you have posted is the excuse of so called scholars who took the liberty of removing dozens upon dozens of scriptures from the NIV and other translations. It's all a lie. You are on dangerous ground when you move away from the KJV and embrace these other books.
OK. I'll give you a shot to prove your accusation. Other than your claim, why should I believe it is all a lie? Proof?
Certainly! Here is the evidence. Listen to this video and then you'll know why these new age bible versions are being created to deceive the people. You can trust the King James Version bible as being the pure Word of God.
I'm not going to watch some 2,5 hour video. Answer the specific question. Why should I believe the link I gave you is a lie. Are the scholars that put that link together part of some conspiracy? If so, are all bible scholars part of that conspiracy? How can I tell those who are part of it and those who are not, why?
You said that you would give me a shot to prove my accusation. Now you claim after watching the video for less than 15 minutes that you are not going to watch it due to a time limitation. If you do not care about your own credibility (which is based on your keeping your word) then do not watch it. If you are going to expect me and other people here to listen to you? You are going to keep your word and listen to the entire video.
Your decision. Keep your word or do not keep your word? What is it going to be?
Actually, what you have posted is a lie - the link you have posted is the excuse of so called scholars who took the liberty of removing dozens upon dozens of scriptures from the NIV and other translations. It's all a lie. You are on dangerous ground when you move away from the KJV and embrace these other books.
OK. I'll give you a shot to prove your accusation. Other than your claim, why should I believe it is all a lie? Proof?
Certainly! Here is the evidence. Listen to this video and then you'll know why these new age bible versions are being created to deceive the people. You can trust the King James Version bible as being the pure Word of God.
I'm not going to watch some 2,5 hour video. Answer the specific question. Why should I believe the link I gave you is a lie. Are the scholars that put that link together part of some conspiracy? If so, are all bible scholars part of that conspiracy? How can I tell those who are part of it and those who are not, why?
You said that you would give me a shot to prove my accusation. Now you claim after watching the video for less than 15 minutes that you are not going to watch it due to a time limitation. If you do not care about your own credibility (which is based on your keeping your word) then do not watch it. If you are going to expect me and other people here to listen to you? You are going to keep your word and listen to the entire video.
Your decision. Keep your word or do not keep your word? What is it going to be?
Keep my word? I never promised to watch your silly video. I'm not interested in the changes you claim that are in other versions of the Bible, and that has nothing to do with your claim that my link was a lie. Prove the King James version has not been changed. The information in my link is easy enough to verify. Just look up the different versions mentioned, and compare what is written. Show me where one of the changes claimed is not verified.
Should "purists" learn the original language of any given text for better understanding?I've brought this question up, but never gotten a satisfactory answer: what happens to someone who doesn't read Jacobean English? Are other translations acceptable in God's eyes for non-English readers? Or is God's word just perfect in 17th century English and everyone else doomed if they weren't enlightened enough (or lucky enough to live post-1604) to read it in the original English? If I can read the original Hebrew and Greek texts, is that okay, or would I be just as guilty of reading false scripture as if I read another translation? What if I take the KJV and make the language user-friendly? Is that heresy or something?
Should "purists" learn the original language of any given text for better understanding?I've brought this question up, but never gotten a satisfactory answer: what happens to someone who doesn't read Jacobean English? Are other translations acceptable in God's eyes for non-English readers? Or is God's word just perfect in 17th century English and everyone else doomed if they weren't enlightened enough (or lucky enough to live post-1604) to read it in the original English? If I can read the original Hebrew and Greek texts, is that okay, or would I be just as guilty of reading false scripture as if I read another translation? What if I take the KJV and make the language user-friendly? Is that heresy or something?
