Zone1 Proposed Rule

[BackAgain]

Proposed Board Rule.

I don’t even care too much for most of the rules. Once you’ve made a point (or, for our liberals, something that is supposed to be a “point,”) you are no longer allowed to merely repeat that same line of argument again.

Obviously, for most of our liberals, this would amount to a muzzle. So, good news all around!

 

[mamooth]

Proposed Board Rule.

I don’t even care too much for most of the rules. Once you’ve made a point (or, for our liberals, something that is supposed to be a “point,”) you are no longer allowed to merely repeat that same line of argument again.

Obviously, for most of our liberals, this would amount to a muzzle. So, good news all around!

Got it. You post dumb propaganda, liberals refute it over and over, so you want the liberals censored.

And yes, it is very obvious that censorship is you goal. You stated it outright.

Needless to say, you don't see any liberals advocating for censorship. That's because first, we're into free speech, and second, we know we can take apart any bad conservative talking points.

 

[1srelluc]

Proposed Board Rule.

I don’t even care too much for most of the rules. Once you’ve made a point (or, for our liberals, something that is supposed to be a “point,”) you are no longer allowed to merely repeat that same line of argument again.

Obviously, for most of our liberals, this would amount to a muzzle. So, good news all around!

 

[mudwhistle]

Got it. You post dumb propaganda, liberals refute it over and over, so you want the liberals censored.

And yes, it is very obvious that censorship is you goal. You stated it outright.

Needless to say, you don't see any liberals advocating for censorship. That's because first, we're into free speech, and second, we know we can take apart any bad conservative talking points.

I see liberals advocating for censorship here every day.

You don't believe in free speech.
You only believe in everyone thinking the same way.
Anyone caught repeating "bad conservative talking points" in their threads are sent to the "Conspiracy Theory" or "Rubber Room".
And anyone pointing out leftist supporters are threatened with banning.

 

[candycorn]

oh good lord.

 

[BULLDOG]

I see liberals advocating for censorship here every day.

You don't believe in free speech.
You only believe in everyone thinking the same way.
Anyone caught repeating "bad conservative talking points" in their threads are sent to the "Conspiracy Theory" or "Rubber Room".
And anyone pointing out leftist supporters are threatened with banning.

Conservative talking points are conspiracy theories. I miss the old days before right wingers lost their minds.

 

[BackAgain]

Got it. You post dumb propaganda, liberals refute it over and over, so you want the liberals censored.

And yes, it is very obvious that censorship is you goal. You stated it outright.

Needless to say, you don't see any liberals advocating for censorship. That's because first, we're into free speech, and second, we know we can take apart any bad conservative talking points.

Nah. I don’t want anyone censored. I’m not a modern American lib. We leave censorship demands to you and your filthy ilk.

Also, once again, when you read something, it is usually best if you comprehend it before yapping like the little ***** you are.

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 805295

One is not required to agree with me. But if you wanna disagree, a bit of humor goes a long way.

 

[mamooth]

I see liberals advocating for censorship here every day.

If you don't like being humiliated, stop saying such crazy things.

Anyone caught repeating "bad conservative talking points" in their threads are sent to the "Conspiracy Theory" or "Rubber Room".

And you are free to babble your conspiracy theories there. Isn't free speech awesome?

Oh, how it works more often is that a leftie posts an intelligent thread, it gets swarmed by rightie trolls babbling nonsense and trashing the thread, and that gets it moved to the rubber room.

And anyone pointing out leftist supporters are threatened with banning.

Um, sure.

 

[BackAgain]

The typical liberal style of alleged argumentation goes like this.

LIBERAL’s OP: I maintain that X is true because A, B & C.

Conservative reply: A is false. So is C. And even if A, B & C were all true, X does not logically follow from those premises.

LIBERAL: X is true because A, B & C.

Conservative reply: but you already said that and now you aren’t supporting A or C. And worse, you can’t show how X logically follows even if your premises were all true.

LIBERAL: you ******* cons and MAGAts refuse to learn. I already addressed that when I said, “X is true because A, B & C.”

Conservative reply: But your premises aren’t true, you have not defended them at all, merely repeating yourself isn’t an argument and you can’t even defend your own syllogism.

LIBERAL: “X is true because A, B & C.”

At which point some liberal mod bans “Conservative.” Why? I dunno. Ask “?”

 

[Concerned American]

Conservative talking points are conspiracy theories. I miss the old days before right wingers lost their minds.

As opposed to the democrats who never had one to lose, eh?

 

[ChristisKing]

Proposed Board Rule.

I don’t even care too much for most of the rules. Once you’ve made a point (or, for our liberals, something that is supposed to be a “point,”) you are no longer allowed to merely repeat that same line of argument again.

OR if you don't have a point and can't answer a freaking question and instead avoid the thread altogether by changing the subject completely and derailing the thread to just put a lid on it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

All we really need here are sensible IQ standards and a crackdown on sock puppets.

 

[Natural Citizen]

oh good lord.

We should have an annual Dave Award presentation; usership to nominate candidates and ultimately vote for the Dave Champion.

And then they have to have a banner as their avy recognizing the milestone until the new Dave is crowned.

BackAgain already has this year in the bag, no doubt about it. And, golly, we're only half way through the year.

 

[ChristisKing]

All we really need here are sensible IQ

Yeah, that just adds onto what I was saying. There are members on here who couldn't answer a single question if their lives depended on it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Don't give these clowns anymore bright ideas on rules.

It's difficult to keep up now

 

[mamooth]

The typical liberal style of alleged argumentation goes like this.

You've got it exactly reversed. Conservatives regurgitate bad talking points, liberals use logic, conservatives ignore the logic and regurgitate again.

Seriously, stop projecting.

If you're not projecting, surely you can provide examples of those dastardly liberals doing what you claim. Do so here.

<crickets>

In contrast, I can show many examples of conservatives avoiding logic. Look at any thread regarding the evidence against Trump, or any thread on global warming, as just a few examples.

 

[ChristisKing]

Seriously, stop projecting.

Fine,... Looks like it's busted anyways as I'm not getting anything.

 

[BackAgain]

You've got it exactly reversed. Conservatives regurgitate bad talking points, liberals use logic, conservatives ignore the logic and regurgitate again.

Seriously, stop projecting.

If you're not projecting, surely you can provide examples of those dastardly liberals doing what you claim. Do so here.

<crickets>

In contrast, I can show many examples of conservatives avoiding logic. Look at any thread regarding the evidence against Trump, or any thread on global warming, as just a few examples.

Nope. I got it exactly right and the truth hurts, so you’re now just lashing out. Ineffectually as usual.

 

[mudwhistle]

Conservative talking points are conspiracy theories. I miss the old days before right wingers lost their minds.

Conservative talking points are the truth.
You can't handle the truth....so you try to have them banned.