Quite the argument you've invented there.The typical liberal style of alleged argumentation goes like this.
LIBERAL’s OP: I maintain that X is true because A, B & C.
Conservative reply: A is false. So is C. And even if A, B & C were all true, X does not logically follow from those premises.
LIBERAL: X is true because A, B & C.
Conservative reply: but you already said that and now you aren’t supporting A or C. And worse, you can’t show how X logically follows even if your premises were all true.
LIBERAL: you fucking cons and MAGAts refuse to learn. I already addressed that when I said, “X is true because A, B & C.”
Conservative reply: But your premises aren’t true, you have not defended them at all, merely repeating yourself isn’t an argument and you can’t even defend your own syllogism.
LIBERAL: “X is true because A, B & C.”
At which point some liberal mod bans “Conservative.” Why? I dunno. Ask “?”
The actual interchange is more like this:
Conservative: The election was stolen.
Liberal: Prove it
Conservative: We have affidavits
Liberal: Affidavits are testimony; nothing else. They prove nothing.
Conservative: Yes they do.
Liberal: No they don't.
This is the same pattern for nearly every subject.