Pretti Shooting my opinion as a member of US Lawfare

[WorldWatcher]

The decibel level of a whistle and hearing damage is germane to the topic at hand.

How is it a deflection?

You could easily demonstrate that a whistle is below the threshold for hearing damage....but of course you cant.

Now that's deflection.

Because the unarmed victim that was shot in the back 10 time had a camera not a whistle.

That is the grass topic.

WW

 

[MayorQuimby]

You can laugh all you want, but if it disrupts important communication they need, it can be dangerous. Not to mention the fact that no one has the right to get up into an officer's face and scream, spit, or blow whistles.

I mean, technically I agree that blowing a whistle is not assault, however, I know for a fact that some people can do it in a way that shows they have aggression towards the person they are blowing it at. I really don't know the law on this, whether the agent would be justified in doing something if he felt "the way he blew his whistle at me was hostile". I don't know, the whole thing is just messed up AF.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Because the unarmed victim that was shot in the back 10 time had a camera not a whistle.

That is the grass topic.

WW

The women he was interfering on the behalf of were

 

[WorldWatcher]

The women he was interfering on the behalf of were

Because someone else is blowing a whistle is not justification for v shooting someone that has disarmed in the back.

Wwy

 

[OODA_Loop]

Because someone else is blowing a whistle is not justification for v shooting someone that has disarmed in the back.

Wwy

Being in a scrum with LE with a hidden gun is. The obstruction of LE and the whistleblowers was the impetus of the fight.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Being in a scrum with LE with a hidden gun is. The obstruction of LE and the whistleblowers was the impetus of the fight.

Sorry someone else blowing a whistle is not justification for shooting someone in the back that has been disarmed and being pinned by 4-5 officers.

WW

 

[OODA_Loop]

Sorry someone else blowing a whistle is not justification for shooting someone in the back that has been disarmed and being pinned by 4-5 officers.

WW

The justification was the hidden gun and violent fight with LE not the whistle. The whistle was the instigation.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The justification was the hidden gun and violent fight with LE not the whistle. The whistle was the instigation.

He was licensed for CC.

The firearm was removed by an officer.

He was shot in the back by an officer that watched the officer in the gray coat leave the scrum with the firearm.

The whistle has no relevance to shooting San unattended man in the back.

WW

 

[MayorQuimby]

He was licensed for CC.

The firearm was removed by an officer.

He was shot in the back by an officer that watched the officer in the gray coat leave the scrum with the firearm.

The whistle has no relevance to shooting San unattended man in the back.

WW

If he had one gun, even though it was taken away, he could still have another gun, and this would make him still a threat. I think this is OODA's point.

 

[rightwinger]

And he could have stayed home or gone to work. **** him.

Or he could protest a government invasion of his city

The eyes of Minneapolis are upon ICE
What we are seeing is not pretty

 

[WorldWatcher]

If he had one gun, even though it was taken away, he could still have another gun, and this would make him still a threat. I think this is OODA's point.

OODA's point is to stretch anything to justify shooting an unarmed man in the back who had been blinded by OC spray multiple times to the face, in pain, in the back and that was being restrained by 4-5 officers face down and on his belly/knees.

I mean really, a different person blew a whistle? LOL

WW

 

[Seymour Flops]

Dude I worked on a flight deck.

No one lost their hearing because someone was blowing a whistle that day.

WW

You worked on a flight deck with no hearing protection?

I say, I say, YOU WORKED ON A FLIGHT DECK WITH NO HEARING PROTECTION?

 

[WorldWatcher]

You worked on a flight deck with no hearing protection?

I say, I say, YOU WORKED ON A FLIGHT DECK WITH NO HEARING PROTECTION?

Yes, at times. When not in flight ops. As a matter of fact walking up to the bow and sitting down as the ship plowed through the seas on a stary night could be quite peaceful.

Yes with hearing protection during flight ops.

WW

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yes, at times. When not in flight ops. As a matter of fact walking up to the bow and sitting down as the ship plowed through the seas on a stary night could be quite peaceful.

Yes with hearing protection during flight ops.

WW

Whew! Had me worried there.

Sure, that's the way they did it in "Top Gun."

I thought you were drawing some analogy to police, who of course, do not wear those large bulky noise-cancelling headphones. It was just a random memory? Good! Part of the perques of having served. I'll start throwing them into my posts, as well.

 

[San Souci]

Or he could protest a government invasion of his city

The eyes of Minneapolis are upon ICE
What we are seeing is not pretty

Getting rid of dirty ,3rd world Illegals is NOT an invasion--These filthy Illegals coming here WAS a Foreign invasion

 

[rightwinger]

Getting rid of dirty ,3rd world Illegals is NOT an invasion--These filthy Illegals coming here WAS a Foreign invasion

Invading a city with 3000 Storm Troopers is

 

[San Souci]

Invading a city with 3000 Storm Troopers is

Nope-- They are there to ENFORCE the LAW--Your filthy Commie side let in all there dirty Freeloading 3rd world paupers. Time to RID ourselves of them

 

[Captain Caveman]

I feel much safer that I have guns because I recognize the fact that criminals exist.

Damaging, destroying, or defacing a mailbox is a federal crime in the United States, as mailboxes are considered federal property under 18 U.S.C. § 1705. Violators can face severe penalties, including fines of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to three years for each act of vandalism.

So why does this criminal make you feel you need a gun?

 

[Hafar1014]

Damaging, destroying, or defacing a mailbox is a federal crime in the United States, as mailboxes are considered federal property under 18 U.S.C. § 1705. Violators can face severe penalties, including fines of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to three years for each act of vandalism.

So why does this criminal make you feel you need a gun?

Your question doesnt relate to the statement. Legal guns stop over 500000 violent crimes in any year. If you ever have to protect your family or yourself from a violent criminal try begging. Then let us know how that worked out

 

[rightwinger]

Your question doesnt relate to the statement. Legal guns stop over 500000 violent crimes in any year. If you ever have to protect your family or yourself from a violent criminal try begging. Then let us know how that worked out

I have a big stick with a nail in it
Nobody messes with me

Think of all the crimes it has stopped