Pretti Shooting my opinion as a member of US Lawfare

Try doing your job with several people blowing whistles into your ear.
Then get back to us.
I can see how that would make you want to kill someone
 
It just might cause somebody to be highly angered.
See, the problem with you leftists is that you have no common sense.
None.
We can’t have angry ICE agents
We have no idea who they might kill
 
You were not interested in stopping the spread as much as you were more interested in fascist control. Plus, your science proved to be bullshit and futile.

Actually, the science was perfectly fine.

Your reaction to it was not. Wearing a mask was an insult to the Führer, and you couldn't have that.

No but the 100s around two ladies with a car trying to obstruct law enforcement and heeding police commands is a mob. Same with a guy chasing after law enforcement vehicles kicking their tail lights out.

Don’t obstruct law enforcement and you won’t get shot. Simple.

Hundreds of people? really. I Only saw maybe a few people on the street in that video.

Same with the Pretti shooting. He wasn't kicking out a tail light when he was shot, he was helping a woman up who had been punched by an ICE Nazi.
 
I think this makes sense, but am wondering what will be said about the fact that the police probably couldn't hear one another because of the whistles and racket.

There were no police there. Just ICE goons.
 
Actually, the science was perfectly fine.

Your reaction to it was not. Wearing a mask was an insult to the Führer, and you couldn't have that.



Hundreds of people? really. I Only saw maybe a few people on the street in that video.

Same with the Pretti shooting. He wasn't kicking out a tail light when he was shot, he was helping a woman up who had been punched by an ICE Nazi.
Liar.
 
He was not an imminent threat after he was disarmed. One must be an imminent threat to allow use of deadly force. He didnt have a gun when shot. Thats the issue
I understand that people want to see them exonerated. But, I'll let the inquiries handle the process.

Has there been any report from the officers themselves as to why they fired?
 
Sue would have sat by and let the Gestapo round up her neighbors.
You mean her illegal neighbors.

Please stop ascribing behavior to others. You don't look smart as it is.
 
Actually, the science was perfectly fine.

Your reaction to it was not. Wearing a mask was an insult to the Führer, and you couldn't have that.
you have yet to provide science.
Hundreds of people? really. I Only saw maybe a few people on the street in that video.

Same with the Pretti shooting. He wasn't kicking out a tail light when he was shot, he was helping a woman up who had been punched by an ICE Nazi.
Provide the science (empirical data) where the woman was doing nothing and then assaulted for no reason.
 
15th post
You mean her illegal neighbors.

Please stop ascribing behavior to others. You don't look smart as it is.

Oh, so it's okay if you round people up if you declare them illegal?

Germany had something called the "Nuremberg Laws, " which stripped Jews of all their rights.

So this notion that an attrocity becomes "okay" when you have a law backing it up is kind of awful.
 
Did you just discover 'science" was a magic word? It doesn't work like that.
Somehow, you are just refusing to acknowledge empirical data component necessary to support science. This is not magic, or religion, or a belief system. Hypothesis are great but they must be tested and validated against evidence and not just relied upon by authority.
 
Somehow, you are just refusing to acknowledge empirical data component necessary to support science. This is not magic, or religion, or a belief system. Hypothesis are great but they must be tested and validated against evidence and not just relied upon by authority.
Big words don't make you smart.

we all saw ICE and CBP shoot Good and Pretti in cold blood.

That's all the "evidence" I need.

Just remember, there's no statute of limitations on murder.
 
Back
Top Bottom