Shocker! ACLU goes to bat for Trump on Gag Order....1st Amendment rights violated!

Freedomisneverfree

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2021
3,818
5,273
1,938
The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity.




REUTERS/Jeenah Moon


After filing hundreds of legal actions against Donald Trump’s White House, The American Civil Liberties Union is going to bat for the former president in his federal election interference case. The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity. “No modern-day president did more damage to civil liberties and civil rights than President Trump, but if we allow his free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices — even ones we agree with — will also be silenced,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump’s policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague.”
Read it at ACLU

 
So now the ACLU is all about free speech?


Why did they not get upset over Twitter being censored?

I smell a rat.
ACLU cares to protect the United States Constitution. I started out not caring much for them, but over the years, I've noticed they're strictly immaculate supporters of our country's Constitution. Period.
 
The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity.




REUTERS/Jeenah Moon


After filing hundreds of legal actions against Donald Trump’s White House, The American Civil Liberties Union is going to bat for the former president in his federal election interference case. The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity. “No modern-day president did more damage to civil liberties and civil rights than President Trump, but if we allow his free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices — even ones we agree with — will also be silenced,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump’s policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague.”
Read it at ACLU

Not shocking at all, for two reasons. The ACLU calls 'em as they see's 'em without respect to, in this case, Trump being a law breaking buffoon. Second, in their opinion the gag order is overly broad and too vague but not inherently unconstitutional.
 
The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity.




REUTERS/Jeenah Moon


After filing hundreds of legal actions against Donald Trump’s White House, The American Civil Liberties Union is going to bat for the former president in his federal election interference case. The ACLU announced Wednesday that it filed a legal brief arguing the gag order issued by D.C District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan violates the First Amendment. The ACLU in particular took issue with the broad nature of the order, which Chutkan paused last week to allow an appeals court to determine its necessity. “No modern-day president did more damage to civil liberties and civil rights than President Trump, but if we allow his free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices — even ones we agree with — will also be silenced,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump’s policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague.”
Read it at ACLU

Even they know a railroad job when they see one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top