Pretti Shooting my opinion as a member of US Lawfare

Your question doesnt relate to the statement. Legal guns stop over 500000 violent crimes in any year. If you ever have to protect your family or yourself from a violent criminal try begging. Then let us know how that worked out
It does relate. Throughout the forum on gun matters, many say they have a gun because the criminals have guns. So by that logic, a mailbox criminal carries a gun.
 
It does relate. Throughout the forum on gun matters, many say they have a gun because the criminals have guns. So by that logic, a mailbox criminal carries a gun.
I see you never got farther than hs if that. There is no logic on your rather crude analogy. Lets add context.
A criminal illegal alien is stealing from your mailbox. You go out with your legal gun concealed. The criminal pulls out his gun and points it at you.,or he threatens you with a knife.
We now have a stand your ground situation and use of deadly force is legal moral and required.
See how context works. Its noit about the mailbox its about stopping serious bodily injury or death
 
I see you never got farther than hs if that. There is no logic on your rather crude analogy. Lets add context.
A criminal illegal alien is stealing from your mailbox. You go out with your legal gun concealed. The criminal pulls out his gun and points it at you.,or he threatens you with a knife.
We now have a stand your ground situation and use of deadly force is legal moral and required.
See how context works. Its noit about the mailbox its about stopping serious bodily injury or death
You are going off at a tangent on the matter.

Gun nuts claim, all the criminals have guns. So again, by that logic, the guy/woman that vandalised a mailbox, prosecuted, and obtained a criminal record is a gun carrier.
 
You are going off at a tangent on the matter.

Gun nuts claim, all the criminals have guns. So again, by that logic, the guy/woman that vandalised a mailbox, prosecuted, and obtained a criminal record is a gun carrier.
THats called false premise therefore your logic is flawed. Didnt you study philosophy in graduate school.
Heres a simpler exaple even you can understand
Every time we see a tree we see birds. Therefore trees cause birds.
Dont take this personally but your just plain stupid
 
Damaging, destroying, or defacing a mailbox is a federal crime in the United States, as mailboxes are considered federal property under 18 U.S.C. § 1705. Violators can face severe penalties, including fines of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to three years for each act of vandalism.

So why does this criminal make you feel you need a gun?

I probably don’t need a gun for the mailbox basher, but then again, that is not why I have them.
 
THats called false premise therefore your logic is flawed. Didnt you study philosophy in graduate school.
Heres a simpler exaple even you can understand
Every time we see a tree we see birds. Therefore trees cause birds.
Dont take this personally but your just plain stupid
So, you've hit the nail on the head, when a gun nut says, "The criminals have guns", that's a false premise. But, most knew that.
 
I probably don’t need a gun for the mailbox basher, but then again, that is not why I have them.
The odds are, you are more likely to be struck by lightning than being shot. So what's the reason why you carry/own a gun? Sport, vermin control?

Lightning is a bigger threat, how have you prepared for that?
 
The odds are, you are more likely to be struck by lightning than being shot. So what's the reason why you carry/own a gun? Sport, vermin control?

Lightning is a bigger threat, how have you prepared for that?
They carry a gun because it feeds their fantasy of…..I am a badass
 
So, you've hit the nail on the head, when a gun nut says, "The criminals have guns", that's a false premise. But, most knew that.

Expanding the analogy, guns don’t make people criminals any more than birds make trees, but we can all agree that birds sit in trees and most of us sane people agree that criminals have guns and won’t just turn them if they were made illegal.
 
They carry a gun because it feeds their fantasy of…..I am a badass

And you carry a big stick with a nail in it for what reason?

A gun is a great equalizer. A petite woman with a gun quickly subdues Rambo with a big stick with a nail in it. Life isn’t like the movies.
 
They carry a gun because it feeds their fantasy of…..I am a badass
In many areas, fear and perception of something outweighs the facts, evidence, and statistics. So people over perceive and over react.

In the UK, we have guns. As kids we had air rifles and air pistols. Normally .22. then as teens, shotguns. In nearly 60 years, never had anyone shoot a firearm in my direction. According to American gun nuts, I should arm up because criminals have guns.

It's easier to drill through a 32 feet concrete wall containing rebar than get through the skull of a gun nut.
 
Domestic Terrorist
Based on your logic shooting someone because you them to be a domestic terrorist is justified. What court of law or other legal body deemed Ashley Babbitt a domestic terrorist?
 
Based on your logic shooting someone because you them to be a domestic terrorist is justified. What court of law or other legal body deemed Ashley Babbitt a domestic terrorist?
The fact that she was leading an angry mob
 
The fact that she was leading an angry mob
She was not leading, was not armed, and posed no imminent threat to anyone. She was shot by an incompetent cop who is now indicted for fraud.
 
15th post
She was not leading, was not armed, and posed no imminent threat to anyone. She was shot by an incompetent cop who is now indicted for fraud.

An angry mob that had injured 140 police officers was breaching the last barrier to accessing members of Congress

Babbit was the first through so was leading the mob
 
In the UK, we have guns. As kids we had air rifles and air pistols. Normally .22. then as teens, shotguns. In nearly 60 years, never had anyone shoot a firearm in my direction. According to American gun nuts, I should arm up because criminals have guns.

I am from the South. Growing up, kids had shotguns on gun racks of their trucks. Nobody got shot. It is certainly a societal change. I don’t deny that. I would blame the degradation of society on the progressive movement, but I digress.

It is undeniable that criminals in the US have guns and lots of them. Making guns illegal doesn’t make them go away. If guns were made illegal, only law abiding citizens would turn them in. Criminals, by definition, break the law.

Also, the intent of our 2nd Amendment is also to protect us from government tyranny. Granted, this has become much more difficult to do with the advanced weaponry of the military, but there is strength in numbers and always will be.
 
An angry mob that had injured 140 police officers was breaching the last barrier to accessing members of Congress

Babbit was the first through so was leading the mob
Let me help you understand use of deadly force law.
A reasonable person must believe serious bodily injury or death is immanent. That means going to happen fight now this second. That test wasnt met as she was unarmed and far away not even aware of the cop who shot her. No other cop saw her as a threat they didnt fire. She was not the first through I saw the video and there is no fist through standard. The cop had a history of gun problems and is now indicted for fraud.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom