LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 29,159
- 19,954
- 1,405
Whistles, no. Cars, yes.Yea, those whistles are a threat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whistles, no. Cars, yes.Yea, those whistles are a threat
Loud sounds are a well-known form of tortureYea, those whistles are a threat
I knowLoud sounds are a well-known form of torture
The lib wackos are not blowing those whistles for no resson
They are a form of obstruction
Try doing your job with several people blowing whistles into your ear.I know
Shoot the *****
I can see how that would make you want to kill someoneTry doing your job with several people blowing whistles into your ear.
Then get back to us.
It just might cause somebody to be highly angered.I can see how that would make you want to kill someone
We can’t have angry ICE agentsIt just might cause somebody to be highly angered.
See, the problem with you leftists is that you have no common sense.
None.
Then tell your little commie goon squads to go have some hot chocolate and smoke some weed or something.We can’t have angry ICE agents
We have no idea who they might kill
You were not interested in stopping the spread as much as you were more interested in fascist control. Plus, your science proved to be bullshit and futile.
No but the 100s around two ladies with a car trying to obstruct law enforcement and heeding police commands is a mob. Same with a guy chasing after law enforcement vehicles kicking their tail lights out.
Don’t obstruct law enforcement and you won’t get shot. Simple.
I think this makes sense, but am wondering what will be said about the fact that the police probably couldn't hear one another because of the whistles and racket.
ICE are law enforcement officers, aka copsThere were no police there. Just ICE goons.
Liar.Actually, the science was perfectly fine.
Your reaction to it was not. Wearing a mask was an insult to the Führer, and you couldn't have that.
Hundreds of people? really. I Only saw maybe a few people on the street in that video.
Same with the Pretti shooting. He wasn't kicking out a tail light when he was shot, he was helping a woman up who had been punched by an ICE Nazi.
I understand that people want to see them exonerated. But, I'll let the inquiries handle the process.He was not an imminent threat after he was disarmed. One must be an imminent threat to allow use of deadly force. He didnt have a gun when shot. Thats the issue
You mean her illegal neighbors.Sue would have sat by and let the Gestapo round up her neighbors.
you have yet to provide science.Actually, the science was perfectly fine.
Your reaction to it was not. Wearing a mask was an insult to the Führer, and you couldn't have that.
Provide the science (empirical data) where the woman was doing nothing and then assaulted for no reason.Hundreds of people? really. I Only saw maybe a few people on the street in that video.
Same with the Pretti shooting. He wasn't kicking out a tail light when he was shot, he was helping a woman up who had been punched by an ICE Nazi.
You mean her illegal neighbors.
Please stop ascribing behavior to others. You don't look smart as it is.
you have yet to provide science.
Provide the science (empirical data) where the woman was doing nothing and then assaulted for no reason.
Somehow, you are just refusing to acknowledge empirical data component necessary to support science. This is not magic, or religion, or a belief system. Hypothesis are great but they must be tested and validated against evidence and not just relied upon by authority.Did you just discover 'science" was a magic word? It doesn't work like that.
Big words don't make you smart.Somehow, you are just refusing to acknowledge empirical data component necessary to support science. This is not magic, or religion, or a belief system. Hypothesis are great but they must be tested and validated against evidence and not just relied upon by authority.