CDZ Poll: Which of these two theories has a more solid basis in scientific fact?

[Chuz Life]

Please take the poll and let's discuss the details.

All CDZ rules apply.

 

[Coyote]

You can't choose both eh?

I won't make a choice then.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

You can't choose both eh?

I won't make a choice then.

Second that.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

There's no end to the scientific evidence of man made climate change. Yes, its true that oil-owned scientists disagree but 97% of real scientists agree.

The poll is nonsensical. Its not an either-or question or position. Indeed, its not a question or position at all.

Its a false equivalency and since the OP posts only about one thing, its obvious where he/she is going with this.

 

[Chuz Life]

For those who can not decide... maybe this will jelp.

Which theory requires a greater leap of faith?

 

[Mr Natural]

Apples and oranges

 

[Chuz Life]

Jelp?

Phone for sale.

 

[Cassandro]

The question is which theory has a more solid basis in scientific fact. If you believe that they have equally solid bases, the correct answer would be "neither."

 

[Cassandro]

I voted for life at conception because a human embryo only requires food and shelter to complete its life cycle. Man-made global worming remains speculative.