I choose other, because my opinion encompasses both comes from God and naturally inherent. Or maybe I should either come from God or naturally inherent.
Whether I was created by nature or God, my physical abilities and my mental instincts tell me that I have a right to use them, so long as I don't interfere with others rights to use theirs.
My capacity for speech indicates I am free to do so. My instinct to defend myself, combined with my species capacity for design, tells me that I have a right to carry weapons with which to defend myself.
My ability to create things out of nature, such as a fishing device to catch fish means that I have a right to own the device and the fish I catch. My ownership then grants the right to trade such items for other items which I would then have a natural right to own.
My right not to quarter soldiers in my home, except in time of war and even then only as prescribed by law? Not a natural right. That is codified an extension of the right to own land and buildings. The natural right to own personally created and purchased items is itself extended by law to the artificial right to own land, or rent it if an owner is willing to.