President Trump to order colleges to respect free speech or lose funding!

[22lcidw]

Trump to order colleges to back free speech or lose funding

Let see.

Leftists will scream and throw fits,along with them colleges will probably file suits against him for trying to insure freedom of speech for ALL students and staff,SC will uphold the executive order.

Does that mean they get to teach magical creation?

If another side and it may not be Repubs take machine guns and rifles and warns repeadetly over a period of time and then shoots people doing this, will they continue? I bet not.

 

[denmark]

You want your government (Trump) to pay for security to have all those non-student conservatives speak on the famous free-speech UC Berkeley campus?
If not, then you are ok with those Antifa aholes beating up those speakers?
Make up your mind.
Show us how Berkeley is preventing free speech ...

If the university would simply arrest a few of these miscreants, the rest would fade into the woodwork. The university encourages them by letting them get away with these crimes. Providing a safe environment on campus is the university's job. It's not supposed to be a free for all where only those who can pay for it are safe from assault.

With limited public funding, the university’s police is trying to do its job. Those non-student political extremists are stretching the univerdity resources, which are already over budget.

Do you agree that Trump’s executive order should include additional funding to volleges for security?

No, the police are not trying to do their job. Numerous campus police have admitted they were told not to arrest protestors. The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration. You're spewing university propaganda.

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

 

[bripat9643]

If the university would simply arrest a few of these miscreants, the rest would fade into the woodwork. The university encourages them by letting them get away with these crimes. Providing a safe environment on campus is the university's job. It's not supposed to be a free for all where only those who can pay for it are safe from assault.

With limited public funding, the university’s police is trying to do its job. Those non-student political extremists are stretching the univerdity resources, which are already over budget.

Do you agree that Trump’s executive order should include additional funding to volleges for security?

No, the police are not trying to do their job. Numerous campus police have admitted they were told not to arrest protestors. The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration. You're spewing university propaganda.

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

 

[ph3iron]

Trump to order colleges to back free speech or lose funding

Let see.

Leftists will scream and throw fits,along with them colleges will probably file suits against him for trying to insure freedom of speech for ALL students and staff,SC will uphold the executive order.

So why won't the overweight blob release his grades (and taxes)

 

[ph3iron]

With limited public funding, the university’s police is trying to do its job. Those non-student political extremists are stretching the univerdity resources, which are already over budget.

Do you agree that Trump’s executive order should include additional funding to volleges for security?

No, the police are not trying to do their job. Numerous campus police have admitted they were told not to arrest protestors. The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration. You're spewing university propaganda.

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Takes one to know one.
Baby pic?? Mmm

 

[ph3iron]

Trump to order colleges to back free speech or lose funding

Let see.

Leftists will scream and throw fits,along with them colleges will probably file suits against him for trying to insure freedom of speech for ALL students and staff,SC will uphold the executive order.

I’m so old I remember when universities promoted free thinking. Now it takes Trump to set them straight.

Here’s What Trump’s Executive Order on Free Speech Says

It takes energy to think freely. Socialism and communism is for the reprobates, depraved, and ignorant folks who can't think straight.

Hope you are returning your commie SS and Medicare.
You are SO principled

 

[denmark]

With limited public funding, the university’s police is trying to do its job. Those non-student political extremists are stretching the univerdity resources, which are already over budget.

Do you agree that Trump’s executive order should include additional funding to volleges for security?

No, the police are not trying to do their job. Numerous campus police have admitted they were told not to arrest protestors. The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration. You're spewing university propaganda.

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

No, the police are not trying to do their job. Numerous campus police have admitted they were told not to arrest protestors. The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration. You're spewing university propaganda.

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

 

[denmark]

You are the one “spewing ... propaganda”.
If not, then cite evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Makes no sense; not in the university’s interest, but ignorant & biased people don’t realize that.

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

You don’t understand the phrase “deliberately engineered the violence”?
You did not provide that evidence.
Twisting the facts is not evidence.

 

[bripat9643]

Chapel Hill police told 'Do not engage' with Silent Sam protesters before statue fell​

Police Defend Lack of Intervention in Violent Protest at UC Berkeley

There has been much criticism surrounding the decision by campus police at the University of California, Berkeley not to intervene in the violent protests that successfully shut down a scheduled speech by right-wing gay provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos. While eyewitnesses contend that the lack of police intervention allowed the protests to escalate, police are defending the decision to allow the protests to progress, stating that they believed officer intervention would only have served to inflame tensions.

As protesters broke windows, assaulted Trump and Yiannopoulos supporters, set a large fire outside of the building where Yiannopoulos was supposed to speak, and even hurled rocks at police officers, the campus police decided to employ a hands-off approach, though there were only about 150 protesters. Approximately $100,000 worth of damage was done, but only one person was arrested.

One eyewitness, UFC veteran and professional MMA fighter Jake Shields, told Breitbart News that he was present at the event and was compelled to rescue a man who was being attacked by the protesters after police allegedly refused to intervene. “Like fifteen people were trying to attack him and others were cheering them on,” explained Shields. “No one helped, no one had the balls to step in, so my reaction was to run in and start picking people off.”​

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

You don’t understand the phrase “deliberately engineered the violence”?
You did not provide that evidence.
Twisting the facts is not evidence.

Deliberate refusing to arrest the perpetrators is “deliberately engineering the violence,” dumbass.

 

[denmark]

FAIL!
I’ll respond to the UCB event I am familiar with. At first, I was also puzzled by the lack of police activity, but later learned the campus police were not prepared for the violence by non-student Antifa perps.
Your reference also indicated:
Dan Mogul, assistant vice chancellor and spokesman for the UC Berkeley, said that administrators at Berkeley intend to protect First Amendment rights, but may need to more closely examine certain events if they have the potential for disruption and damage on campus. “It’s not about limiting free speech,” he added, but about the security of the campus.”

Will Trump increasing funding to universities to host these events requiring more security?

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

You don’t understand the phrase “deliberately engineered the violence”?
You did not provide that evidence.
Twisting the facts is not evidence.

Deliberate refusing to arrest the perpetrators is “deliberately engineering the violence,” dumbass.

It takes a “dumbass” to use the word “engineering” without understanding its meaning.
Engineering involves designing or at least planning an outcome.
You have absolutely no evidence for that in the UCB case.

 

[bripat9643]

That's spin from a police force that refused to enforce the law and allowed Chaos to ensue. Only morons are fooled by it.

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

You don’t understand the phrase “deliberately engineered the violence”?
You did not provide that evidence.
Twisting the facts is not evidence.

Deliberate refusing to arrest the perpetrators is “deliberately engineering the violence,” dumbass.

It takes a “dumbass” to use the word “engineering” without understanding its meaning.
Engineering involves designing or at least planning an outcome.
You have absolutely no evidence for that in the UCB case.

Exactly. They planned for a riot to commence. They wanted to permanently scare off any further conservative speakers.

 

[Toro]

University administrations aren't "deliberately engineering violence."

But many are doing a horrible job of protecting free speech, particularly for conservatives.

Many universities have abandoned the pursuit of truth for craven political expediency.

 

[bripat9643]

University administrations aren't "deliberately engineering violence."

But many are doing a horrible job of protecting free speech, particularly for conservatives.

Many universities have abandoned the pursuit of truth for craven political expediency.

ROFL! They made it clear they don't care about the free speech of conservatives. They deliberately turned a blind eye to violence against conservatives. You're parroting university spin.

 

[denmark]

Therefore, you have no evidence that
“The violence is deliberately engineered by the university administration.“

Also, you refuse to allow extra funding for campuses to host non-academic non-student speakers that require more security.
UCB spent more than $1 million to host and secure that conservative gay moron in subsequent campus appearance later that year.

Looks like you are the “moron” fooled by conservative press and Trump.

If they would have enforced the law the first time he appeared on campus, they wouldn't have encouraged further criminality. The fact that Berkeley is a haven for leftwing criminals is not the fault of conservative speakers. It's the fault of leftwing academics who encourage this behavior. If it costs them money, then they are getting what they deserve.

I posted the evidence that the university deliberately engineered the violence. I can't force you to accept facts.

You don’t understand the phrase “deliberately engineered the violence”?
You did not provide that evidence.
Twisting the facts is not evidence.

Deliberate refusing to arrest the perpetrators is “deliberately engineering the violence,” dumbass.

It takes a “dumbass” to use the word “engineering” without understanding its meaning.
Engineering involves designing or at least planning an outcome.
You have absolutely no evidence for that in the UCB case.

Exactly. They planned for a riot to commence. They wanted to permanently scare off any further conservative speakers.

As I thought. You have no evidence, only your belief based on what you prefer to think.

If they wanted to scare off future conservative speakers, then why did they invite them later for “Free Speech Week” and waste valuable money that students could better benefit from?
Here’s a clip:

For months, the University of California, Berkeley, had prepared for a slate of conservative speakers to arrive on campus for “Free Speech Week.” The school was ready to spend more than a million dollars on security amid concerns that protesters from both left and right would show up and become violent during the four-day event planned for late September. In the end, almost all the speeches were canceled due to logistical issues and safety concerns. And the one appearance that went on Sunday ended without a clear indication of what had been accomplished.

“Having the university become a political battleground sometimes makes it seem like the place is uninhabitable for students.”

Milo Yiannopoulos Finally Spoke at Berkeley. But the Protesters Were Louder

 

[busybee01]

How about the Left being more tolerant instead of holding everyone being tolerant to them.

The left is far more tolerant than the right . When does the right ever accept people who don’t follow their beliefs ?

When was the last time you saw the Right throw eggs at Clinton supporters or smash windows and light fires at one of Obama’s Inaugrations?

The right only does minor things like mailing pipe bombs or planning mass slaughters. No one has to tolerate draconian points of view.

When was the last time a Donald Trump supporter planned a mass slaughter and carried out a mass shooting of exposed Democrat Congressmen playing baseball on an open field?

The Left is NOT tolerant.

The fact is that more people have died from right wing violence going all the way back to Oklahoma City. Have we forgotten the member of the Coast Guard who was planning on murdering Trump critics in the Democrat Party and media. The right is not tolerant.

 

[busybee01]

This will be overturned by the courts. The Congress has to authorize a President to withhold funds. A President does not get to make that determination. Also it is so vague as what constitutes free speech. Could Notre Dame be forced to accept devil worshippers? Could a university be forced to host a white supremacist?

 

[JBond]

Trump to order colleges to back free speech or lose funding

Let see.

Leftists will scream and throw fits,along with them colleges will probably file suits against him for trying to insure freedom of speech for ALL students and staff,SC will uphold the executive order.

I can’t wait for Liberty University to allow the Satanist and Wiccans free space on their campus!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So you admit Universities agenda is to foster and promote Leftism.

Golf gator is ok. The conversations and brain washing starts far earlier. Horrible parents.

 

[LeftofLeft]

How about the Left being more tolerant instead of holding everyone being tolerant to them.

The left is far more tolerant than the right . When does the right ever accept people who don’t follow their beliefs ?

When was the last time you saw the Right throw eggs at Clinton supporters or smash windows and light fires at one of Obama’s Inaugrations?

The right only does minor things like mailing pipe bombs or planning mass slaughters. No one has to tolerate draconian points of view.

When was the last time a Donald Trump supporter planned a mass slaughter and carried out a mass shooting of exposed Democrat Congressmen playing baseball on an open field?

The Left is NOT tolerant.

The fact is that more people have died from right wing violence going all the way back to Oklahoma City. Have we forgotten the member of the Coast Guard who was planning on murdering Trump critics in the Democrat Party and media. The right is not tolerant.

That is not the argument. The argument is that while the Left bills itself as the tolerance police within its own ranks some of the most intolerant acts of hate are taking place over discourse. Point being... the Left needs to either stop wagging its finger about tolerance or stop shooting up exposed Republican Congressmen in an open field??

 

[IM2]

The left is far more tolerant than the right . When does the right ever accept people who don’t follow their beliefs ?

When was the last time you saw the Right throw eggs at Clinton supporters or smash windows and light fires at one of Obama’s Inaugrations?

The right only does minor things like mailing pipe bombs or planning mass slaughters. No one has to tolerate draconian points of view.

When was the last time a Donald Trump supporter planned a mass slaughter and carried out a mass shooting of exposed Democrat Congressmen playing baseball on an open field?

The Left is NOT tolerant.

The fact is that more people have died from right wing violence going all the way back to Oklahoma City. Have we forgotten the member of the Coast Guard who was planning on murdering Trump critics in the Democrat Party and media. The right is not tolerant.

That is not the argument. The argument is that while the Left bills itself as the tolerance police within its own ranks some of the most intolerant acts of hate are taking place over discourse. Point being... the Left needs to either stop wagging its finger about tolerance or stop shooting up exposed Republican Congressmen in an open field??

It is the argument since you asked this question:

When was the last time a Donald Trump supporter planned a mass slaughter and carried out a mass shooting of exposed Democrat Congressmen playing baseball on an open field?

And since the leader of your party is an intolerant racist piece of garbage.....

Plus there is the general opinions of republicans in forums like this.