Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive

[justoffal]

Again? Why didn't this happen for any of the last hundred times it was predicted?

That's the thing with cults. Each time their predicted armageddon day fails to arrive, they just push the date back some more.

That is probably the most damning trait of a cult.
Though I would wager that eventually we will find election tampering. There were just too many coincidences. Having said that this kind of attack on the system is also two edged sword for the attacker. Even if Trump wins there's going to be a shadow over that win now. You can't just make this stuff go away overnight after 3 and 1/2 years of fertilizing it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Are you spamming now? Finally something you can handle.

So show the evidence

You have never shown any

 

[Skylar]

So show the evidence

You have never shown any

They babble endlessly about the 'merits' of Trump's cases, and how they should never have been thrown out on standing.

But when you ask them to show you the evidence that Trump won in 2020, and feel free to cite the 'meritorious lawsuits' and the evidence within them....

.......its nothing but pathetic excuses why they can't.

 

[otto105]

What happened in GA. is hardly nothing. I just proved you were and are wrong. We are done.

Hilarious that you feel that you proved anything.

 

[Skylar]

Hilarious that you feel that you proved anything.

He cites a call for an investigation as 'proof' that the Election was stolen. Then ignore the RESULTS of that very investigation, folding it into his conspiracy.

At no point can Last or any of the rest of them ACTUALLY prove that Trump won.

The Big Lie....is based on nothing.

 

[The Duke]

They don't have 'circumstantial evidence.'. They have a ludicrously complicated series of baseless speculation backed by jackshit.

For example, Zuckerberg's wife supposedly gave 2 million to the Georgia Election Board. And....then what?

What is that evidence of? They can't say. They have ZERO evidence of any impropriety, any cheating on the part of Zuckerberg's wife, any communication between them to throw the election, any requests for any alterations, any quid quo pro of Biden winning.

Not a goddamn thing. The Big Lie is based on nothing.

Zuckerberg spent $400 milion+ and completely funded entire precincts nationwide and was completely in charge of vote counting in ..get this: Only all the swing states where there's discrepancies.

Wisconsin, MI, PA, AZ, GA. Oh, there's something there if someone did some digging.

 

[otto105]

Zuckerberg spent $400 milion+ and completely funded entire precincts nationwide and was completely in charge of vote counting in ..get this: Only all the swing states where there's discrepancies.

Wisconsin, MI, PA, AZ, GA. Oh, there's something there if someone did some digging.

A total lie felony fuckup

 

[Skylar]

Zuckerberg spent $400 milion+ and completely funded entire precincts nationwide and was completely in charge of vote counting in ..get this: Only all the swing states where there's discrepancies.

Source, please.

Further, do you have ANY evidence that those funds were used for any voter fraud, were directed for any voter fraud, came with any quid quo pro to benefit Biden, or take any votes from Trump? Any communication indicating as much, any thing?

Of course not. You have nothing.

Do you have any evidence that the Center for Tech and Civic Life and Center for Election Innovation and Research committed any voter fraud, required any voter fraud, made any agreement with any election board, county or precinct to aid Biden or take votes from Trump?

Of course not. You have nothing.

You have story that you've made up from nothing, that you can't support factually. That's not 'circumstantial evidence'. That's called creative writing.

Are you starting to see why your ilk had a PERFECT record of failure in court?

Wisconsin, MI, PA, AZ, GA. Oh, there's something there if someone did some digging.

Digging, you say?

"On December 15, 2021, CTCL issued a final report on their 2020 grant program and published a copy of the Form 990 that the group filed with the IRS. The form covered activity from February 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021, and revealed that the group paid out $332,090,669 in grants during that period.[8] The group said it distributed grants to nearly 2,500 U.S. election departments in 49 states.

Center for Tech and Civic Life's (CTCL) grants to election agencies, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

So since you claim to have done some 'digging', you know this already. Meaning you willingly and intentionally lied to us about where the grant money was going. Because you knew the truth would obliterate your silly narrative. And because you don't actually have any evidence of any voting fraud commited by any of the non-profits that Zuckerberg donated to to distribute funds.

You have a story you made up backed by nothing.

And you lied to try and keep that story from collapsing. So much for 'circumstantial evidence'. Turns out, its just baseless speculation backed by your own lies. Try again.

Show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020. Without the foolish, demonstratably false lies, this time.

 

[The Duke]

Source, please.

Further, do you have ANY evidence that those funds were used for any voter fraud, were directed for any voter fraud, came with any quid quo pro to benefit Biden, or take any votes from Trump? Any communication indicating as much, any thing?

Of course not. You have nothing.

Do you have any evidence that the Center for Tech and Civic Life and Center for Election Innovation and Research committed any voter fraud, required any voter fraud, made any agreement with any election board, county or precinct to aid Biden or take votes from Trump?

Of course not. You have nothing.

You have story that you've made up from nothing, that you can't support factually. That's not 'circumstantial evidence'. That's called creative writing.

Are you starting to see why your ilk had a PERFECT record of failure in court?




Digging, you say?

"On December 15, 2021, CTCL issued a final report on their 2020 grant program and published a copy of the Form 990 that the group filed with the IRS. The form covered activity from February 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021, and revealed that the group paid out $332,090,669 in grants during that period.[8] The group said it distributed grants to nearly 2,500 U.S. election departments in 49 states.

Center for Tech and Civic Life's (CTCL) grants to election agencies, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

So since you claim to have done some 'digging', you know this already. Meaning you willingly and intentionally lied to us about where the grant money was going. Because you knew the truth would obliterate your silly narrative. And because you don't actually have any evidence of any voting fraud commited by any of the non-profits that Zuckerberg donated to to distribute funds.

You have a story you made up backed by nothing.

And you lied to try and keep that story from collapsing. So much for 'circumstantial evidence'. Turns out, its just baseless speculation backed by your own lies. Try again.

Show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020. Without the foolish,

Wisconsin bans private funding of elections after Mark Zuckerberg dropped $10 million in 2020

'Goodbye, Zuckerbucks!'

www.dailydot.com

Analysis: How Zuckerberg paid millions for progressives to work with 2020 voting officials nationwide

In the months leading up to November’s election, voting officials in major cities and counties worked with a progressive group funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and its allies to cre…

www.news-herald.com

How Mark Zuckerberg helped Dems sway the 2020 election

The 2020 election wasn’t stolen — but it could have been paid for. Mark Zuckerberg’s millions bought lefty activists access to local election offices, allowing them to organize massive get-ou…

nypost.com

How Zuck’s Bucks helped flip Wisconsin for Joe Biden after Hillary’s 2016 defeat

Wisconsin shocked the Hillary Clinton campaign when it went for Donald Trump in 2016, after having voted for Barack Obama in two elections. Democrats were intent that it not go red again. To ensure…

nypost.com

You're backed by nothing, you vapid ****.

 

[Skylar]

Wisconsin bans private funding of elections after Mark Zuckerberg dropped $10 million in 2020

'Goodbye, Zuckerbucks!'

www.dailydot.com

Analysis: How Zuckerberg paid millions for progressives to work with 2020 voting officials nationwide

In the months leading up to November’s election, voting officials in major cities and counties worked with a progressive group funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and its allies to cre…

www.news-herald.com

How Mark Zuckerberg helped Dems sway the 2020 election

The 2020 election wasn’t stolen — but it could have been paid for. Mark Zuckerberg’s millions bought lefty activists access to local election offices, allowing them to organize massive get-ou…

nypost.com

How Zuck’s Bucks helped flip Wisconsin for Joe Biden after Hillary’s 2016 defeat

Wisconsin shocked the Hillary Clinton campaign when it went for Donald Trump in 2016, after having voted for Barack Obama in two elections. Democrats were intent that it not go red again. To ensure…

nypost.com

You're backed by nothing, you vapid ****.

So you lied about the donations only going to those states with 'discrepancies', when in fact the donations when to 49 of 50 States. If your argument had merit, why lie?

Worse, you have no evidence of any voter fraud by either Center for Tech and Civic Life and Center for Election Innovation and Research. Absolutely nothing. Let alone anything that could change the outcome of the election.

So you have neither direct evidence, nor circumstantial. You have a story you can't factually support. Backed by literally no evidence. With your 'pattern' being 49 of 50 states.

Can you see why your ilk have a PERFECT record of failure in court? Literally every Big Lie case you lost.

 

[The Duke]

"But Zuck’s bucks came with strings that boosted the activists’ drive to change rules to favor absentee voting and ballot harvesting — and to secure partisans’ access to election information, such as how many people voted in various areas.


As author Mollie Hemingway and researcher William Doyle outline for The Post, the left used Zuckerberg’s gifts to exploit the pandemic to change long-established voting rules, with the clear goal of creating a structural bias to give Democrats a leg up. The money wasn’t spent evenly across the country but focused on counties where Democrats thought they would be more competitive."

"And it worked. Of 25 CTCL grants of $1 million or more to cities and counties in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia, 23 went to places Joe Biden won."

How Mark Zuckerberg helped Dems sway the 2020 election

The 2020 election wasn’t stolen — but it could have been paid for. Mark Zuckerberg’s millions bought lefty activists access to local election offices, allowing them to organize massive get-ou…

nypost.com

Btw, that's illegal in most states now.

 

[Skylar]

"But Zuck’s bucks came with strings that boosted the activists’ drive to change rules to favor absentee voting and ballot harvesting — and to secure partisans’ access to election information, such as how many people voted in various areas.

Election information like how many people voted in various areas....is public information. You can look it up right now.

What voter fraud did Zuckerberg or either Center for Tech and Civic Life or Center for Election Innovation and Research commit? Nothing you've presented demonstrates ANY voter fraud.

You literally have notnhing to demonstrate that Trump won. You literally have nothing to factually establish that Zuckerberg or either Center for Tech and Civic Life or Center for Election Innovation and Research commited any voter fraud.

Just a story, backed by jackshit.

"And it worked. Of 25 CTCL grants of $1 million or more to cities and counties in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia, 23 went to places Joe Biden won."

Laughing......so TEXAS had massive discrepancies? You JUST admitted you lied your ass off again. You're burning credibility like cordwood here, literally disproving your own premise with your own posts.

And of course the CTCL donate to far more than Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia. They donated to 49 of 50 States. So try again.

Show us the evidence that Trump won the 2020 election.

So much for your pattern or circumstantial evidence. Even your imaginary narrative, backed by literally nothing, collapses under the weight of an even passing review of the evidence.

 

[Lastamender]

So you're making up a conspiracy, based on nothing. Then folding ANYTHING, any person, any agency, any election, any government, any investigation, any official....into your conspiracy if they don't ape your conspiracy.

Anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy becomes part of it. Why then are you demanding investigations when you have committed to ignoring the results of any investigation?

And of course, you're still stuck with the rotting core of your conspiracy: You have no evidence that Trump won in 2020.

The Big Lie is based on nothing.

The report is right in front of you. It shows the election never should have been certified.. Period. You are based on nothing.

 

[Skylar]

The report is right in front of you. It shows the election never should have been certified.. Period. You are based on nothing.

And the calls by Kemp to investigate were honored. Here's what they found on the UNOFFICIAL hand count:

"Georgia election investigators reported Wednesday that they found repeated human errors during an unofficial hand recount of the 2020 presidential election in Fulton County, but the overall results appeared to be correct."

The results of the very investigation called for in your letter. And you just make up another conspiracy to ignore it. All so you can cling to your Big Lie, a conspiracy based on nothing.

No wonder you can't show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020.

 

[Lastamender]

And the calls by Kemp to investigate were honored. Here's what they found on the UNOFFICIAL hand count:

"Georgia election investigators reported Wednesday that they found repeated human errors during an unofficial hand recount of the 2020 presidential election in Fulton County, but the overall results appeared to be correct."

The results of the very investigation called for in your letter. And you just make up another conspiracy to ignore it. All so you can cling to your Big Lie, a conspiracy based on nothing.

No wonder you can't show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020.

No mention that the three counts came up with different numbers? Why?

 

[Skylar]

No mention that the three counts came up with different numbers?

On an UNOFFICIAL count? Remember, this wasn't a formal count that Kemp asked to be investigated. And the results of that investigation that Kemp called for found that the overall results appeared to be correct.

So how is the overall results being correct an indication that Trump won and there was massive voter fraud?

Time for another conspiracy! You clearly can't show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020.

 

[Lastamender]

On an UNOFFICIAL count? Remember, this wasn't a formal count that Kemp asked to be investigated. And the results of that investigation that Kemp called for found that the overall results appeared to be correct.

So how is the overall results being correct an indication that Trump won and there was massive voter fraud?

Time for another conspiracy! You clearly can't show us the evidence that Trump won in 2020.

AA lot of excuses and enough proof to show the election was not valid. Face it.

 

[Skylar]

AA lot of excuses and enough proof to show the election was not valid. Face it.

Laughing.....overall accurate results on an UNOFFICIAL count is proof that the election was not valid?

Um, the State of Georgia disagrees.

You literally have to ignore the results of the VERY investigation your letter called for to cling to your silly conspiracy.

And of course, you still have no evidence that Trump won the 2020 election. Your Big Lie is based on nothing.

 

[Lastamender]

Laughing.....overall accurate results on an UNOFFICIAL count is proof that the election was not valid?

Um, the State of Georgia disagrees.

You literally have to ignore the results of the VERY investigation your letter called for to cling to your silly conspiracy.

And of course, you still have no evidence that Trump won the 2020 election. Your Big Lie is based on nothing.

Who says they are accurate? Three different totals is not accurate. They are criminals and you just don't care. You are the lowest form of life on this forum. I bet your ugly too.

 

[Skylar]

Who says they are accurate? Three different totals is not accurate. They are criminals and you just don't care. You are the lowest form of life on this forum. I bet your ugly too.

That would the Election Board, the very people that the Governor asked to conduct the investigation.

They found the overall results to be accurate. So how does an overall result that is accurate indicate an invalid election?

ANd of course, Georgia contradicts you on its own election. Why would I ignore Georgia and instead believe some rando on the internet who has no evidence that Trump won the 2020 election....but still clings to the Big Lie?