JoeMoma
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2014
- 22,847
- 10,546
- 950
Romans 3:23
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Queen James Bible, what do you think?
- Thread starter Marianne
- Start date
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
One of my favorites.Romans 3:23To treat them as sinful is very Christian.Yet another instance of how the left seeks to control religion.
Mormons have come out to respect the rights of gays and agrees they should be treated with dignity.
The bible has many translation errors. People that don't study the history blindly accept the KJB as perfect when it is far from that.
Gays are god's people as well. To treat them as sinful or defective is unchristian and hateful.
Time for some to get their head out their asses and learn to accept people in all their diversity.
Gays are not a threat to marriage, hate is.
If someone steals, they are a thief and stealing is a sin.
Adultery is a sin.
Lying is a sin.
To say that same sexual relations isn't a sin is lying
I know full well that I'm a sinner.
It's the homosexuals that stand to hear it
what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,024
- 2,190
I already told you, I'm not wasting my time double-explaining things that need no explanation. What do you think is fraudulent?what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
Anything to help the sinner relieve their guilt over giving in to the sin.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
i don't think there's any fraud represented by the printing of the book, but it seems you do.I already told you, I'm not wasting my time double-explaining things that need no explanation. What do you think is fraudulent?what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
so what's fraudulent about it? or is this you once again ascribing characteristics that you are not able to back up
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,024
- 2,190
Again, I'm not about explaining the obvious to the deliberately dense.i don't think there's any fraud represented by the printing of the book, but it seems you do.I already told you, I'm not wasting my time double-explaining things that need no explanation. What do you think is fraudulent?what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
so what's fraudulent about it? or is this you once again ascribing characteristics that you are not able to back up
what you're about is making inflammatory accusations that you are unable to back up.Again, I'm not about explaining the obvious to the deliberately dense.i don't think there's any fraud represented by the printing of the book, but it seems you do.I already told you, I'm not wasting my time double-explaining things that need no explanation. What do you think is fraudulent?what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
so what's fraudulent about it? or is this you once again ascribing characteristics that you are not able to back up
what you're about is lying.
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,024
- 2,190
what you're about is making inflammatory accusations that you are unable to back up.Again, I'm not about explaining the obvious to the deliberately dense.i don't think there's any fraud represented by the printing of the book, but it seems you do.I already told you, I'm not wasting my time double-explaining things that need no explanation. What do you think is fraudulent?what's fraudulent?Well that's open for debate but his title was King, not Queen. And they aren't presenting it as the SAME as the King James, but rather as an alternative to it.
Otherwise, it's just fraud. Which of course it is, anyway. Remember, Progressives are the Party of the Criminal and Dishonest.
so what's fraudulent about it? or is this you once again ascribing characteristics that you are not able to back up
what you're about is lying.
Who's inflamed?
- Nov 3, 2012
- 37,635
- 4,526
- 1,170
- Nov 3, 2012
- 37,635
- 4,526
- 1,170
@OldSchool
It is written:
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Rev. 22:18,19
And again it is written:
Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.
Proverbs 30:6
In that verse of Proverbs - we see that it is a sin to add to the Word of God and those who do it (including those who "change the Word of God into a lie") will be corrected by God (reproved) and they will be exposed as a liar.
That is the Word of God on the matter of this subject and that is the only Word that matters!
It is written:
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Rev. 22:18,19
And again it is written:
Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.
Proverbs 30:6
In that verse of Proverbs - we see that it is a sin to add to the Word of God and those who do it (including those who "change the Word of God into a lie") will be corrected by God (reproved) and they will be exposed as a liar.
That is the Word of God on the matter of this subject and that is the only Word that matters!
Last edited:
TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #32
The OP has besmirched the King James Bible!!!
aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,687
- 280
Was king/queen James a Tranny?
Just the run of the mill homosexual who killed his lovers when he was done with them
Similar threads
- Replies
- 257
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 196
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 102
- Replies
- 50
- Views
- 528
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 70
- Replies
- 249
- Views
- 1K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-