Photographic proof: AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

Here's proof that this shooting was a pre-meditated murder, and not self defense.

The murderer is a member of Antifa.

The victim is a Trump supporter.



AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

By Erica Davies

September 5, 2020

AUTHORITIES have released new surveillance images from the killing of far-right supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson after the suspect, an Antifa activist, was shot by US Marshals in Portland.

Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt on Friday released the unsealed warrant for Michael Forest Reinoehl, who was gunned down by a fugitive task force in Washington state following an exchange of gunfire.

View attachment 385004

Newly released surveillance footage appears to capture the Antifa activist lying in wait moments before he killed a pro-Trump supporter in Portland last weekend

View attachment 385005
Michael Forest Reinoehl allegedly hid in the entrance of a parking garage in Oregon before he and another unknown man ambushed Jay Bishop

The warrant charges the 48-year-old far-left activist with murdering Aaron “Jay” Danielson, who was shot in downtown Portland during last Saturday’s clash between pro-Trump and Black Lives Matter groups.

Reinoehl appeared to lie in wait for the 39-year-old, who also went by the alias Jay Bishop, before the shooting and texted his own son an offer to trade marijuana for a handgun weeks before Danielson’s murder, the court documents reveal.
Now, you are aware the guy pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in connection with the shooting, and the cops killed him instead of taking a chance on him possibly adding cop killer to his resume, right? Been watching TV today. Don't even hear much outrage or regret over his demise, though I am sorry for his family. Why this second post with the exact same picture and story on the same subject?

His own sister said it was no loss.
Sad, but it was true. The dude was a net liability to the human race.
 
Here's proof that this shooting was a pre-meditated murder, and not self defense.

The murderer is a member of Antifa.

The victim is a Trump supporter.



AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

By Erica Davies

September 5, 2020

AUTHORITIES have released new surveillance images from the killing of far-right supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson after the suspect, an Antifa activist, was shot by US Marshals in Portland.

Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt on Friday released the unsealed warrant for Michael Forest Reinoehl, who was gunned down by a fugitive task force in Washington state following an exchange of gunfire.

View attachment 385004

Newly released surveillance footage appears to capture the Antifa activist lying in wait moments before he killed a pro-Trump supporter in Portland last weekend

View attachment 385005
Michael Forest Reinoehl allegedly hid in the entrance of a parking garage in Oregon before he and another unknown man ambushed Jay Bishop

The warrant charges the 48-year-old far-left activist with murdering Aaron “Jay” Danielson, who was shot in downtown Portland during last Saturday’s clash between pro-Trump and Black Lives Matter groups.

Reinoehl appeared to lie in wait for the 39-year-old, who also went by the alias Jay Bishop, before the shooting and texted his own son an offer to trade marijuana for a handgun weeks before Danielson’s murder, the court documents reveal.
Now, you are aware the guy pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in connection with the shooting, and the cops killed him instead of taking a chance on him possibly adding cop killer to his resume, right? Been watching TV today. Don't even hear much outrage or regret over his demise, though I am sorry for his family. Why this second post with the exact same picture and story on the same subject?

I think because at least one moderator has been claiming that the shooting was self defense. This shows pretty clearly that the shooter ambushed his victim.

Nope. You didn’t get that right. Reinoehl claimed self defense.






Okay. Murderers tend to lie about those things don't they. There was already video evidence that he stalked and murdered the Trump supporter so why repeat a known lie?
It was to make a point.







Okay, I'll play. What did they have in common? Kyle Rittenhouse was running away. He didn't fire a shot till he was cornered. The second time he shot was after he had either been knocked down, or fell down. In all the videos though the evidence is really clear. He was running away from the protesters. This guy on the other hand, is seen responding to one of his cohorts to ambush his victim.

All of this is on easily viewed video. So, please let me know how they were similar.
They aren’t.






So what point were you trying to make?

It was in another thread, and made without knowing of the video above. They all claim” self defense” but it isn’t always that clear. Reinoehl Claimed he thought he saw the victim draw a gun (but what he pulled out was a can of mace). If he were still alive he could probably still try that claim, but it wouldn’t be as clear cut given he was lying in wait and had just traded marijuana to get a gun. Rittenhouse’s own claims of self defense aren’t that clear cut either. For example, the guy he shot, but didn’t kill had his hands up and the gun was up in the air and he was backing away I think. Everyone claims self defense, but what it comes down to in the end is did he feel endangered....and did he have other options.

This was another recent case, where a man tried to claim self defense even though man had his hands up and was backing away.







The video I saw was pretty clear. The first guy tried to attack Kyle from behind and tried to take the rifle away from him. One shot that hit that man in the head. The second two shootings are even clearer. One man hits him with a skateboard, and Kyle is trying to run towards some cops while that happens. he gets away from that guy but then falls down so that guy then tries to stomp Kyles head. Kyle shoots him the chest. He then rolls to his butt and sees the Glock in the hands of the third guy so he shoot that man in the arm. He then points the rifle at a fourth person, who is backing away, so he does not shoot him.

That is all very clear. The videographer could not have been better placed for the last bit of the action. That video to me is pretty clear that Kyle was shooting to save his life. He only shot at people who WERE trying to kill him. When they backed away he didn't shoot them. That too is very clear. So I am having a hard time understanding your line of reasoning.
 
Here's proof that this shooting was a pre-meditated murder, and not self defense.

The murderer is a member of Antifa.

The victim is a Trump supporter.



AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

By Erica Davies

September 5, 2020

AUTHORITIES have released new surveillance images from the killing of far-right supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson after the suspect, an Antifa activist, was shot by US Marshals in Portland.

Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt on Friday released the unsealed warrant for Michael Forest Reinoehl, who was gunned down by a fugitive task force in Washington state following an exchange of gunfire.

View attachment 385004

Newly released surveillance footage appears to capture the Antifa activist lying in wait moments before he killed a pro-Trump supporter in Portland last weekend

View attachment 385005
Michael Forest Reinoehl allegedly hid in the entrance of a parking garage in Oregon before he and another unknown man ambushed Jay Bishop

The warrant charges the 48-year-old far-left activist with murdering Aaron “Jay” Danielson, who was shot in downtown Portland during last Saturday’s clash between pro-Trump and Black Lives Matter groups.

Reinoehl appeared to lie in wait for the 39-year-old, who also went by the alias Jay Bishop, before the shooting and texted his own son an offer to trade marijuana for a handgun weeks before Danielson’s murder, the court documents reveal.
Now, you are aware the guy pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in connection with the shooting, and the cops killed him instead of taking a chance on him possibly adding cop killer to his resume, right? Been watching TV today. Don't even hear much outrage or regret over his demise, though I am sorry for his family. Why this second post with the exact same picture and story on the same subject?

I think because at least one moderator has been claiming that the shooting was self defense. This shows pretty clearly that the shooter ambushed his victim.

Nope. You didn’t get that right. Reinoehl claimed self defense.






Okay. Murderers tend to lie about those things don't they. There was already video evidence that he stalked and murdered the Trump supporter so why repeat a known lie?
It was to make a point.







Okay, I'll play. What did they have in common? Kyle Rittenhouse was running away. He didn't fire a shot till he was cornered. The second time he shot was after he had either been knocked down, or fell down. In all the videos though the evidence is really clear. He was running away from the protesters. This guy on the other hand, is seen responding to one of his cohorts to ambush his victim.

All of this is on easily viewed video. So, please let me know how they were similar.
They aren’t.






So what point were you trying to make?

It was in another thread, and made without knowing of the video above. They all claim” self defense” but it isn’t always that clear. Reinoehl Claimed he thought he saw the victim draw a gun (but what he pulled out was a can of mace). If he were still alive he could probably still try that claim, but it wouldn’t be as clear cut given he was lying in wait and had just traded marijuana to get a gun. Rittenhouse’s own claims of self defense aren’t that clear cut either. For example, the guy he shot, but didn’t kill had his hands up and the gun was up in the air and he was backing away I think. Everyone claims self defense, but what it comes down to in the end is did he feel endangered....and did he have other options.

This was another recent case, where a man tried to claim self defense even though man had his hands up and was backing away.







The video I saw was pretty clear. The first guy tried to attack Kyle from behind and tried to take the rifle away from him. One shot that hit that man in the head. The second two shootings are even clearer. One man hits him with a skateboard, and Kyle is trying to run towards some cops while that happens. he gets away from that guy but then falls down so that guy then tries to stomp Kyles head. Kyle shoots him the chest. He then rolls to his butt and sees the Glock in the hands of the third guy so he shoot that man in the arm. He then points the rifle at a fourth person, who is backing away, so he does not shoot him.

That is all very clear. The videographer could not have been better placed for the last bit of the action. That video to me is pretty clear that Kyle was shooting to save his life. He only shot at people who WERE trying to kill him. When they backed away he didn't shoot them. That too is very clear. So I am having a hard time understanding your line of reasoning.
My reasoning is that this isnt a clear case of A is right and B is wrong.

Self defense possible yes

But were Huber and the guy with the gun wrong? No. They were responding to a the immediate threat posed by someone who had just shot a guy andwere attempting to disarm him. You dont know that they were trying to kill him. That is your spin on it and how t appeared to Rittenhouse.

It is possible they a acted righteously.
 
Here's proof that this shooting was a pre-meditated murder, and not self defense.

The murderer is a member of Antifa.

The victim is a Trump supporter.



AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

By Erica Davies

September 5, 2020

AUTHORITIES have released new surveillance images from the killing of far-right supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson after the suspect, an Antifa activist, was shot by US Marshals in Portland.

Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt on Friday released the unsealed warrant for Michael Forest Reinoehl, who was gunned down by a fugitive task force in Washington state following an exchange of gunfire.

View attachment 385004

Newly released surveillance footage appears to capture the Antifa activist lying in wait moments before he killed a pro-Trump supporter in Portland last weekend

View attachment 385005
Michael Forest Reinoehl allegedly hid in the entrance of a parking garage in Oregon before he and another unknown man ambushed Jay Bishop

The warrant charges the 48-year-old far-left activist with murdering Aaron “Jay” Danielson, who was shot in downtown Portland during last Saturday’s clash between pro-Trump and Black Lives Matter groups.

Reinoehl appeared to lie in wait for the 39-year-old, who also went by the alias Jay Bishop, before the shooting and texted his own son an offer to trade marijuana for a handgun weeks before Danielson’s murder, the court documents reveal.
Now, you are aware the guy pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in connection with the shooting, and the cops killed him instead of taking a chance on him possibly adding cop killer to his resume, right? Been watching TV today. Don't even hear much outrage or regret over his demise, though I am sorry for his family. Why this second post with the exact same picture and story on the same subject?

I think because at least one moderator has been claiming that the shooting was self defense. This shows pretty clearly that the shooter ambushed his victim.

Nope. You didn’t get that right. Reinoehl claimed self defense.






Okay. Murderers tend to lie about those things don't they. There was already video evidence that he stalked and murdered the Trump supporter so why repeat a known lie?
It was to make a point.







Okay, I'll play. What did they have in common? Kyle Rittenhouse was running away. He didn't fire a shot till he was cornered. The second time he shot was after he had either been knocked down, or fell down. In all the videos though the evidence is really clear. He was running away from the protesters. This guy on the other hand, is seen responding to one of his cohorts to ambush his victim.

All of this is on easily viewed video. So, please let me know how they were similar.
They aren’t.






So what point were you trying to make?

It was in another thread, and made without knowing of the video above. They all claim” self defense” but it isn’t always that clear. Reinoehl Claimed he thought he saw the victim draw a gun (but what he pulled out was a can of mace). If he were still alive he could probably still try that claim, but it wouldn’t be as clear cut given he was lying in wait and had just traded marijuana to get a gun. Rittenhouse’s own claims of self defense aren’t that clear cut either. For example, the guy he shot, but didn’t kill had his hands up and the gun was up in the air and he was backing away I think. Everyone claims self defense, but what it comes down to in the end is did he feel endangered....and did he have other options.

This was another recent case, where a man tried to claim self defense even though man had his hands up and was backing away.







The video I saw was pretty clear. The first guy tried to attack Kyle from behind and tried to take the rifle away from him. One shot that hit that man in the head. The second two shootings are even clearer. One man hits him with a skateboard, and Kyle is trying to run towards some cops while that happens. he gets away from that guy but then falls down so that guy then tries to stomp Kyles head. Kyle shoots him the chest. He then rolls to his butt and sees the Glock in the hands of the third guy so he shoot that man in the arm. He then points the rifle at a fourth person, who is backing away, so he does not shoot him.

That is all very clear. The videographer could not have been better placed for the last bit of the action. That video to me is pretty clear that Kyle was shooting to save his life. He only shot at people who WERE trying to kill him. When they backed away he didn't shoot them. That too is very clear. So I am having a hard time understanding your line of reasoning.
My reasoning is that this isnt a clear case of A is right and B is wrong.

Self defense possible yes

But were Huber and the guy with the gun wrong? No. They were responding to a the immediate threat posed by someone who had just shot a guy andwere attempting to disarm him. You dont know that they were trying to kill him. That is your spin on it and how t appeared to Rittenhouse.

It is possible they a acted righteously.
If it helps you sleep better at night, go ahead and rationalize it. These fuckers were throwing Molotov cocktails at businesses hope to set them on fire. Fuck 'em....my biggest regret is that Rittenhouse only bumped off two sewer rats instead of three. Commie lives don't matter to me and we should have a bounty placed on each and everyone of them.
 
Here's proof that this shooting was a pre-meditated murder, and not self defense.

The murderer is a member of Antifa.

The victim is a Trump supporter.



AMBUSHED Antifa ‘killer’ Michael Reinoehl seen ‘lying in wait’ before fatally shooting ‘MAGA martyr’ Jay Bishop in Portland

By Erica Davies

September 5, 2020

AUTHORITIES have released new surveillance images from the killing of far-right supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson after the suspect, an Antifa activist, was shot by US Marshals in Portland.

Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt on Friday released the unsealed warrant for Michael Forest Reinoehl, who was gunned down by a fugitive task force in Washington state following an exchange of gunfire.

View attachment 385004

Newly released surveillance footage appears to capture the Antifa activist lying in wait moments before he killed a pro-Trump supporter in Portland last weekend

View attachment 385005
Michael Forest Reinoehl allegedly hid in the entrance of a parking garage in Oregon before he and another unknown man ambushed Jay Bishop

The warrant charges the 48-year-old far-left activist with murdering Aaron “Jay” Danielson, who was shot in downtown Portland during last Saturday’s clash between pro-Trump and Black Lives Matter groups.

Reinoehl appeared to lie in wait for the 39-year-old, who also went by the alias Jay Bishop, before the shooting and texted his own son an offer to trade marijuana for a handgun weeks before Danielson’s murder, the court documents reveal.
Now, you are aware the guy pulled a gun when they came to arrest him in connection with the shooting, and the cops killed him instead of taking a chance on him possibly adding cop killer to his resume, right? Been watching TV today. Don't even hear much outrage or regret over his demise, though I am sorry for his family. Why this second post with the exact same picture and story on the same subject?

I think because at least one moderator has been claiming that the shooting was self defense. This shows pretty clearly that the shooter ambushed his victim.

Nope. You didn’t get that right. Reinoehl claimed self defense.






Okay. Murderers tend to lie about those things don't they. There was already video evidence that he stalked and murdered the Trump supporter so why repeat a known lie?
It was to make a point.







Okay, I'll play. What did they have in common? Kyle Rittenhouse was running away. He didn't fire a shot till he was cornered. The second time he shot was after he had either been knocked down, or fell down. In all the videos though the evidence is really clear. He was running away from the protesters. This guy on the other hand, is seen responding to one of his cohorts to ambush his victim.

All of this is on easily viewed video. So, please let me know how they were similar.
They aren’t.






So what point were you trying to make?

It was in another thread, and made without knowing of the video above. They all claim” self defense” but it isn’t always that clear. Reinoehl Claimed he thought he saw the victim draw a gun (but what he pulled out was a can of mace). If he were still alive he could probably still try that claim, but it wouldn’t be as clear cut given he was lying in wait and had just traded marijuana to get a gun. Rittenhouse’s own claims of self defense aren’t that clear cut either. For example, the guy he shot, but didn’t kill had his hands up and the gun was up in the air and he was backing away I think. Everyone claims self defense, but what it comes down to in the end is did he feel endangered....and did he have other options.

This was another recent case, where a man tried to claim self defense even though man had his hands up and was backing away.







The video I saw was pretty clear. The first guy tried to attack Kyle from behind and tried to take the rifle away from him. One shot that hit that man in the head. The second two shootings are even clearer. One man hits him with a skateboard, and Kyle is trying to run towards some cops while that happens. he gets away from that guy but then falls down so that guy then tries to stomp Kyles head. Kyle shoots him the chest. He then rolls to his butt and sees the Glock in the hands of the third guy so he shoot that man in the arm. He then points the rifle at a fourth person, who is backing away, so he does not shoot him.

That is all very clear. The videographer could not have been better placed for the last bit of the action. That video to me is pretty clear that Kyle was shooting to save his life. He only shot at people who WERE trying to kill him. When they backed away he didn't shoot them. That too is very clear. So I am having a hard time understanding your line of reasoning.
My reasoning is that this isnt a clear case of A is right and B is wrong.

Self defense possible yes

But were Huber and the guy with the gun wrong? No. They were responding to a the immediate threat posed by someone who had just shot a guy andwere attempting to disarm him. You dont know that they were trying to kill him. That is your spin on it and how t appeared to Rittenhouse.

It is possible they a acted righteously.








Excuse me but trying to stomp a person in the head is an attempt to murder. If it is shocking for a cop to do it, it is equally shocking for a person to try and do it to any other human being. That is not an effort to disarm, that is an attempt to murder.

 

Forum List

Back
Top