Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 59,395
- 44,627
- 3,615
Have you gotten your 50 grams of fiber today?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you gotten your 50 grams of fiber today?
Have you gotten your 50 grams of fiber today?
You create your own history. No, the diet was rich in whole grains. Dead animals were expensive. We never ate as much of this as we do today.I doubt it.
In 1900, cancer and heart disease were almost unheard of. Guess what? Most Americans at that time ate very little in the way of vegges, grains, or fruits. They ate beef. Lots of beef. Chicken was considered a delicacy, as they wanted the eggs. They did eat fowl and pork, but beef was the predominant food consumed by all Americans, rich or poor.
No. The diet was rich in red meat.You create your own history. No, the diet was rich in whole grains. Dead animals were expensive. We never ate as much of this as we do today.
That has no meaning except to you.
That has no meaning except to you.
You're seldom worthy of an actual responseWell normally you just post a thumbs down without ever offering a written response. This time you did offer a response. Thank you. You’re getting the hang of things.
Thanks.You're seldom worthy of an actual response
But for the benefit of others, this is the rise in American meat consumption
View attachment 731118
The red meat you eat today is nothing like what the family farmer ate in 1900.Thanks.
Many experts believe cancer and heart disease first began increasing with the consumption of the first seed oil fat. Crisco. Around 1920.
At any rate, the American diet in 1900 was heavy on red meat and Americans seldom incurred heart disease or cancer. This means something no?
Thanks.
Many experts believe cancer and heart disease first began increasing with the consumption of the first seed oil fat. Crisco. Around 1920.
At any rate, the American diet in 1900 was heavy on red meat and Americans seldom incurred heart disease or cancer. This means something no?
Thank you. I see it all the time too. Simply providing information can trigger certain people. It's what Christ meant when He said, "having ears, they cannot hear. Having eyes, they cannot see."That doesn’t change the fact that a diet high in meat raises one’s risk for cancer (not to mention heart disease), that’s what numerous studies have shown for a long time. It always amazes me the lengths some people will go to try to fight this, bending over backwards to try to defend what they simply don’t want to even think about giving up. It is really quite sad and pathetic if you ask me.
No. There is no evidence consumption of red meat raises cancer risk. This is a fallacy promoted by nefarious interests. Americans ate almost exclusively red meat for decades and cancer was almost nonexistent.That doesn’t change the fact that a diet high in meat raises one’s risk for cancer (not to mention heart disease), that’s what numerous studies have shown for a long time. It always amazes me the lengths some people will go to try to fight this, bending over backwards to try to defend what they simply don’t want to even think about giving up. It is really quite sad and pathetic if you ask me.
Death AngelThat doesn’t change the fact that a diet high in meat raises one’s risk for cancer (not to mention heart disease), that’s what numerous studies have shown for a long time. It always amazes me the lengths some people will go to try to fight this, bending over backwards to try to defend what they simply don’t want to even think about giving up. It is really quite sad and pathetic if you ask me.
Take a listen to these two doctors. They’ll enlighten you.Death Angel
Here is some great information that will help you both get up to speed, if you want to of course.
Saturated Fats and Health: A Reassessment and Proposal for Food-Based Recommendations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review
Watch this! Delicious!Thank you. I see it all the time too. Simply providing information can trigger certain people. It's what Christ meant when He said, "having ears, they cannot hear. Having eyes, they cannot see."
A wise person hears, and internalizes knowledge. They don't have to openly agree. But they at least consider what we KNOW.
The choice is theirs.